Advanced Search Results
Kamini Sundari Bewa Vs. Nepal Mondal and ors.
Kolkata
Feb-23-1931
Property
AIR1932Cal389,137Ind.Cas.688
Mitter, J.1. The question of law which falls for determination in this appeal is whether an under-raiyat who has acquired a right of occupancy by custom can successfully resist a suit for eviction brought at the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMon Mohan Pande Vs. Corporation of Calcutta
Kolkata
Feb-09-1931
Civil
AIR1932Cal62,136Ind.Cas.135
Cuming, J.1. The petitioner in this case has been found guilty under Section 391, Calcutta Municipal Act, and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 120. The ground on which the rule has been granted is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAkhoy Kumar Kar Vs. Krishna Chandra Saha
Kolkata
Jan-04-1932
Civil
AIR1932Cal569
1. This is an appeal preferred by a judgment-debtor from an order passed by the Subordinate Judge of 24-Pargannas on 24th July 1931. The circumstances under which the order came to be passed, briefly stated, are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kshitish Chandra Roy Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Feb-04-1932
Criminal
AIR1932Cal547
Panckridge, J.1. In this case the appellant has been convicted of an offence punishable under Section 124-A, I. P. C., and . sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for nine months together with a fine of Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Gafur Bhuiya Vs. Badial Haque and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-08-1932
Property
AIR1932Cal588
Mitter, J.1. This is an appeal by defendant 6 against the decision of the District Judge of Mymensingh by which the learned District Judge granted a decree to the plaintiffs and directed the document in question...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRadha Krishna Thakur and anr. Vs. Official Receiver, Dinesh Chandra Ro ...
Kolkata
Jan-28-1932
Property
AIR1932Cal642
Mukerji, J.1. These two appeals have arisen out of a decision of the District Judge of the 24-Pargannas decreeing the claims of a receiver in insolvency. Sitanath Biswas was adjudicated insolvent by an order, dated 5th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKailash Chandra and ors. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Jun-10-1932
Criminal
AIR1932Cal651
Jack, J.1. This Rule has been issued upon the Chief Presidency Magistrate of Calcutta to show cause why the convictions of the petitioners should not be set aside or why such other or further order should...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Hakim Khan Chaudhuri Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
May-19-1931
Criminal
AIR1932Cal511
Mallik, J.1. Three persons, Mandir Sarkar, Bhadu Mandal and Kafiluddin. Mandal sent a petition to the Superintendent of Police, Bajshahi, and Abdul' Hakim Khan Chaudhuri, the petitioner before us, who was a typist in the District...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSashi Kantha Acharjee and ors. Vs. Promode Chandra Roy and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-24-1931
Property
AIR1932Cal600
1. The properties concern-ad in the suit out of which these appeals have arisen are seven in all, the first six of which are described in Schedule 1 to the plaint being certain taluks or shares...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.K. Mitra Vs. Corporation of Calcutta
Kolkata
Feb-09-1931
PropertyCivil
AIR1932Cal63,136Ind.Cas.465
Cuming, J.1. In these four cases one U. K. Mitra who is the lessee of the building known as the Minerva Theatre has been prosecuted and convicted under Section 391, Calcutta Municipal Act, for keeping open...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »