Advanced Search Results
Ponnusami Udayar and anr. Vs. Emperor
Chennai
Sep-25-1928
Criminal
AIR1929Mad115
ORDERCurgenven, J.1. The two petitioners filed this criminal revision petition against the order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Tirukoilur dated 6th October 1927 deciding to continue the criminal case filed against them by the police under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhola Nath Majumdar Vs. Nayeb Khan and ors.
Kolkata
Jul-20-1928
Property
AIR1929Cal91,114Ind.Cas.154
B.B Ghose, J.1. This is an appeal by the decree-holder under somewhat peeuliar circumstances. The decree-holder-brought a suit for ejectment and mesne profits against the judgment-debtors in which suit he got a decree for ejectment and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhiro Mondal Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Jun-12-1929
Criminal
AIR1929Cal726
Cuming, J.1. This is an appeal by one Khiro against the order of the learned District Judge of Rajshahi convicting the appellant under Section 395, I.P.C., and sentencing him to three years' rigorous imprisonment. The appellant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bengal National Bank, Ltd. Vs. Jatindra Nath Mazumdar and ors.
Kolkata
Dec-10-1928
Contract
AIR1929Cal714,121Ind.Cas.741
Lort-Williams, J.1. In this suit, the plaintiffs' claim against the defandants is for the balance of a current account. The defendants Amar Nath Banerjee and Hiralal Mukherjee do not contest the suit. It is admitted that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPuran Mull Biwani Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Feb-12-1929
Criminal
AIR1929Cal644,122Ind.Cas.218
ORDERMukerji, J.1. The petitioner Puran Mull Biwani has been convicted under Section 44,. Act 4 of 1866, and sentenced to pay a fine. The offence complained of against him was under the first part of Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDurga Prosad Das Vs. Kedarnath Nayek and anr.
Kolkata
May-21-1929
CivilLimitation
AIR1929Cal650
B.B. Ghose, J.1. This is an appeal by the legal representative of judgment-debtor 4 against the order of the District Judge of Midnapur affirming the decision of the Subordinate Judge allowing the execution of the decree...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalyanee Debi Vs. Hari Mohan Ghose
Kolkata
Apr-23-1928
Property Civil
AIR1929Cal574
Rankin, C.J.1. In this case an appeal is brought by the purchaser at a sale held in a mortgage suit. It appears that the appellant purchased the property that was put up for sale and thereafter,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMuktal HosseIn and ors. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Mar-28-1929
Criminal
AIR1929Cal767
Rankin, C.J.1. This is a case which has had reference to the abduction from her home of a minor girl and the accused Muktal, it is clear, wanted to marry her. There were eight persons put...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArjoon Singh and ors. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
May-08-1929
Criminal
AIR1929Cal769
Mukerji, J.1. This is, reference made under Section 438, Criminal P.C., by the Sessions Judge of Hooghly recommending that the conviction of 15 persons, one Arjoon Singh and 14 others, under Section 4, Act 2 (B.C.)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhusan Chandra Ghose Vs. George Henderson and Co.
Kolkata
Jul-19-1929
Civil
AIR1929Cal774
B.B. Ghose, J.1. This is an appeal against an order of the learned Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act dismissing the application made by a workman who had been injured by his arm being torn off...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »