Advanced Search Results
Umesh Chandra Roy Vs. Akrur Chandra Sikdar
Kolkata
Mar-04-1918
LimitationCivil
AIR1919Cal253(2),(1919)ILR46Cal25,50Ind.Cas.15
Teunon and Newbould, JJ.1. This appeal arises out of execution proceedings.2. It appears that on the 23rd December, 1908, a decree for a sum of Rs. 6,473 was made ex parte against three brothers, Dadhiram, Umesh...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJitendra Nath Chatterjee Vs. Asoke Nath Mitter
Kolkata
May-09-1919
Civil
AIR1919Cal312,52Ind.Cas.4
Lancelot Sanderson, C.J.1. In this case a Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause why the order complained of should not be set aside or why such other order should not be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPriya Sundari Dasya Vs. Golapdi Sheik and anr.
Kolkata
Feb-14-1919
Civil
AIR1919Cal294,51Ind.Cas.534
1. No one appears to show cause in this Rule.2. The petitioner is the legal representative of the deceased plaintiff.3. It appears that he instructed his Pleader two days before the expiry of six months for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kailash Chandra Pal and anr. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Aug-26-1918
Land Acquisition
AIR1919Cal367,49Ind.Cas.106
1. In this case the two petitioners Koylash Chandra Pal and Rash Behari Dhar have been convicted of cheating and sentenced under Section 420, Indian Penal Code, each to undergo six months' rigorous, imprisonment,2. The facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNibaran Chandra Mirdha Vs. Ram Charan Mandol and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-17-1919
Property
AIR1919Cal345(1),51Ind.Cas.928
1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff against the decision of the Additional District Judge of Jessore decreeing the appeal of the defendants.2. The plaintiff's suit was to recover possession of certain jamas, The facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJogendra NaraIn Roy Chowdhury Vs. Kiran Chandra Roy
Kolkata
Dec-11-1918
Property
AIR1919Cal424,(1919)ILR46Cal730
Chatterjea and Newbould, JJ.1. This appeal arises out of a suit instituted by the plaintiff (who was the purchaser of an estate sold for arrears of revenue) for the annulment of certain intermediate tenures held by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.C. Tops Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Mar-07-1918
Criminal
AIR1919Cal444,(1919)ILR46Cal31,49Ind.Cas.913
Sanderson, C.J.1. This was a Rule granted by my learned brother and me upon the petition of Aloysius Christoffel Tops on the 4th of March this year and directed to the District Magistrate of the 24-Parganahs...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhairab Chandra Barua Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Feb-07-1919
Criminal
AIR1919Cal433,(1919)ILR46Cal807
Richardson, J.1. I agree in the conclusion, arrived at by my learned, brother.2. We recently had occasion, in Harihar Roy v. Emperor Harihar Roy v. Emveror (Criminal Revision No. 988 of 1918, 22 Nov., 1918. Richardson...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhuban Mohan Guha Vs. Sheikh Badan
Kolkata
Jan-07-1919
PropertyTenancy
AIR1919Cal263,(1919)ILR46Cal766
Chatterjea and Newbould JJ.1. This appeal arises out of a suit for khas possession of the lands in, dispute brought by the plaintiff who purchased the lands at a sale held in execution of a decree...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovinda Ram Das and anr. Vs. Agent, East Indian Railway Company, Ltd.
Kolkata
Apr-10-1919
Civil
AIR1919Cal419,52Ind.Cas.47
1. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs whose suit for damages against the East Indian Railway Company has been dismissed by both the Courts below. It appears that on 5th October 1914 Tilak Chand Piramal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »