Advanced Search Results
Narottam Morarji Gokaldas Vs. the Indian Specie Bank
Mumbai
Apr-04-1917
Company
AIR1917Bom132; (1917)19BOMLR615; 41Ind.Cas.261
Basil Scott, Kt., C.J.1. The first plaintiff, through his three nominees, the 2nd, 3rd and 4th plaintiffs, was the owner of 161 shares-in the Indian Specie Bank. In the month of April 1913, upon instructions from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHuchrao Timmaji Vs. Bhimrao Gururao Deshpande
Mumbai
Sep-11-1917
Family
AIR1917Bom10(2); (1918)20BOMLR161
Shah, J.1. The first point urged in support of these appeals relates to the share of the plaintiffs in the cash allowance in dispute. The plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to three-fourths of the whole...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Piari Vs. Nand Lal
Allahabad
Mar-27-1917
Trusts and Societies
AIR1917All49; (1917)ILR39All636
Tudball and Walsh, JJ.1. This is a first appeal by a plaintiff whose suit has been dismissed by the court below as barred by time. The suit arose out of the following facts. The plaintiff is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Radhe Shiam Vs. Chunni and anr.
Allahabad
Mar-04-1916
Property
AIR1917All483(1); 35Ind.Cas.192
1. We think the view taken by the Court below was correct, namely, that the document, not being executed in the manner prescribed by Section 59 of the Transfer of Property Act, did not operate as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRangi Lal and anr. Vs. Jassa and ors.
Allahabad
Feb-11-1916
Property
AIR1917All483(2); 35Ind.Cas.208a
1. This appeal arises out of a suit for rent in the Revenue Court. The facts are that the plaintiffs, or their representatives, having lent money to the defendants, or their representatives, took a usufructuary mortgage...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAchhaibar Singh and ors. Vs. Musammat Radhi and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-03-1917
Land Acquisition
AIR1917All405(1); 40Ind.Cas.404
1. This is an appeal by the defendants in a suit for redemption. The memorandum of appeal purports to raise two substantial points; but one of these, namely, that relating to the sum payable under a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTej Singh and ors. Vs. Banwari Lal and ors.
Allahabad
May-18-1917
Land Acquisition
AIR1917All427; 40Ind.Cas.544
1. The appellant applied to be adjudicated an insolvent. At the time of his application he owned and possessed considerable zemindari and many houses including the one now in question in which he resides. He also...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishna Lal Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Jul-25-1916
Criminal
AIR1917All450; 35Ind.Cas.1008
Lindsay, J.1. This is an application for revision on behalf of one Krishna Lal, who has been convicted of an offence under Section 82 of the Police Act (V of 1861). The conviction has been upheld...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChampa Lal Vs. Mangal Chand anr.
Allahabad
Oct-24-1916
Land Acquisition
AIR1917All42; 40Ind.Cas.420
1. The first point we have to decide is whether in this case before us there is a question of law. It was decided as such on appeal in Ajmer and was referred to us as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRangpal and ors. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Nov-17-1916
Criminal
AIR1917All85; 40Ind.Cas.314
George Knox, J.1. This appeal is presented by nine persons who have been convicted of offences under Section 147 and Section 333 read with Section 149, Indian Penal Code; for the offence of riot, they have...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »