Advanced Search Results
Cheruvalath Kunhanari Valakkathala Ereehan Alias Kuttappa and ors. Vs. ...
Chennai
Feb-11-1914
Civil
AIR1915Mad414(1); 25Ind.Cas.50
1. We overrule the preliminary objection that no second appeal lies.2. On the merits we are bound by a uniform course of decisions of this Court to hold that where a decree directs the defendants to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.A. Rajam Aiyangar and ors. Vs. Muthukrishna Pillai and ors.
Chennai
Aug-11-1914
Land Acquisition
AIR1915Mad424; 25Ind.Cas.945
Hannay, J.In Civil Revision Petition No. 484 of 1913.1. The question is whether the lower Court is right in holding that the effect of the application by the plaintiff, dated 28th March 1913, asking that a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPichi Aiyar and anr. Vs. Subbarayar Alias Subramania Aiyar
Chennai
Mar-10-1915
Civil
AIR1915Mad1218; (1915)28MLJ513
1. The decision of the learned Judge is right. Mr. Vatadachariar draws attention to the written statement in the suit of the manager against the subscriber and argues that the claim for profits was pleaded in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Natesa Padayachi
Chennai
Apr-19-1915
Criminal
AIR1915Mad1143; (1915)28MLJ690
ORDERKumarasami Sastri, J.1. This is a petition to revise the order of the Sessions Judge of Trichinopoly acquitting the accused. The chief ground is that the Judge did not examine all the prosecution witnesses but made...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishna Rao Alias A. Srinivasa Rao Vs. Aiyasami Padayachi
Chennai
Apr-03-1914
Family
AIR1915Mad12; (1914)27MLJ138
1. This appeal arises out of an unfortunate litigation. The matter has been before the Courts now four times and this is the fifth time that the questions have been considered judicially, and yet the questions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.M. Govindan Nair Vs. M. Achutha Menon
Chennai
Jan-19-1915
Civil
AIR1915Mad1206; (1916)ILR39Mad433; (1915)28MLJ310
Tyabji, J.1. One Sridevi Anterjanam of Thazhakolam Illom was suspected of having committed adultery. In accordance with a custom which is referred to in some detail in Vallabha v. Madusudanan (1889) 12 Mad. 495 an enquiry...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: R. Sobhanadri and Two ors.
Chennai
Apr-15-1915
Criminal
AIR1915Mad1200; (1916)ILR39Mad503
Kumaraswami Sastriyar, J.1. The chief ground urged in appeal is that the accused were prejudiced by the refusal of the Magistrate to allow them to recall and cross-examine the prosecution witnesses.2. The accused were tried for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmmani Vs. Jagannatha Reddi and ors.
Chennai
Apr-08-1915
Property
AIR1915Mad1059(2); 30Ind.Cas.7
Oldfield, J.1. The 4th defendant, the appellant, relied on an oral sale on the 4th May 1901, the date of her unregistered document, Exhibit I, executed by the 1st defendant; the plaintiff on a registered sale-deed,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajah Kumara Venkata Perumal Raju Deva Maharajulungaru Minor by Guardi ...
Chennai
Oct-30-1914
Tenancy
AIR1915Mad1022; (1915)28MLJ81
Kumaraswami Sastri, J.1. The question for decision is whether Section 13, Clause 3 of the Estates Land Act enables the tenant to claim exemption from liability to pay a higher rate of rent for crops raised...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPanambatta Kalathil Kunchu Menon Vs. Kalathinpadikil Narayanan Ezhutes ...
Chennai
Aug-11-1914
Land Acquisition
AIR1915Mad100; 25Ind.Cas.641
Oldfield, J.1. I do not deal with the lower Court's finding on issue.(2) that the plaintiff had an interest entitling him to pay the amount sued for on the defendant's behalf, because my conclusion on issue...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »