Advanced Search Results
NaraIn Trivedi and ors. Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Jan-15-2009
Criminal
2009CriLJ1686
1. Shri Saurabh Sinha and Sri Manish Srivastava, Advocates filed parcha pairvi on behalf of the complainant. It may be placed on record.2. Objections filed on behalf of the State i against the prayer of bail...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Aziz and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-28-2008
Criminal
2009CriLJ1683
ORDERVijay Kumar Verma, J.1. 'Whether the prospective accused can challenge the order directing investigation of the case after registration of the FIR', is the main question that falls for consideration in this application under Section 482...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay Bajpai Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Allahabad
May-02-2008
Criminal
2009CriLJ1689
ORDERV.D. Chaturvedi, J.1. The learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that from the perusal of the F.I.R. and the statement of the witnesses, the offence under Section 504 IPC is not made out. In this regard,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ramachandran Vs. State of Kerala
Kerala
Sep-18-2008
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 3, 8, 27, 114 and 165; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 403
2009CriLJ168; 2008(3)KLJ667
ORDERThomas P. Joseph, J.1. The permissibility of drawing 'double presumption' under law arises for consideration in this case.2. The courts below concurrently found that the revision petitioner committed the ft as alleged by the prosecution. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›