Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Pubs: 2005crilj84 · Page 1 of about 0 results (0.008 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 03 2004

K. Amarnath S/O O.K. Prasad Vs. the Collector and District Magistrate ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-03-2004

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Registration Act - Sections 17; Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug-Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 3(2); Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 - Sections 3 and 4; Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956; A.P. Excise Act - Sections 3(1); Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3; Advisory Board (Amendment) Act, 1951; Constitution of India - Article 22(5)

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD(Cri)531; 2004(6)ALT54; 2005CriLJ843

1. This is an application filed under Section 151 CPC to modify the order passed by this Court in Appl. No. 716 of 2002. Through the order passed in Appl.No. 760 of 2002, this Court directed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2004

Ravinder Kumar Vs. the State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-18-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A

Reported in : 2005CriLJ84

V.K. Bali, J.1. Appellant Ravinder Kumar, who was tried along with his co-accused Sudhir Kumar and Shanti Devi, has since been held guilty for offences under Sections 304-B and 498-A of Indian Penal Code and sentenced...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2004

Mahendrabhai Ravjibhai Patel Vs. Ambalal Prabhudas Patel

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-26-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 397 and 401; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 107, 109, 120, 386(3), 397, 399, 401, 405 and 406

Reported in : 2005CriLJ840

C.K. Buch, J.1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. The learned counsel appearing for the otherside Mr.Saurin Mehta submitted that the Revision Application should be heard on merits and the same should be decided finally.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial