Advanced Search Results
Narmada Enterprises and anr. Vs. State of A.P. and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-12-2005
Criminal
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 51 to 53
2005(2)ALD(Cri)736; II(2007)BC45; 2005CriLJ4492
ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Since both the petitions are interconnected they are being disposed of by a common order.2. Second respondent in these petitions filed complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuresh Chandra Panda and Etc. Vs. State of Orissa
Orissa
Jun-21-2005
Criminal
Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9(B); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27 and 114; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161 and 432; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 171 and 395
2005CriLJ4494
ORDERP.K. Tripathy, J.1. Order of conviction of the petitioners under Section 395, I.P.C. by the Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Assistant Sessions Judge, Rayagada in the combined trial of Sessions Case No. 7 of 1993 and 11 of 1993,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSidharth Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Bihar
Supreme Court of India
Sep-30-2005
Criminal
Arms Act - Sections 27; Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 - Sections 2; Juvenile Justice (Court and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 - Sections 2 and 20; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 10, 30 and 145; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 114, 120B and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 164, 172, 172(3) and 313
AIR2005SC4352; 2006(1)ALD(Cri)234; 2005(3)BLJR2097; 2005CriLJ4499; [2006(1)JCR1(SC)]; JT2005(12)SC310; 2005(7)SCALE700; (2005)12SCC545
K.G. Balakrishnan, J.1. All the three appellants were found guilty by the Sessions Court for various offences. Appellant Arnit Das was found guilty of the offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act as also for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Laxmi Narayan Vs. D.D.A.
Delhi
Jul-12-2004
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 19(1)
2005CriLJ449; 2004(77)DRJ624
B.C. Patel, C.J.1. It is a well recognised principle that a matter of contempt is between the Court and the contemnor. In the instant case an appeal (being LPA. No. 120/2001) preferred by the present applicant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›