Advanced Search Results
Nirmala Vs. Ashu Ram
Rajasthan
Dec-14-1999
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 7
2000CriLJ2001
ORDERV.S. Kokje, J.1. Heard Mr. S.M. Bhansali for the revision petitioner and Mr. H.S. Balot for the non-petitioner.2. By the impugned order the trial Court had rejected a prayer to direct the defendant to allow tape-recording...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›