Advanced Search Results
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Dewadas and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-29-1982
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 378, 378(1), 378(2), 378(3), 378(4), 378(5), 382, 384(1), 385(1), 417, 417(1), 417(2), 417(3), 417(4) and 422; Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules - Rule 1
AIR1982SC800; 1982CriLJ614; 1982(1)SCALE100; (1982)1SCC552; [1982]3SCR81; 1982(14)LC169(SC)
1. The short question involved in this appeal by special leave from the judgment and order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court is, whether an application for 'leave' to appeal under Sub-section (3) of Section 378...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Mar-06-1981
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 395 and 412; Evidence Act - Sections 114
AIR1982SC129; 1982CriLJ610; (1982)3SCC214
ORDERS. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J.1. We have heard counsel for the parties and after going through the judgment of the courts below we are satisfied that this was not a fit case in which the appellants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Zakir Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-02-1981
CriminalConstitution
AIR1982SC696; 1982CriLJ611; (1982)3SCC216
ORDERS. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J.1. In this writ of habeas corpus filed by the detenu, the detenu was arrested on Nov. 29. 1980 and the grounds of detention were served on him On Dec. 1, 1980....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Champalal Punjaji Shah Vs. State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court of India
Jan-27-1982
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 428
AIR1982SC791; 1982CriLJ612; 1982(1)SCALE26; (1982)1SCC507; [1982]3SCR61; 1982(14)LC166(SC)
1. This petition for review and the petition for the issue of Writ under Article 32 were argued by Shri Jethmalani with, what appeared to us to be more than his customary vehemence and emotion. Nonetheless,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.R. Sinha and ors. Vs. the State
Kolkata
Jul-03-1981
Criminal
1982CriLJ61
N.C. Mukherji, J.1. These three applications for anticipatory bail were taken no together for hearing as the same point of law is involved in all these three cases. At the outset, it may be said that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›