Advanced Search Results

Rahman Sheikh and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 242, 342 and 540A

Reported in : AIR1967Cal516,1967CriLJ1292

ORDERA.K. Das, J. 1. This application in revision is directed against an order convicting the petitioners for an offence under Section 6(a) of the Indian Passport Rules. 2. What happened is as follows: The petitioners crossed...

Dattaprasad Dindayal Kalwar Vs. the Cantonment Board Camp

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1967CriLJ1235

ORDERT.K. Tukol, J.1. The petitioner has been convicted under Section 268 of the Cantonments Act (II of 1924) for failure to comply with the notice issued by the Cantonment Board, Belgaum, calling upon him to remove...

Jagdish Prasad Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 5; Uttar Pradesh Foodgrains (Control, Requisition and Distribution) Order, 1963

Reported in : AIR1967All490; 1967CriLJ1260

ORDERD.P. Uniyal, J.1. This revision has been filed from the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Bijnor affirming the conviction of the applicant under Rule 125 of the Defence of India Rules. 1962 for contravention of...

Municipal Board Vs. Dhian Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 10(7), 13(5), 16(1), 19(1) and 19(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 106

Reported in : AIR1967All491; 1967CriLJ1261

M.H. Beg, J.1. This is an appeal by the Municipal Board of Saharanpur against an acquittal of the respondent from a charge framed for an offence punishable under Section 16 read with Section 7 of the...

Abdul Majid Vs. Senior Superintendent and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1967CriLJ1223

H.C.P. Tripathi, J.1. By this petition under Section 49X of the Criminal P. C. the petitioner challenges the validity of his detention in the district jail at Agra in pursuance to an order passed by the...

Jai Karan Het Ram Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1967CriLJ1245

ORDERJ.S. Bedi, J.1. The facts giving rise to this revision petition are as under : S. I. Tejinder Singh P. W. 4 was in village Jamalpur-Sheikhan on 17th July 1961, along with E. S. I. Kartar...

Harbans Singh Khosla Vs. Mst. Gurdev Kaur and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1967CriLJ1246

ORDERH.R. Khanna, J.1. This criminal revision filed by Harbans Singh Khosla is directed against the order of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faridkot, affirming on revision the order of the trial Magistrate whereby the objections of the...

Ghulam Sarwar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 13(3), 14, 19, 21, 22, 32, 226, 352, 352(1), 352(3), 358, 359 and 359(1); Foreigners Act, 1946 - Sections 3 and 3(2); Indian Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 3(2) and 135; Administration of Justice Act, 1960; Defence of India Ordinance, 1962; Sea Customs Act; Defence of India Rules; Supreme Court Rules - Order 35, Rules 3 and 4

Reported in : AIR1967SC1335; 1967CriLJ1204; [1967]2SCR271

Subba Rao, C.J.1. This petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raises the question of VALIDITY of the detention of the petitioner under Section 3 of the Foreigners Act, 1946 (Act No. 31 of...

D.S. Bhatnagar Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 496 and 497

Reported in : AIR1967Delhi83; 1967CriLJ1297

ORDER(1) This is an application by D.S. Bhatnagar, an under-trial `B' class prisoner confined in the Central Jail, New Delhi for his release on bail pending his trial under section 307, Indian Penal Code, and Sections...

Tillo Ram Karam Chand Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1967CriLJ1295

I.D. Dua, J.1. In this criminal revision, Tillo Ram accused-petitioner assails his conviction under Section 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. The learned Magistrate had taken a lenient view of his offence, because he...