Advanced Search Results

Ram Chand Saudagar Ram Vs. Jiwan Bai W/O Ram Chand

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4, 403, 488 and 499; Constitution of India - Article 261

Reported in : AIR1958P& H431; 1958CriLJ1437

ORDERG.L. Chopra, J.1. This petition for revision is directed against an order of Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, maintaining that of Magistrate, 1st Class, Ludhiana, under Section 488, Criminal Procedure Code, granting allowance at the rate of...

In Re: K.V. Murthi

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1958CriLJ143

ORDERChandka Reddy, J.1. The accused was convicted by the 3rd Class Bench Magistrate, Bandar, under Sections 249, 321 (9) read with Section 313 of the District Municipalities Act and sentenced to a tine of Rs. 5/-...

Ram NaraIn Mathur Vs. Chief Justice and Judges of the High Court at Ch ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CompanyCriminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 171; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1956 - Sections 446

Reported in : AIR1958P& H445; 1958CriLJ1439

A.N. Grover, J. 1. This is an appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court by which the appellant has been held guilty of a...

Badri Rai and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B and 165A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 10

Reported in : AIR1958SC953; 1958CriLJ1434; (1958)36MysLJ(SC)764; [1959]1SCR1141

1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the concurrent judgments and orders of the courts below, convicting the two appellants under section 120B read with section 165A, Indian Penal Code, and sentencing them to...

Puranmall Agarwalla Vs. the State of Orissa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 4 and 9; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1890 - Sections 35; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 71;

Reported in : AIR1958SC935; 1958CriLJ1432; [1959]1SCR1162

Imam, J. 1. This appeal by special leave is limited to the question 'whether transport includes possession, and so the double punishment for possession and transport is not warranted by law' as stated in ground (xi)...