Advanced Search Results
Lal Singh Vs. the State
Allahabad
Sep-06-1955
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300; Constitution of India - Article 134 and 134(1)
AIR1956All731; 1956CriLJ1385
Mukerji, J.1. This is an appeal by Lal Singh, who has been convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Mainpuri under Section 302 and Section 201 read with Section 611, Penal Code. The appellant has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMst. Hosnaki and ors. Vs. State Through Sheo Baran Rai
Allahabad
Sep-20-1955
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 145, 145(1), 145(4) and 145(6); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 13, 49, 41 and 42
AIR1956All81; 1956CriLJ168
1. For the reasons which we shall give later we allow this application, set aside the order dated 18-9-1953 of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate and direct him to rehear the case. He must receive all the evidence...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohammad Shafique Vs. the State
Allahabad
Sep-09-1955
Criminal
Influx from Pakistan (Control) Act, 1949 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Article 20; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 423; Permit System Rules, 1948 - Rule 12; Influx form Pakistan (Control) Ordinance, 1948 - Sections 4 and 5
AIR1956All108; 1956CriLJ176
Desai, J 1. This is an application in revision by one Mohammad Shafiq from judgments of the Courts below convicting him under Section 5 of the Influx from Pakistan (Control) Act (No. XXIII), 1949. The trial...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ganga Singh and ors. Vs. the State
Allahabad
Sep-12-1955
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 496
AIR1956All122; 1956CriLJ181
ORDERRoy, J. 1. This is an application in revision by Ganga Singh, Hodal and Pratap, who have been convicted under Section 379, I. P. C. and each of whom has been sentenced to undergo one year's...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKaran Singh Vs. the State
Allahabad
Sep-16-1955
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 221, 233, 236 and 237; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 304(1) and 304
AIR1956All159; 1956CriLJ194
Asthana, J. 1. In this case five persons, namely, Karan Singh, Subedar, Dalel, Lakhan and Ram Lal, were charged as follows:'That you on or about 14-10-1950 at about 7 p. m. in village Sarai Jawaharpur committed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahendra Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Sep-07-1955
Service
Police Act, 1861 - Sections 1, 7, 17, 28, 29 and 35
AIR1956All96; 1956CriLJ174; (1955)IILLJ750All
Agarwala, J.1. This special appeal arises out of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The applicant Sri Mahendra Singh was posted as a head constable at police outpost, George Town, Police Station Colonelganj,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHaveli Ram Vs. the State
Allahabad
Sep-05-1955
CriminalIntellectual Property Rights
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 480, 482 and 486
AIR1956All132; 1956CriLJ183
ORDERRoy, J. 1. This is an application in revision by Haveli Ram. He was charged by the Magistrate under Sections 482, 483 and 486, I. P. C. Upon the evidence that was produced before the Magistrate,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRanjit Singh Vs. State Through Bachi Singh
Allahabad
Aug-24-1955
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 197; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 19; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rules - Rule 61
AIR1956All134; 1956CriLJ185
ORDEROak, J. 1. This revision application arises out of a prosecution for defamation. Ranjit Singh applicant is Sarpanch of the Panchayati Adalat of Bhamanswal. There were two cross-cases pending between Har Singh and Gopal Singh before...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam NaraIn Vs. State
Allahabad
Jul-28-1955
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 403; Uttar Pradesh Excise Act, 1910 - Sections 64; Constitution of India - Article 20
AIR1956All141; 1956CriLJ189
ORDEROak, J. 1. These three connected references by the learned Sessions Judge of Etawah arise out of three connected prosecutions under the U. P. Excise Act. The facts of the case are that Ram Narain is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankar Lal Sharma Vs. M.S. Bisht
Allahabad
Oct-17-1955
CriminalContempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 3
AIR1956All160; 1956CriLJ195
1. Sri Shankar Lal Sharma, an employee in the Public Works Department of the Uttar Pradesh, moved in this Court an application for the grant of a writ against Sri M. S. Bisht, Chief Engineer, P.W.D.,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »