Advanced Search Results
Gaya Prasad and ors. Vs. Rex.
Allahabad
May-31-1949
Criminal
1949CriLJ934
ORDERSeth, J.1. There are eight applicants in this case. They have all been convicted of an offence under S. i, U. P. Foodgrains (Movement) Control Order, 197 for having contravened the provisions of Section 8 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPublic Prosecutor Vs. R. Desigan
Chennai
Nov-26-1948
Criminal
1949CriLJ931
Somasundaram, J.1. The accused in this case was convicted by the Additional First Class Magistrate of Ddvakottai in 0. 0. No, 275 of 1947 and sentenced to a fine of Rs. 100 for an offence under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Andi thevan
Chennai
Dec-07-1948
Criminal
AIR1949Mad650; 1949CriLJ933
Subba Rao, J.1. This is a reference undei Section 307, Criminal P. O. by the Assistant SeBsiona Judge, Madura. The four accused in the case were charged with an offence under Section 395, Penal Code. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Madhao Rao Narayan Rao Ghatate Vs. Iswardas Sheoratan Bagdi
Mumbai
Dec-13-1948
Criminal
1949CriLJ932
ORDER1. The questions referred to us are:1. Whether the High Court has inherent powers to exempt an accused from appearance in Court beyond those contained in Ss. SOS and 610-A, Criminal P. C. and2. Is ML...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Kotta Veeraiah and ors.
Chennai
Apr-02-1948
Criminal
1949CriLJ93; (1948)2MLJ107
ORDERGovinda Menon, J.1. I am not satisfied that the case against the different accused has received separate and sufficient attention at the hands of the learned Judge. The evidence of the prosecution witnesses in certain respects...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›