Advanced Search Results

Shamim Rahmani and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 201 and 302

Reported in : AIR1975SC1883; (1975)4SCC652; [1975]SuppSCR315

Advocate for Appellant : Yogeshwar Prasad,; Keshava Sahai,; S.K. Bagga and;

N.L. Untwalia, J.1. These are three appeals by special leave. One of them was directed from some interlocutory order of the High Court and had become infructuous. Mr. Yogeshwar Prasad, learned Counsel for the appellants asked...

Triveni Shankar Saxena Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80

Reported in : AIR1992SC496; JT1992(1)SC37; 1992LabIC299; (1992)IILLJ23SC; 1991(2)SCALE1421; 1992Supp(1)SCC524; [1991]Supp3SCR534; (1992)1UPLBEC41

Advocate for Appellant : Yogeshwar Prasad,; K.K. Gupta,; Gopal Subramanium,;

ORDERS. Ratnavel Pandian, J.1. This appeal is filed by the appellant Triveni Shankar Saxena questioning the correctness of the judgment dated 23.8.1982 rendered by the High Court of Allahabad, Lucknow Bench in Writ Petition No. 226...

Sakal Deep Sahai Srivastava Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 102 and 120; Limitation Act, 1963; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80

Reported in : AIR1974SC338; [1974(28)FLR144]; (1974)ILLJ270SC; (1974)1SCC338; [1974]2SCR485; 1974(1)SLJ123(SC); 1974(6)LC71(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Yogeshwar Prasad,; S.K. Bagga and; S. Bagga, Advs

Beg, J.1. The plaintiff appellant's allegations, in the suit which comes up by special leave before us, may be stated as follows :2. The appellant was appointed a Clerk on 29-7-1925 at Gorakhpur in the Accounts...

M.S. Datta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1975)ILLJ376Del

Jagjit Singh, J.1. Six writ petitions (Nos. 1231, 1280, 1281, 1299, 1300 and 1301 of 1972) were instituted by certain Additional Commissioners of Income-tax for getting quashed the proceedings of the Departmental Promotion Committee dated September...

Ashok Kumar Dixit Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 11(1) and 19(2); Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Ordinance, 1986; Cosntitution of India - Articles 21 and 65; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 167 and 167(2)

Reported in : AIR1987All235

Advocate for Appellant : Jagdish Singh Sengar and ;Rakesh Singh Sengar, Advs.

K.C. Agarwal, J.1. Out of the writ petitions challenging the validity of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (U.P. Act No. 7 of 1986) three cases, which were argued by Sri Jagdish Swarup,...

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Uttar Pradesh University Colleges Pensioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionLabour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 53, 311 and 366(17); Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1994SC2311; JT1994(2)SC569; (1995)IILLJ72SC; 1994(1)SCALE744; (1994)2SCC729; [1994]2SCR171; 1994(2)SLJ52(SC); 1994(1)LC596(SC); (1994)2UPLBEC1067

Advocate for Appellant : D.V. Sehgal and; R.B. Misra, Advs

ORDERB.L. Hansaria, J.1. Leave granted.2. The State of Uttar Pradesh formulated a new scheme of pension and provident fund for the employee of Aided Degree Colleges of the State Service. This was made effective by Government...

Ram Chandra Mawa Lal, Varanasi and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 32, 226, 227, 254(1) and 254(2)

Reported in : AIR1987SC1837; 1984(1)SCALE48; 1984Supp(1)SCC28; [1984]2SCR348

M.P. Thakkar, J.1. The Constitution which promises a socialistic pattern of Society in the preamble and traces the contours of the socialistic philosophy which permeates the spirit of the Constitution, can neither command nor commend the...

Khazan Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 22(5)

Reported in : 1992Supp(3)SCC20

Kuldip Singh,; P.B. Sawant and; N.M. Kasliwal, JJ.1. Admittedly the detenu submitted his representation to the State Government as well as to the Central Government on August 21, 1991. The State Government has filed an affidavit...

Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 21, 47, 245, 246, 265 and 277; Andhra Pradesh Distillery Rules, 1970; Uttar Pradesh Excise Act, 1910; Industries (Development and Regulations) Act, 1951; Industries (Development and Regulations) (Amendment) Act, 1956 - Sections 18G

Reported in : AIR1990SC1927; JT1989(4)SC267; 1989(2)SCALE1045; (1990)1SCC109; [1989]Supp1SCR623

Advocate for Appellant : F.S. Nariman,; M.H. Baig,; A.B. Divan,;

Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. These writ petitions, civil appeals and review petitions relate to the right of the Slates to levy vend fee or duties in respect of industrial alcohol under different legislations in different states. We...

O.P. Garg and Others, Etc. Etc. Vs. State U.P. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 233 and 309; Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1953; Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service (Abolition of Cadre of the Civil and sessions Judges) Rules, 1974 - Rules 2 and 3

Reported in : AIR1991SC1202; [1991(63)FLR89]; JT1991(2)SC359; 1991(1)SCALE768; 1991Supp(2)SCC51; [1991]2SCR424; 1991(3)SLJ61(SC); 1991(2)LC571(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Yogeshwar Prasad,; R.K. Jain,; Satish Chandra,;

ORDERKuldip Singh, J.1. Before us are the members of Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service (hereinafter called the 'Service'). Promotees and the direct recruits, as usual, are in the fray. This is their second round of litigation...