Advanced Search Results
Rabinder Nath Malik Vs. Regional Passport Officer, New Delhi and ors.
Delhi
Dec-23-1966
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 19(1)D, 19(5), 21 and 226; Passport Act, 1920 - Sections 2
AIR1967Delhi1
Yogeshwar Dayal and; V.K. Agnihtori, Advs
Dua, AG. C.J. (1). This petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution has been placed before us in pursuance of the referring order dated 4-11-1966 made by my learned brtoher S.K. Paur, J. Considering...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharat Nidhi Ltd. Vs. Megh Raj Mahajan
Delhi
Nov-28-1955
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 13 and 14 - Order 14, Rule 1; ;Constitution of India - Article 5; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(28); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114
AIR1967Delhi22
Yogeshwar Dayal, Adv
1. On 24th August, 1949, Bharat Nidhi Limited, then known as Bharat Bank Limited, the plaintiff-appellant, filed a suit against Megh Raj Mahajan, defendant-respondent for recovery of Rs.61,194/2/- being the debit balance in the cash credit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Hurricane Works, Through Its Proprietor, Rajab Ali Vs. Union ...
Delhi
Apr-17-1967
Customs
Constitution of India - Article 226; Tariff Act, 1934 - Sections 2
AIR1967Delhi156
Yogeshwar Dayal, Adv
ORDER(1) This judgment will dispose of Civil Writ Petitions Nos 605-D,562-D and 563-D of 1963. I am reciting only the facts of Civil Writ No. 605-D of 1963 as the learned counsel agree that the decision...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shakuntala Devi Vs. Kashmir Chand and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-16-1960
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 22, Rule 3; Hindu Law
AIR1961P& H184
Yogeshwar Dayal and; I.D. Garg, Advs.
I.D. Dua, J.1. One Hazari Lal, since deceased, instituted the suit (out of which the present revision has arisen) for possession of the property in dispute and for recovery of Rs. 440/- on account of mesne...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadan Lal Vs. Competent Authority and anr.
Delhi
Aug-04-1972
Tenancy
Slum Area (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 - Sections 19
ILR1972Delhi857
Y. Dayal,; Maehswar Dayal and; B.N. Nayar, Advs
T.V.R. Tatachari, J.(1) This Letters Patent Appeal was filed by Madan Lal, a tenant, against the judgment of v. S. Deshpande, J. in Civil Writ Petition No 97 of 1968, pronounced on April 1, 1969, dismissing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTara Singh Harbhajan Singh and ors. Vs. Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee
Delhi
May-17-1973
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 22 and 37(2)
9(1973)DLT456
Y. Dayal,; S.C. Malik and; Vijay Kishan, Advs
S.N. Shankar, J. (1) This order will dispose of S. A. 0s. 38 of 1971, 39 of 1971 and 40 of 1971. (2) The appellants (hereafter called 'the tenants') in all these three appeals are in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Kewal Kishan Om Parkash Vs. the State
Punjab and Haryana
May-11-1965
Sales Tax
[1966]18STC402(P& H)
Yogeshwar Dayal, Adv.
S.K. Kapur, J.1. This reference made to this Court by the Chief Commissioner of Delhi under Section 21 of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, arises in the following circumstances. The firm Kewal Kishan Om...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHari Mal Dharam Vir and anr. Vs. R.N. Gupta, Sales Tax Officer and anr ...
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-20-1966
Sales TaxLimitation
[1967]20STC15(P& H)
Yogeshwar Dayal, Adv.
ORDERS.K. Kapur, J.1. The impugned assessments relate to three quarters of the assessment year 1956-57. For the first two quarters ending 30th June, 1956, and 30th September, 1956, the petitioners filed returns of their turnover and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Lala Jagannath Prasad
Supreme Court of India
Mar-29-1994
Service
1995Supp(1)SCC282
Kuldip Singh and; Yogeshwar Dayal, JJ.1. The Railway Board issued a circular dated 17-9-1965 wherein weightage - in respect of temporary service rendered by the officers - was provided on their permanent absorption in Class I...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThiru A. Balakrishnan and anr. Vs. Govt. of T.N. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-22-1994
Service
Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1955 - Rule 10(a)(i), 23
1995Supp(4)SCC108
Kuldip Singh,; S.C. Agrawal and; Yogeshwar Dayal, JJ.1. We issued notice in the review petition as Mr Chidambaram, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, contended that the view taken by us goes contrary to the ratio...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »