Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: yogesh kumar saxena · Page 1 of about 36 results (0.044 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 21 1999

Ghasita (Now Dead) and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-21-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 399, 402 and 498

Reported in : 1999CriLJ3719

Advocate for Appellant : Yogesh Kumar Saxena, Adv.

B.K. Sharma, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 3-12-1980 passed by Sri S.N. Prasad, the then III Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarnagar in Sessions Trial No. 142 of 1979 connected with Sessions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2000

Km. Madhuri Mathur Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-21-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC667; [2001(88)FLR755]; (2001)1UPLBEC751

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Khare and ;Yogesh Kumar Saxena, Advs.

ORDERV.M. Sahai, J.1. This petition relates to change of option by a teacher. The petitioner was Lecturer in Hindi since 1975 in Gyan Bharati Balika Inter College, Birhana, Kanpur Nagar is a recognised and aided institution....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 2002

Madhav Pandey and ors. Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-08-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Sections 34, 218, 219 and 219(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1311

Advocate for Appellant : Yogesh Kumar Saxena and ;D.S. Chauhan, Advs.

Ashok Bhushan, J.1. Heard Sri Yogesh Kumar Saxena for the petitioners and Sri Gajendra Pratap appearing for the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4. Pleadings of the parties are complete and both the parties have agreed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 30 2004

Ram Swarup Bajpayee Vs. Joint Director of Education and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-30-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Service Commission and Selection Boards Act, 1982 - Sections 18 and 33F; Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Service Commission and Selection Boards (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 3

Reported in : (2004)3UPLBEC2356

Advocate for Appellant : Yogesh Kumar Saxena, Adv.

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. The petitioner has prayed for the quashing of the order dated 26.6.1999 passed by the District Inspector of Schools, Etawah, whereby his appointment on the post of Lecturer in Geography has not been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 1998

Shafique Ahmed Vs. Additional District Judge (E.C. Act), Dehradun and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-13-1998

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 11(1), 13, 16, 16(1) and 21(1)

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC662

Advocate for Appellant : Yogesh Kumar Saxena, Adv.

Sudhir Narain, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 14.10.1988 passed by the Prescribed Authority allowing the application for release of the disputed shop in favour of the landlord-respondent No. 3 and the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2005

Chandra Shekhar Vs. J.P. Rajpoot and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-02-2005

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 15, 19 and 19(1); Constitution of India - Articles 129 and 215; Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 5

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2904

Advocate for Appellant : Yogesh Kumar Saxena, Adv.

S. Rafat Alam and Sudhir Agarwal, JJ.1. This special appeal is preferred against the Judgment and order of the Hon'ble single Judge dated 28.10.2005 dismissing Contempt Petition No. 3194 of 2004 filed by the appellant.2. Learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2000

Shri Pal Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-05-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : U.P. Junior High Schools (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and Other Employees) Act, 1978 - Sections 7; U.P. Recognised Basic School (Junior High School Recruitment and Conditions of Services of Teachers) Rules, 1978; U.P. Intermediate Education Act; U.P. High School and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and Other Employees) Act, 1971

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC761

Advocate for Appellant : Yogesh Kumar Saxena, Adv.

V. M. Sahai, J.1. Sri Raghuvar Singh Samta Vidyalay, Auraiya is arecognised and aided institution under the U. P. Recognised Basic School (Junior High School Recruitment and Conditions of Services of Teachers) Rules, 1978 (in brief...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2013

Harjinder Singh @ Jinda Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-18-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON + :18. h September, 2013. CRL.A. 911/2011 & Crl.M.B.No.974/2013 HARJINDER SINGH @ JINDA ....Appellant Through : Mr.Yogesh Kumar Saxena and Mr.Sikander Azam Khan, Advocate....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2009

Committee of Management, Sri Shankar Shiksha Prasar Samiti and anr. Vs ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-03-2009

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2009(85)AWC1871

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. A tricky situation has arisen, namely, whether a case listed on the cause list, should be adjourned on account of an illness slip being sent by a counsel for a party, when, in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2006

Mukesh Singh Chauhan S/O Sri K.P.S. Chauhan, Vs. State of U.P. Through ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-27-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 16E(4), 16F, 16FF, 16FF(4) and 17; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Regulations - Regulations 17 and 20; Constitution of India - Article 30

Reported in : 2006(4)ARC3471

Advocate for Appellant : Y.K. Saxena, Adv.

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. Heard Sri Yogesh Kumar Saxena, the learned Counsel for the petitioners , Sri Ravi Ranjan, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1,2 and 3 and Sri Rajesh Kumar, Advocate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial