Advanced Search Results
Delhi Cloth and General Mills Ltd. Vs. Shambhu Nath Mukherjee
Supreme Court of India
Aug-17-1981
Labour and Industrial
AIR1982SC1150; [1981(43)FLR326]; (1981)4SCC168; 1981(13)LC705(SC)
ORDERD.A. Desai, J.1. Frustration generated by lengthening shadows of interminable Court processes in the fall of one's life, has been the primary and root cause of our failure to end this unending. proceeding And it has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Mohan Lal Vs. R. Kondiah
Supreme Court of India
Feb-02-1979
Property
Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10(3)
AIR1979SC1132; (1979)2SCC616; [1979]3SCR12; 1979(11)LC338(SC)
Y.S. Chitaley,; S.K. Mehta,; P.N. Puri and;
Chinnappa Reddy, J.1. The short question for consideration in this appeal is whether the practice of the legal profession is 'business' within the meaning of Section 10(3)(a)(iii) of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease Rent and Eviction)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBata India Limited Vs. the State of Haryana and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-02-1983
Sales Tax
[1983]54STC226(P& H)
Y.S. Chitaley, Sr. Adv.,; R.N. Narula,; M. Mudgil,;
S.S. Sandhawalia, C.J.1. Whether the mere despatch of manufactured goods to a place outside the State, is synonymous or analogous to the 'consignment of goods in the course of inter-State trade or commerce', as specified in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Meva Ram Arya Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.
Delhi
Dec-06-1983
Election
Delhi Administration Act, 1966 - Sections 3; Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections (3)
AIR1984Delhi123; 25(1984)DLT201
P.N. Lekhi,; Arun Jaitley,; Y.S. Chitaley,;
Sachar, J.(1) This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the election as members of Delhi Development Authority of three representatives of the Metropolitan Council from amongst themselves held on 21.7.1983.(2) Election to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe East India Hotels Ltd. Vs. the State of Jammu and Kashmir
Jammu and Kashmir
Sep-07-1981
Sales Tax
[1982]49STC1(NULL)
Y.S. Chitaley,; Vinay Bhasin,; M. Mudgal,;
I.K. Kotwal, J.1. This judgment will dispose of Writ Petitions Nos. 286, 343, 250, 341, 342, 337, 362, 363, 332 and 283 of 1980 and Writ Petition No. 77 of 1981, the decision whereof turns upon...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.B. Dhall Vs. State Bank of India and Others
Delhi
Sep-02-1983
Labour and Industrial
State Bank Act, 1955 - Sections 50(1) and 50(3); Imperial Bank of India Pension and Guarantee Fund Rules - Rules 10, 11 and 13; Employee Provident Fund Rules - Rule 20; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 301
(1984)ILLJ537Del
P.K. Chatterjee,; A.K. Nag,; Y.S. Chitaley,;
1. THE FACTS : This is a pension case. The petitioner C. B. Dhall retired from the service of the respondent State Bank of India, on 30th June, 1979 as head cashier. It was a pensionable...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.D. Kumar Vs. State
Delhi
Sep-03-1982
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 340
23(1983)DLT3
Y.S. Chitaley and; Rishikesh, Advs
M.L. Jain, J. (1) Three persons, namely Rajinder Kumar Dharminder Kumar and Faquir Chand, were partners of the firm M[s. Nand Kishore Dharminder Kumar. They were prosecuted for the sale of adulterated 'Saunf by Rajinder Kumar,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinderjit C. Parekh and ors. Vs. Shri V.K. Bhatt and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-08-1974
Service
Bombay Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 - Sections 4(1); Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 - Sections 2
AIR1974SC1183; 1974CriLJ906; [1974(28)FLR209]; (1974)0GLR573; 1974LabIC1088; (1974)ILLJ297SC; (1974)4SCC313; [1974]3SCR50; 1974(6)LC163(SC)
Y.S. Chitaley and S.K. Dholakia, Advs
Y.V. Chandrachud, J.1. Appellants 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 are the directors of Rajnagar Spinning and Weaving ., Ahmedabad, and appellant No. 3 is an officer of the said company. On March 19, 1969 a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaIn Irrigation System Ltd. and anr. Vs. Malgonda Anna Patil and ors.
Delhi
May-20-1992
Consumer
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 17
1992(24)DRJ362
Y.S. Chitaley,; D.Y. Chandrachud,; Narayan and;
Y. Krishan, J.(1) These are two appeals against the common Order of the 5th July, 1991 of the State Commission of Maharashtra on the preliminary issue 'Whether the Tribunal (Consumer Forum) has jurisdiction to entertain the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNeedle Industries (India) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Needle Industries Newey (I ...
Supreme Court of India
May-07-1981
Company
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), - Order 19, Rule 2; Evidence Act - Sections 15
AIR1981SC1298; (1982)1CompLJ1(SC); 1981(2)SCALE959; (1981)3SCC333; [1981]3SCR698
F.S. Nariman,; A.K. Sen,; Y.S. Chitaley,;
1. These three appeals by special leave arise out of a judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Madras dated October 6, 1978 allowing an appeal against the judgment of a learned Single...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »