Advanced Search Results

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 29, 30, 30(2), 45, 46, 46(6), 46(7) 46(8), 46(10), 47, 50, 56, 57, 59, 60 and 66; Maintenance of Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to (6), 20, 20(2), 21, 32, 39A, 42, 72, 132, 134, 136, 161 and 217 - ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1898 - Sections 366, 366(1), 366(2) 395, 401, 415, 433, 434 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53, 63, 73, 74, 303 and 379; Punjab Jail Rules; Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1971; Larceny Act, 1861

Reported in : AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557

Advocate for Appellant : Y.S. Chitale,; Randhir Jain,; M. Mudgal,;

Krishna Iyer, J.1.The province of prison justice, the conceptualization of freedom behind bars and the role of judicial power as constitutional sentinel in a prison setting, are of the gravest moment in a world of escalating...

N. Satyanarayana Murthy, S/O N. Sri Ram Vs. The a.P. Cooperative Oil S ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. Y.S.Chitale

THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.8851 OF2008and batch 19-01-2015 N. Satyanarayana Murthy, S/o N. Sr.Ram Murthy Occ: Deputy Manager (Marketing) A.P.Oil Federation, Eluru Petitioner The A.P.Cooperative Oil Seeds Growers Federation LTD.Rep by its...

S.C. JaIn Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Civil Services Rules - Rules 3.26

Reported in : AIR1986SC169; 1986LabIC199; 1985(2)SCALE926; (1985)4SCC645; [1985]Supp3SCR727; 1986(1)SLJ108(SC); 1986(1)LC145(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Y.S. Chitale and; A.K. Ganguli, Advs

R.B. Misra, J.1. Special leave granted. This appeal by special leave is directed against the order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dated 5th January, 1984 dismissing the writ petition in a service matter.2....

Sailen Krishna Majumdar Vs. Malik Labhu Masih (Deceased) Represented b ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 - Sections 18 and 19DD; Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954

Reported in : AIR1989SC1596; JT1989(1)SC361; 1989(1)SCALE461; 1989Supp(1)SCC302; [1989]1SCR817; 1989(1)LC625(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Y.S. Chitale, Senior Adv. and; Ashok Grover, Adv

K.N. Saikia, J.1. This appeal by special leave is from the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in the appellant's regular second appeal No. 706 of 1973 dismissing the appeal and allowing the...

Dr Baliram Waman Hiray Vs. Justice B. LentIn and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 5(4), 5(5) and 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3) and 346; Constitution of India - Article 141; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193 and 228; Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 23; Payment of Wages Act - Sections 18; Indian Railways Act - Sections 40

Reported in : AIR1988SC2267; (1988)90BOMLR434; 1988(3)Crimes655(SC); [1989]176ITR1(SC); JT1988(4)SC265; 1988(2)SCALE688; (1988)4SCC419; [1988]Supp2SCR942; [1989]72STC384(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Y.S. Chitale and; A.S. Bobde, Advs. For the Appearing Partie

A.P. Sen, J.1. This appeal by special leave directed against the judgment and order of a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court dated August 11, 1987 raises a question of far-reaching importance. The question is...

Tharoo Mal Vs. Puran Chand Pandey and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 94(3), 132, 132(1), 132(2), 132(4) and 135(3); Uttar Pradesh Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 1964

Reported in : AIR1971SC306; (1978)1SCC102; [1978]2SCR254; 1977(9)LC818(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Y.S. Chitale and; K.J. John, Advs

1. The appellant before us by grant of special leave under Article 136 of the Constitution is a partner in a firm carrying on the business of running a cinema house called 'Jai Talkies' in the...

Northern Carriers Private Limited Vs. Jullundur Improvement Trust, Jul ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922; Land Acquisition Act

Reported in : AIR1983SC282; 1983(1)SCALE29; (1983)2SCC5

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. Y.S. Chitale

ORDER1. Special leave granted limited to the question of compensation.2. Appellant-Northern Carriers Pvt. Ltd. filed Civil Writ Petition No. 7515 of 1976 in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh under Article 226 of...

Keshhardeo Singhania Vs. Purushottamdas Bhiwanwala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act

Reported in : AIR1983SC354B; 1983(1)SCALE203; (1983)3SCC40

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. Y.S. Chitale

ORDER1. Special leave granted.2. The only question raised in this appeal is whether the deposit of rent made by the appellant is a valid deposit.3. We heard Dr. Y.S. Chitale, learned Counsel for the appellant and...

Jit Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors. Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Police Service Rules, 1959 - Rules 6, 6(1) and 14

Reported in : AIR1979SC1034; 1979LabIC799; (1979)3SCC37; [1979]3SCR194; 1979(11)LC267(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Y.S. Chitale, Adv

P.N. Shinghal, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 10th November 1970, by which the writ petition of the appellants was dismissed on the...

All India General Transport Corporation Vs. Sri Ambika Investment Co. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947 - Sections 8(3) and 11(1)

Reported in : 1987(35)BLJR684; JT1987(2)SC634; 1987(Supp)SCC662

Advocate for Appellant : Y.S. Chitale, Sr. Adv.,; D. Chandrachud and; N.s. Das Bahl,

ORDERA.P. Sen, J.1. We have heard Dr. Y.S. Chitale, learned Counsel for the appellants and find no reason to disagree with the view taken by the High Court. Sub-section (3) of Section 8 of the Bihar...