Advanced Search Results
Hiralal Panachand Shah Vs. N.L. Mehta and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-14-1957
ConstitutionExcise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 8(1), 159(2) and 213; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 245; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3 and 35; Indian Legislature Act, 1869 - Sections 9
AIR1959Bom256; (1958)60BOMLR991
Y.B. Rege and ;R.J. Joshi, Advs.
ORDER1. The Petitioner in this case is a tobacco merchant. He is a member of the Indian Tobacco Merchants He is a member of the Indian Tobacco Merchants Association Limited. He owns a ware-house and holds...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.G. Kazi and ors. Vs. C.V. Jethwani
Mumbai
Apr-12-1966
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 10, 14, 21, 19, 226 and 227; Passport Act, 1920 - Sections 3
AIR1967Bom235; (1966)68BOMLR529
Y.B. Rege and ;S. Baptista, Advs., i/b., P.G. Gokhale, Adv.
Tambe, C.J. This appeal under the Letters Patent raises an important question as to the interpretation of Article 21 of the Constitution, and the question raised is whether the expression 'personal liberty' occurring in the said...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahomed Akbar Abdulla Fazalbhoy Vs. the Official Liquidator
Mumbai
Sep-05-1949
Company
Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 38, 38(1) and 156
AIR1950Bom217; (1950)52BOMLR40
Y.B. Rege and ;H.D. Banaji, Advs.
Chagla, C.J.1. This is an appeal from an order of Tendolkar J. dismissing a summons taken out by the appellant. The summons was for altering the list 'A' of contributories by excluding the name of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Someshchandra Manilall Nanavati Vs. Jivanlal C. Chinai and ors.
Mumbai
Nov-04-1955
Company
Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 17 and 86-I
AIR1956Bom190
Y.B. Rege, Adv., i/b., Matubhai Jamiatram and Madan, Attorneys
Chagla, C.J. 1. The question that arises in this appeal is whether the first respondent is entitled to continue as a nominated director of the National Art Silk Mills Ltd. This is a Private limited company...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Modern Mills Ltd. Vs. V.R. Mangalvedhekar
Mumbai
Mar-13-1950
Labour and Industrial
Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 7 and 15; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 45; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 42 and 78
AIR1950Bom342; (1950)52BOMLR389; ILR1951Bom1; (1953)IILLJ469Bom
Y.B. Rege, Adv.
Chagla, C.J.[1] This is an appeal from an order of Coyajee J., by which he dismissed the petition presented by the Modern Mills. Ltd., for a writ of certiorari against the authority appointed under the Payment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamaben A. Thanawala Vs. Jyoti Ltd. and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-10-1956
Company
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 198, 198(1), 309(1), 309(2), 309(3), 309(8), 314, 318(5), 331, 348, 349, 350, 351, 356, 357, 359 and 360
AIR1958Bom214; (1957)59BOMLR67
Y.B. Rege and ;Bhagwati, Advs.
Chagla, C.J.1. This is a special case submitted to us under section go of the Civil procedure Code and it raises questions of construction of certain sections of the new Companies Act, 1956. Counsel have drawn...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBansilal Lalchand and anr. Vs. Shivlal Lumbarlal and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-07-1952
Family
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rule 1; Hindu Law
AIR1953Bom361; (1953)55BOMLR350; ILR1953Bom1045
Y.B. Rege, ;J.G. Rele and ;B.J. Rele, Advs.
(1) This second appeal arises out of a suit filed by three plaintiffs to obtain a declaration that a sale-deed dated 26-5-1936, executed by defendant 3, who is the lather of plaintiffs 1 and 2 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBurmah-shell Oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India Ltd. Vs. Manmad ...
Mumbai
Mar-25-1957
Other Taxes
Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901 - Sections 47, 47(2) and 59(1); Bombay District Municipal (Amendmend) Act, 1954 - Sections 9, 60, 61 and 62; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Constitution of India - Article 14
AIR1958Bom43; (1957)59BOMLR699
Y.B. Rege, Adv. and ;R.J. Joshi, Adv., i/b., Mulla Mulla and Craigie Blunt and Caroe, Attorneys
Tendolkar, J.1. This is a petition by the Burmah-Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Company of India Ltd., against the Manmad Municipality and the Administrator of the Municipality challenging an attempt of the Municipality to levy octroi...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMather and Platt Ltd. Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Feb-05-1968
Sales Tax
Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 52
[1969]24STC496(Bom)
Y.B. Rege and ;R.N. Mathur, Advs.
Vimadalal, J. 1. The proceedings from which this reference has arisen were initiated by the applicants by means of an application under section 27 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953, before the Deputy Commissioner of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Exchange Bank of India and Africa Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. Laxmic ...
Mumbai
Jul-18-1961
Banking
Banking Companies Act, 1949 - Sections 45A and 45B
1961(63)BLJR889
Y.B. Rege, Adv.
Chainani, C.J.1. The appellant is a Banking Company, to Exchange Bank of India and Africa Ltd. Through its liquidator. The respondent was a share-holder of the above Banking Company before it went in liquidation. On 20th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »