Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: wasim alam and · Page 1 of about 13 results (0.039 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 15 2002

Shankar Lal Yadav Vs. District Judge, Mirzapur and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-15-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Bulidings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 12 and 16; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1515

Advocate for Appellant : L.N. Panday and ;S.K. Pandey, Advs.

Anjani Kumar, J.1. Heard Sri L.N. Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned standing counsel as well as Sri Wasim Alam, learned counsel in opposition.2. By means of the present writ petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2014

Shahid Ali Vs. Union of India and anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-02-2014

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Wasim Alam

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d July, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 3994/2014 SHAHID ALI Through: ..... Petitioner Mohd. Shariq & Mr. Wasim Alam, Advs. along with petitioner in person....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2018

Asha Gupta vs.inder Singhal & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-16-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Wasim Alam

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % ASHA GUPTA RFA No.317/2018 16th April, 2018 Through: ..... Appellant Mohd. Shariq and Mr. Wasim Alam, Advocates. versus INDER SINGHAL & ORS. CORAM: HON’BLE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 07 2005

Nisar Ahmad S/O Faizullah Vs. Registrar/inspector Arabi, Farsi Madarsa ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-07-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Arabic and Farsi Madarsa Rules, 1981; Government Servants Rules

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2720

Advocate for Appellant : R.G. Padia and ;Prakash Padia, Advs.

A.P. Sahi, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Prakash Padia. learned standing counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4 and Sri Wasim Alam for the respondent No. 5 and 6.2. All the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2006

Shashi Kant Tiwari Son of Sri Kamla Prasad Tiwari Vs. Senior Superinte ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-12-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of the Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991 - Rule 8(2)

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3800

Advocate for Appellant : Shashi Nandan and ;Sanjiv Kumar, Advs.

S.K. Singh, J.1. Heard Sri Shashi Nandan, Senior Advocate in support of this petition and Sri Wasim Alam, Standing Counsel in opposition thereof.2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the order of dismissal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 2006

Shiv Rani W/O Sri Sanjeev Kumar Vs. the District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-22-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 106; Election Rules; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 and 80(2)

Reported in : AIR2007All84

Advocate for Appellant : Sri Vikrant Pandey and ;Sudeep Pathak, Advs.

ORDERS.K. Singh, J.1. Heard Sri Vikrant Pandey, learned Advocate in support of this petition and Sri Wasim Alam, learned Standing Counsel ably assisted by Sri Govind Saxena, learned Brief Holder, who appeared/argued as State Counsel to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2000

Chob Singh and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-17-2000

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 122B; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC877

Advocate for Appellant : Wasim Alam and ;Bharat Bhusan Pal, Advs.

ORDERBinod Kumar Roy and Lakshmi Bihari, JJ.1. The first prayer of the petitioners is to quash the order dated 13.9.1995. passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mant, district 'Mathura in substance the English translation of which reads...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2002

Aditya Nath Pathak Vs. District Assistant Registrar Co-operative Socie ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-24-2002

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesLimitation

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 - Sections 98; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Rules

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC1998; (2002)2UPLBEC1391

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Tripathi, ;S.U. Ansari and ;Wasim Alam, Advs.

Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 8.10.1999 passed by the Co-operative Tribunal and the order dated 4.5.1994 passed by the District Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, U. P. Varanasi. These...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 1998

iftikhar Ahmad Siddiqui Vs. State of Public Services Tribunal, Lucknow ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-30-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Civil Services (C.C.A.) Rules, 1930 - Rule 49; Uttar Pradesh Civil Services Regulations; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 49A; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Civil Services Regulations - Articles 351AA and 919A; Income Tax Act; Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Act, 1951

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC1981

Advocate for Appellant : Wasim Alam, Adv.

S.R. Singh, J. 1. Petitioner, who retired from Government Service as Consolidation Officer on 31.7.92, has invoked the procedure of this Court by means of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking relief...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2011

Nizam UddIn Vs. D.J. Azamgarh and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-02-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (C.P.C.) - Order XXI Rule 89

Advocate for Appellant : Wasim Alam; Arjun Singhal; Rajesh Kumar; S.T. Ali, Advs

1. In spite of sufficient service no one appeared on behalf of contesting respondents.2. Heard Sri Arjun Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Respondent nos. 3 and 4, K.K. Maheshwari and Rukmani Sevak obtained a money...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial