Advanced Search Results
Madhya Pradesh Industrial and Commercial Corportation Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Tr ...
Mumbai
Oct-14-1983
Other Taxes
Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 3(1) and 3(3); Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Rules, 1959 - Rule 5(1) and 5(2)
AIR1984Bom135; 1984MhLJ239
W.G. Deo, Adv.
Ginwala, J.1. The petitioner owned a truck. On 13-8-1975 it intimated respondent 2 who is the Taxing Authority under the Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') in form 'NT' prescribed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamjilal Vs. Gulabrao
Mumbai
Jul-27-1978
Tenancy
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 111, 112, 113 and 116
AIR1979Bom44; 1978MhLJ850
W.G. Deo, Adv.
ORDER1. The facts in this revision application are no more in dispute and raise a short question of law.2. The defendant was a tenant of the plaintiff in the premises in suit On 28th October 1974...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhaurao Shamrao Bhalme and ors. Vs. Mahadeo Raghu Yelekar
Mumbai
Aug-16-1978
Contract
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 12, 12(3), 20 and 20(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 6; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 22
AIR1979Bom208; (1979)81BOMLR323
W.G. Deo, Adv.
1. The appellants had brought a suit against the respondent for specific performance of a contract of sale of a field admeasuring 10 acres for a consideration of Rs.400/-. The suit was dismissed by the trial...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shankarlal Laxminarayan Rathi and ors. Vs. Gangabisen Maniklal Sikchi ...
Mumbai
Feb-19-1972
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rules 2 and 4
AIR1972Bom326; 1972MhLJ738
P.P. Deo, ;W. G. Deo, ;V.R. Manohar and ;K.G. Chendke, Advs. in F.A.F.O.D. No. 12 of 1970, ;A.S. Bobde, ;B.A. Udhoji and ;M.L. Vaidya, Advs. in F.A.F.O. D. No. 19 of 1970
Kotwal, C.J. (This reference to a Full Bench has been occasioned by a conflict of decisions of this Court in Channappa Girimalappa v. Bagalkot Bank : AIR1942Bom338 and Rama Kallappa Pujari v. Saidappa Sidrama Pujari AIR...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYamunabai Govindrao Mahajan and anr. Vs. Nagpur Improvement Trust, Nag ...
Mumbai
Nov-11-1976
PropertyCivil
Constitution of India - Article 31(2) and 31(5); Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Schedule - Articles 1, 15 and 31; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 11, 12(1), 18, 19, 19(1), 20, 23, 24, 53 and 54; Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 - Sections 61 and 62; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order XXXIII
AIR1977Bom405
W.G. Deo, Adv.
Masodkak, J.1. These two petitions arise out of land acquisition proceedings initiated for the purpose of Nagpur Improvement Trust relating to Khasra Nos. 72, 73, 74 and 75 of Mouza Pardi, in which the petitioners in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Punjab National Bank Ltd. Vs. Ishwarbhai Bhai Lalbhai Patel and Co ...
Mumbai
Jul-13-1970
Banking
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 191, 192, 193 and 194; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rule 17
AIR1971Bom348; 1971MhLJ9
P.P. Deo and ;W.G. Deo, Advs.
Padhye, J.1. This second appeal had earlier come up for hearing before a Single Judge Mr. Justice Nain and2. The suit was by the present respondent for recovery of an amount of Rs. 5,000/- from the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovindlal Bhikulal Maheshwari and ors. Vs. Firm Thakurdas Bhallabhadas ...
Mumbai
Aug-01-1973
Civil
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 38
AIR1974Bom164; 1974MhLJ106
P.P. Deo and ;W.G. Deo, Advs.
Chandurkar, J. 1. This is an appeal which was originally filed by the plaintiff against the judgment and decree of the joint Civil Judge. Senior Division, Nagpur, dismissing his suit for recovery of Rs. 35,281.78p. from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBenisham Mohanlal Khetan Vs. Mahadeo Tukaram Borkar
Mumbai
Apr-01-1984
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 7, Rule 19
AIR1985Bom462; 1986(2)BomCR352
V.V. Deo,;W.G. Deo and;Y.D. Ramteke, Advs.
V.A. Mohta, J.1. This reference has been made to resolve a conflict on a point -Can a Civil Court under O. 6, R. 17 of the Civil P. C. allow the plaint to he so amended...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBenisham Mohanlal Khetan Vs. Mahadeo Tukaram Borkar
Mumbai
Apr-01-1985
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 7, Rule 10
(1987)87BOMLR397; 1985MhLJ616
V.V. Deo, ;W.G. Deo and ;Y.D. Ramtake, Advs.
V.A. Mohta, J.1. This reference has been made to resolve a conflict on a point-Can a Civil Court under Order 6, Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code allow the plaint to be so amended as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJanata Oil Industries, Nagpur Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax, Ea ...
Mumbai
Jul-18-1966
Sales Tax
Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 22, 22-A(1) and 22-A(2)
[1967]19STC97(Bom)
W.G. Deo, Adv.
Patel, J.1. The petitioner seeks to challenge an order made by the Commissioner of Sales Tax rejecting his revision application as not competent. The short facts are as below : The petitioner is a dealer of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »