Advanced Search Results
Miss Parul Agarwal Vs. University of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Jul-10-2001
Constitution
Hand Book of University of Rajasthan, Ordinance 250(B); Constitution of India - Article 14
AIR2002Raj70; 2002(5)WLC824; 2002(1)WLN571
A.K. Bhandri, Sr. Adv.,; Ajeet Bhandari,; Pradeep Chaudh
Sharma, J.1. The allegations against the Private Educational institutions in the instant writ petitions are that their only aim is to make money, driving a hard bargain, exploiting eagerness to acquire a professional degree which would...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Geeta Sharma Vs. Union Public Service Commission Through Its Secr ...
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Oct-25-2011
Education
For the Applicant: Vivek Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: --------
Justice V. K. Bali, Chairman: 1. Geeta Sharma, the applicant herein, is aggrieved of the rejection of her candidature for the post of Assistant Director (Grade-I) (Electronic) in the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, Ministry of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCentral Bank of India Vs. Seth Brothers
Delhi
Jul-01-1996
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151
1996IVAD(Delhi)225; II(1996)BC385; 64(1996)DLT131; 1996(39)DRJ269
Vivek Sharma,; R.P. Bansal and; S. Poddar, Advs
Manmohan Sarin, J. (1) This is an application moved by the defendants 1I to 3 under Section 151 Cpc wherein they have prayed for the recalling of the order dated 22-5-1995, transferring the present suit to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Subhash NeekhrA. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh, and ors.
Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
Aug-09-2010
Land Acquisition
Shri Vivek Sharma, Adv.
1. Shri Vivek Sharma, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vivek Agrawal, G.A. for respondents/State. Shri Tabrez Sheikh, Counsel for the respondent No.2. This order shall decide W.P.4847/2009 and W.P.9041/2009. The petitioner sought following reliefs :-1. To...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSwami Chakrapani Vs. Election Commission of India
Delhi
May-02-2011
Right to Information
Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005
Mr. Vivek Sharma; Mr. Rajesh Raina, Advs.
1. The Petitioner claims to be the National President of the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha („ABHM), an unrecognized registered political party. He challenges a communication dated 14th January 2011 by the Respondent Election Commission of India...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPurnangini Trehan vs Union of India & Ors.
Delhi
Apr-17-2026
Land Acquisition
$~7, 8, 10, 13, 15, 17, 18, 91, 92, 93, 25, 27, 29, 31, 95, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 44, 48, 49, 53, 56, 59, 61, 71, 72, 85 and 89* IN THE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrem Adip Rishi vs Union of India & Ors.
Delhi
Apr-17-2026
Land Acquisition
$~7, 8, 10, 13, 15, 17, 18, 91, 92, 93, 25, 27, 29, 31, 95, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 44, 48, 49, 53, 56, 59, 61, 71, 72, 85 and 89* IN THE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGautam Bhalla vs Directorate of Enforcement & Anr.
Delhi
Apr-17-2026
Land Acquisition
$~7, 8, 10, 13, 15, 17, 18, 91, 92, 93, 25, 27, 29, 31, 95, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 44, 48, 49, 53, 56, 59, 61, 71, 72, 85 and 89* IN THE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKunwer Sachdev vs Union of India and Ors.
Delhi
Apr-17-2026
Land Acquisition
$~7, 8, 10, 13, 15, 17, 18, 91, 92, 93, 25, 27, 29, 31, 95, 32, 33, 34, 35,37, 38, 39, 44, 48, 49, 53, 56, 59, 61, 71, 72, 85 and 89* IN THE HIGH...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSidhant Gupta vs Union of India & Ors.
Delhi
Apr-17-2026
Land Acquisition
$~7, 8, 10, 13, 15, 17, 18, 91, 92, 93, 25, 27, 29, 31, 95, 32, 33, 34, 35,37, 38, 39, 44, 48, 49, 53, 56, 59, 61, 71, 72, 85 and 89* IN THE HIGH...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »