Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: vivek chaudhary · Page 1 of about 156 results (0.062 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 09 1998

Tayal Potteries and Another Vs. Macroplast (P) Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-09-1998

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 9, 21 and 33

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC2200; [2001]103CompCas404(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Vivek Chaudhary, Adv.

A.K. Banerji, J.1. By means of the abovenoted company petition filed under Sections 433(e) and 434(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956 (The Act in short), the petitioners M/s. Tayal Potteries through its sole proprietor (hereinafter referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2006

Dewan Sugars Ltd. Through Its General Manager (Sugarcane) Vs. Appellat ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-23-2006

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2320

Advocate for Appellant : Vivek Chaudhary, Adv.

Vineet Saran, J.1. Heard Sri Vivek Chaudhary, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Sri S.M.A. Kazmi, learned Additional Advocate General on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2 and Sri Yashwant Varma, assisted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2000

Dr. Rajendra Singh Vs. U.P. Public Service Commission, Allahabad and O ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-06-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC1403; (2000)2UPLBEC1514

Advocate for Appellant : Vivek Chaudhary, Adv.

M. Katju, J.1. Heard Sri Vivek Chaudhary for petitioner in the present writ petition as well as Sri R. K. Ojha in connected Writ Petition No. 9580 of 2000 and Sri Pushpendra for U. P. Public...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 23 2005

Dcm Shriram Industries Ltd., Unit Daurala Sugar Works , Through Its Oc ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-23-2005

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953 - Sections 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3), 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(3), 15(4) and 16; Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Rules, 1954 - Rules 21 and 22; Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Order, 1954

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2513

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Gupta and ;Vivek Chaudhary, Advs.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri S.P. Gupta Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Vivek Chaudhary Advocate, on behalf of the petitioners, Sri Sudhir Chandra Senior Advocate, assisted by Bharti Sapru Advocate, on behalf of Respondent No. 4,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 2004

R.K. Dewan and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-23-2004

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Company Special Provision Act, 1985 - Sections 17, 18, 19, 22 and 22(1); ;Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 131; Debt Recovery Act - Sections 31

Reported in : AIR2005All202; 2005(3)AWC2328; 2005(1)ESC581

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Chandra and ;Vivek Chaudhary, Advs.

1. The present writ petition has been filed questioning the legality of the recovery proceeding initiated against the petitioners with a prayer to quash the recovery citations, dated 11.12.2004, issued to the petitioners on the ground...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2002

Ram Singh and ors. Vs. U.P. State, Through Collector, Ghaziabad

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-10-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 11, 17, 18 and 23

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC625

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Gupta, ;Vivek Chaudhary and ;Pankaj Mittal, Advs.

B.K. Rathi, J.1. The Ghazlabad Development Authority framed a scheme for the development of the city within the municipal limits and for that purposes, the land of the appellants and of other persons was acquired. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2002

Ran Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-10-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23(1)

Reported in : AIR2002All94

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Gupta, ;Vivek Chaudhary and ;Pankaj Mithal, Advs.

B.K. Rathi, J. 1. The Ghaziabad Development Authority framed a scheme for the development of the city within the municipal limits and for that purposes the land of the appellants and of other persons was acquired....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2004

Committed of Management, National Inter College and anr. Vs. Joint Dir ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-30-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 16(CC); Intermediate Education (Amendment) Act, 1980; Constitution of India - Articles 30 and 226

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC988; 2005(1)ESC740

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Khare and ;Vivek Chaudhary, Advs.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, senior advocate, assisted by Sri Vivek Chaudhary, on behalf of the petitioners, learned standing counsel on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Sri N. L. Pandey on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2006

Ratan Singh and ors. Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-26-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pardesh Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 - Sections 82(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23, Rule 1(3)

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3513

Advocate for Appellant : Vivek Chaudhary, Adv.

ORDERUmeshwar Pandey, J.1. Heard Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, the learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Surya Shankar Pandey holding brief of Sri Vivek Saran, learned Counsel for the respondents.2. This petition challenges the order of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 2004

Diwan Sugars Ltd. Vs. Appellate Authority and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-23-2004

Subject : CommercialCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953 - Sections 12, 12(2), 12(3), 15, 15(1), 15(4) and 16; Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Rules, 1954 - Rules 21 and 22

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2358; 2005(1)ESC629

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Gupta and ;Vivek Chaudhary, Advs.

Ashok Bhushan, J.1. Heard Sri S.P. Gupta, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Vivek Chaudhary, for the petitioner, Sri Sudhir Chandra, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Yashwant Verma and Sri V.B. Upadhyaya, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial