Advanced Search Results
Tayal Potteries and Another Vs. Macroplast (P) Ltd.
Allahabad
Sep-09-1998
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 9, 21 and 33
1998(3)AWC2200; [2001]103CompCas404(All)
Vivek Chaudhary, Adv.
A.K. Banerji, J.1. By means of the abovenoted company petition filed under Sections 433(e) and 434(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956 (The Act in short), the petitioners M/s. Tayal Potteries through its sole proprietor (hereinafter referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDewan Sugars Ltd. Through Its General Manager (Sugarcane) Vs. Appellat ...
Allahabad
Feb-23-2006
Commercial
2006(3)AWC2320
Vivek Chaudhary, Adv.
Vineet Saran, J.1. Heard Sri Vivek Chaudhary, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Sri S.M.A. Kazmi, learned Additional Advocate General on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2 and Sri Yashwant Varma, assisted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Rajendra Singh Vs. U.P. Public Service Commission, Allahabad and O ...
Allahabad
Mar-06-2000
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 14
2000(2)AWC1403; (2000)2UPLBEC1514
Vivek Chaudhary, Adv.
M. Katju, J.1. Heard Sri Vivek Chaudhary for petitioner in the present writ petition as well as Sri R. K. Ojha in connected Writ Petition No. 9580 of 2000 and Sri Pushpendra for U. P. Public...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dcm Shriram Industries Ltd., Unit Daurala Sugar Works , Through Its Oc ...
Allahabad
Mar-23-2005
Commercial
Companies Act, 1956; Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953 - Sections 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3), 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(3), 15(4) and 16; Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Rules, 1954 - Rules 21 and 22; Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Order, 1954
2005(3)AWC2513
S.P. Gupta and ;Vivek Chaudhary, Advs.
Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri S.P. Gupta Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Vivek Chaudhary Advocate, on behalf of the petitioners, Sri Sudhir Chandra Senior Advocate, assisted by Bharti Sapru Advocate, on behalf of Respondent No. 4,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.K. Dewan and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-23-2004
SICA
Sick Industrial Company Special Provision Act, 1985 - Sections 17, 18, 19, 22 and 22(1); ;Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 131; Debt Recovery Act - Sections 31
AIR2005All202; 2005(3)AWC2328; 2005(1)ESC581
Sudhir Chandra and ;Vivek Chaudhary, Advs.
1. The present writ petition has been filed questioning the legality of the recovery proceeding initiated against the petitioners with a prayer to quash the recovery citations, dated 11.12.2004, issued to the petitioners on the ground...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Singh and ors. Vs. U.P. State, Through Collector, Ghaziabad
Allahabad
Jan-10-2002
PropertyCivil
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 11, 17, 18 and 23
2002(1)AWC625
S.P. Gupta, ;Vivek Chaudhary and ;Pankaj Mittal, Advs.
B.K. Rathi, J.1. The Ghazlabad Development Authority framed a scheme for the development of the city within the municipal limits and for that purposes, the land of the appellants and of other persons was acquired. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRan Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Jan-10-2002
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23(1)
AIR2002All94
S.P. Gupta, ;Vivek Chaudhary and ;Pankaj Mithal, Advs.
B.K. Rathi, J. 1. The Ghaziabad Development Authority framed a scheme for the development of the city within the municipal limits and for that purposes the land of the appellants and of other persons was acquired....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommitted of Management, National Inter College and anr. Vs. Joint Dir ...
Allahabad
Nov-30-2004
Constitution
Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 16(CC); Intermediate Education (Amendment) Act, 1980; Constitution of India - Articles 30 and 226
2005(1)AWC988; 2005(1)ESC740
Ashok Khare and ;Vivek Chaudhary, Advs.
Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, senior advocate, assisted by Sri Vivek Chaudhary, on behalf of the petitioners, learned standing counsel on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Sri N. L. Pandey on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRatan Singh and ors. Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and anr.
Allahabad
Apr-26-2006
Civil
Uttar Pardesh Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 - Sections 82(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23, Rule 1(3)
2006(4)AWC3513
Vivek Chaudhary, Adv.
ORDERUmeshwar Pandey, J.1. Heard Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, the learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Surya Shankar Pandey holding brief of Sri Vivek Saran, learned Counsel for the respondents.2. This petition challenges the order of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDiwan Sugars Ltd. Vs. Appellate Authority and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-23-2004
CommercialCivil
Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953 - Sections 12, 12(2), 12(3), 15, 15(1), 15(4) and 16; Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Rules, 1954 - Rules 21 and 22
2005(3)AWC2358; 2005(1)ESC629
S.P. Gupta and ;Vivek Chaudhary, Advs.
Ashok Bhushan, J.1. Heard Sri S.P. Gupta, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Vivek Chaudhary, for the petitioner, Sri Sudhir Chandra, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Yashwant Verma and Sri V.B. Upadhyaya, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »