Advanced Search Results

Singhal and Brothers and anr. Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilArbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 3(1), 4, 11, 11(3), 11(4), 11(5), 11(6), 11(7), 16, 21, 30, 43, 43(2), 43(3) and 43(4); ;Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1940; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 43 - Schedule - Article 137; ;Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; ;Land Acquisition Act - Sections 18 and 30; Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1996 - Sections 226

Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR261; 2005(3)MhLj951

Advocate for Appellant : Virendra Tulzapurkar, Sr. Counsel as Amicus Curiae;Milind Vasudeo and ;Badra Dalal, Advs.

F.I. Rebello, J.1. Rule. By consent heard forthwith.2. The main question of law which arise in this petition is as under : Does the Chief Justice or his designate under Section 11 of the Arbitration and...

Maharashtra Mudran Parishad and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Maharashtra Sales Tax on the Transfer of Property in Goods involved in the Execution of Works Contracts (Re-enacted) Act, 1989

Reported in : [2005]139STC193(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Virendra Tulzapurkar, Adv., i/b., ;A.R. Vaidya & Co.

1. Heard Dr. Virendra Tulzapurkar, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Rajiv Chavan, the learned counsel for the respondents.2. The first petitioner claims to be apex body of printers association in the State...

Poonam Investment Company Private Limited Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Comm ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 1997(2)BomCR17

Advocate for Appellant : Sh. Virendra Tulzapurkar, Adv.

Dr. B. P. Saraf, J.1. This is an appeal from the order of the learned Single Judge dated 19th February, 1995 on an application of the respondents. Oil and Natural Gas Commission, under Section 30 of...

Shree Niwas Girni Kamgar Kruti Samiti Vs. Rangnath Basudev Somani

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CompanyCivil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 251, 391, 391(1), 391(2), 391(6), 392, 392(2), 393, 394(A), 434, 439, 443, 466 and 643; ;Companies (Amendment) Act, 1913 - Sections 153; ;Sick Industrial Companies Special Provisions Act; ;Urban Land (Ceiling And Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 10(5) and 20; ;Development Control Regulations, 2001 - Regulation 58

Reported in : 2005(4)BomCR708; [2005]127CompCas752(Bom); (2005)6CompLJ246(Bom); [2005]62SCL175(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Virendra Tulzapurkar, ;Anirudh Joshi, ;I. Chagla and ;Hiralal Thakkar, Advs.;P.G. Rao, Official Liquidator, ;Darius Khambata, ;Riyaz Chagla, ;Molina Thakur, ;B.R. Zaveri, ;Aspi Chinoy, ;A. Ramkrishna,

A.P. Shah, J.1. Appeals admitted.2. By consent of the learned counsel for the parties, appeals were taken up for hearing. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Appeals are being disposed of by this...

Shamrao Vithal Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Star Glass Works

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 2; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 5 and 56

Reported in : 2003(2)ALLMR583; 2003(3)BomCR347; [2003]114CompCas378(Bom); [2003]42SCL769(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Virendra Tulzapurkar and ;B. Colabawala, Advs.

R.M. Lodha, J. 1. The important yet interesting question pertaining to legislation by incorporation has been raised in this writ petition. The question is whether in Section 2(e) of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks...

Sadbuddhi Brahmesh Wagh and ors. Vs. Satish Raghvendra Wagh and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 21 and 24

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR416; 2004(3)BomCR98; 2004(1)MhLj890

Advocate for Appellant : Virendra Tulzapurkar and ;Salil Shah, Advs. i/b ;B. Amin Co.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 16th October 1997 whereby the learned Single Judge dismissed the arbitration petition filed by the appellants herein under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration...

Sunil Seth and anr. Vs. Niranjan D. Woody and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rules 84, 107, 107(10) and 107(14)

Reported in : 2007(2)BomCR430

Advocate for Appellant : Virendra Tulzapurkar, Sr. Counsel, ;Kevic Setalvad and ;D.J. Kakalia, Advs., i/b., Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe

R.M. Lodha, J.1. We heard Dr. Virendra Tulzapurkar, senior counsel, for the appellants for sometime and considered his submissions in the context of Rule 107 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961.2. Rule 107 provides for...

Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Jamshed Kawasjee Vakeel and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR465; 2006(6)BomCR3

Advocate for Appellant : Virendra Tulzapurkar, Sr. Counsel and ;Sandip Parekh, Adv., i/b., Kanga & Co.

ORDERR.M. Lodha, J.1. The defendants are in appeal, dissatisfied with the order dated 7.8.2006. By the said order, the learned Motion Judge restored the suit which was dismissed in default on 9.10.2003. 2. The counsel for...

Wockhardt Limited Vs. Mahesh Medical and General Stores and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual property rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 28 and 106

Reported in : 2002(5)BomCR633

Advocate for Appellant : Virendra Tulzapurkar and Ravi Kadam, Advs. i/b. Arjun T. Bhagat & Co.

P.V. Kakade, J.1. The plaintiff has taken out this Notice of Motion in a suit, inter alia, for an order and injunction restraining the defendants by an interim order and injunction from in any manner using...

CR Retail Malls (India) Limited Vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authorit ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Virendra Tulzapurkar, Shri. Tulzapurkar

1) Rule with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties made returnable forthwith and heard. 2) The Writ Jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is invoked...