Advanced Search Results
Arun Kumar Saxena Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-04-2009
Service
RLW2009(3)Raj2577
Ashok Parihar, J.1. Since on similar set of facts the common judgment passed by the learned Single Judge is under challenge, both the appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common order.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSudhir Jiwan Vs. Raj. State Public Service Commission and anr.
Rajasthan
May-15-1995
CivilService
1996(1)WLC212; 1995(2)WLN526
Shri. Virendra Lodha
Arun Madan, J.1. The petitioner who is a resident of Gurgaon (Haryana) and is a practicing Advocate at Delhi, has filed this writ petition in this Court contending inter-alia that subsequent to his passing LL.B. Examination...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Ramesh Chandra Soni
Rajasthan
Jul-03-2003
Service
Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 - Rule 16; Constitution of India - Article 226
RLW2004(2)Raj867; 2003(4)WLC486
Virendra Lodha, Adv.
S.K. Keshote, J.1. This special appeal under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 is directed by the appellants against the judgment dated 9th December, 2002 of the learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
R.S.R.T.C. and ors. Vs. Khub Chand
Rajasthan
Dec-12-2005
Civil
Rajasthan State Road Transport Workers and Workshop Employees Standing Orders, 1965 - Sections 35; ;Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2, 17 and 17(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100
RLW2006(1)Raj462; 2006(1)WLC419
Virendra Lodha, Adv.
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J. 1. Having heard the submissions and on scanning the material on record I am satisfied that no substantial question of law arises in the instant matter.2. Contextual fact depict that the plaintiff...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAvinash Mathur Vs. State and Others
Rajasthan
Nov-21-2000
Service
2001(4)WLC470; 2001(1)WLN600
Virendra Lodha, Adv.
ORDERYadav, J.(1). The petitioner, by filing the present petition, questions the legality and validity of Annexure-8 to the writ petition, whereby, some of annual adverse remarks, relating to the year 1995-96, have been expunged, on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJvvnl and ors. Vs. Mangal Ram Sharma
Rajasthan
Nov-04-2004
Electricity
AIR2005Raj226; RLW2005(3)Raj2092; 2005(3)WLC34
Virendra Lodha, Adv.
G.S. Misra, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order passed by learned single Judge of this Court on 11-9-2003 in SB Civil Writ Petition No. 2375/2003 by which the additional demand notice...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRadheyshyam and ors. Vs. State
Rajasthan
Apr-11-1991
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226; Midwives Registration Act, 1964 - Sections 13
AIR1992Raj12; 1991(2)WLN481
Virendra Lodha and; Sanjay Pareek, Advs.
I.S. Israni, J.1. Since a common question is involved in all the three writ petitions, they are disposed of by one Single order. The short question involved in these writ petitions is as to whether the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSahib Lal S/O Nathu Lal Vs. State Bank of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Jul-11-1986
Service
1986(1)WLN752
Shri. Virendra Lodha
Guman Mal Lodha, J.1. This is plaintiff's a second appeal against the dismissal of the suit by the two courts below. The plaintiff was appointed as L.C. No. 464, in the office of the Prosecuting Sub-Inspector...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjay Singh and ors. Vs. Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal an ...
Rajasthan
Feb-20-2003
CivilService
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11(4) and 11(5) - Order 2, Rule 2; Tribunal Act, 1976 - Sections 22; Rajasthan Administrative Service Rules, 1954 - Rule 28B; Constitution of India - Article 226
RLW2003(2)Raj1293; 2003(2)WLC559
M. Rafiz, A.A.G.; C.K. Garg, Sr. Adv. and; G.K. Garg
Rathore, J.1. Since all these writ petitions are directed against the order dated 25.10.99 as common question is involved, all the abovesaid four writ petitions are decided by this common order.2. Before proceeding in this case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.D. Sharma and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Jaipur
Mar-29-2001
Land Acquisition
1. These two applications were heard along with the batch of cases involving a controversy relating to the principles for determining the seniority of Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe candidates promoted earlier on roster principles vis-a-vis general category...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »