Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: vipin sinha · Page 1 of about 48 results (0.055 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 18 2005

State Bank of India Through Its Deputy General Manager Vs. Union of In ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-18-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 33C(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC299; [2006(107)FLR898]; (2006)ILLJ625All

Advocate for Appellant : Navin Sinha and ;Vipin Sinha, Advs.

Vineet Saran, J.1. This is the third inning of litigation between the panics, cause of action of which arose in the year' 1969.2. Brief facts of this case as admitted to the parties are that respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2005

Krishna Kumar Vs. Chief General Manager, State Bank of India and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-12-2005

Subject : Family

Acts : Dying in Harness Rules, 1974

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC608; [2005(104)FLR980]; (2005)2UPLBEC1603

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Chaudhary, Adv.

Vineet Saran, J.1. The father of the petitioner was a Class IV employee of the respondent-State Bank of India. He died in harness on 28.3.2000. Immediately thereafter the petitioner filed an application for appointment on compassionate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2002

Wimco Ltd. and anr. Vs. Vikram Singh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-21-2002

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 85(2); Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8 and 20

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC735

Advocate for Appellant : Vipin Sinha and ;Navin Sinha, Advs.

B.K. Rathi, J.1. This revision has been preferred against the order dated 6.9.2000 passed by Civil Judge(Senior Division), Bijnor recording findings on issue Nos. 3 and 5 againstthe revisionists,2. The fact giving rise to this revision...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 02 1999

Smt. Saddiqa Khatoon Alias Siddiqui Khatoon Vs. Iiird Addl. District J ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-02-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 38, Rule 5 and 5(1) and (4)

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC285

Advocate for Appellant : Navin Sinha and ;Vipin Sinha, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J. 1. The order dated 3.7.1999 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, IIIrd Court, Bareilly in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 7 of 1999 affirming the order dated 3.9.1996 passed by the learned civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2005

Baboo Lal Vs. Smt. Shiv Kumari and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-25-2005

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 12(1) and 12(3); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC789; 2005(3)AWC2146

Advocate for Appellant : Vipin Sinha and ;A.K. Singh, Advs.

Mukteshwar Prasad, J.1. By means of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the tenant has questioned the correctness of the order-dated 12.6.2000 (Annexure-9 to the writ petition) passed by Rent Control and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2001

Rajwati Vs. Commissioner, Agra Division and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-27-2001

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC189

Advocate for Appellant : Vipin Sinha, ;Navin Sinha and ;Arun Kumar Singh, Advs.

ORDERBinod Kumar Roy and A.K. Yog,JJ.1. Heard learned counsel. Perused the writ petition, counter-affidavit of respondent No. 4 and the rejoinder of the petitioner.2. The petitioner has come up with a prayer to quash the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2002

State Bank of India Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-16-2002

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Trade Tax Act

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC435; (2003)1UPLBEC328

Advocate for Appellant : Navin Sinha, ;Vipin Sinha and ;K.L. Grover, Advs.

M. Katju, J. 1. This writ petition and Writ Petition No. 2062 of 2002 as well as Writ Petition No. 43 of 1989 involve a similar question and hence, they are being disposed of by a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2011

Vijay Kumar Ruia Vs. Commissioner Income Tax, Kanpur and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-31-2011

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act - Rule 63(1), 65, 86, Schedule II; Land Acquisition Act. - Section 18; Indian Forest Act - Section 17

Advocate for Appellant : Vipin Sinha; Navin Sinha, Advs

1. Challenging the order dated 5.10.2000 (Annexure 9 to the writ petition) passed by the Commissioner of Income-Tax, Kanpur, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the same and a writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2004

Chief General Manager, State Bank of India and ors. Vs. Durgesh Kumar ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-20-2004

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2005)ILLJ796All; (2004)3UPLBEC2244

Advocate for Appellant : Navin Sinha and ;Vipin Sinha, Advs.

M. Katju and Umeshwar Pandey, JJ.1. This special appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 20.5.2003.2. We have heard Sri Navin Sinha, learned Counsel for the appellants and Sri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 1992

Mahendra Pratap Singh (Deceased) and Another Vs. Smt. Padam Kumari Dev ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-22-1992

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 183; Power of Attorney Act, 1882 - Sections 2; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 77 - Order 3, Rule 1 - Order X, Rules 2 and 4 - Order 26, Rules 7, 13 and 20 - Order 32, Rules 1 to 14, 15, 16 and 21 - Order 32A, Rules 1, 2 and 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 109 and 165

Reported in : AIR1993All143

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Sharma, ;P.M. Gupta and ;K.S. Chauhan, Advs.

1. A very ugly situation faces the Court, the High Court, in its original jurisdiction in these cases. Many questions have been flung at the Court. The Court must answer them as they are all questions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial