Advanced Search Results
indraprastha Medical Corporation Ltd., Apollo Hospital Employees Union ...
Delhi
Jun-01-2001
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 3; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 2; Factories Act, 1946; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 2; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Mines Act, 1952; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Discipline Act, 1934; Employees' State of Insurance Act; Constitution of India - Article 30
94(2001)DLT337; 2002(63)DRJ295; [2001(90)FLR460]; (2001)IILLJ1274Del
Mr. Vinay Bhasin, Sr. Adv.,; Mr. Amit Bhasin and; Mr. Umesh
ORDERVikramajit Sen, J.1. The short and interesting question that has arisen in these writ petitions is whether the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'), 1946, (hereinafter referred to as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.B. Mathur Vs. Union of India
Delhi
Oct-28-1997
Service
1997VIAD(Delhi)1042; 1998(44)DRJ355
G.D. Gupta and ; Vinay Bhasin, Advs
Usha Mehra, J.(1) The Short points involved in this writ petition are (i) whether the rule which provides promotion on seniority-cum-merit would mean comparative merit only or seniority and then merit. (ii) whether the decision of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeseIn Private Limited Vs. Industrial Tribunal Iii and ors.
Delhi
Nov-24-2003
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 24, 27, 33, 33(2) and 33A and ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100
2004(72)DRJ365
Vinay Bhasin, Sr. Adv. and; Amit Bhasin, Adv
Mukul Mudgal, J.1. By the impugned order dated 12th September 2002 the Industrial Tribunal dismissed the application filed by the management/petitioner for staying the proceedings initiated by respondent No. 2/workman under Section 33 of the Industrial...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sehjiv Kumar Tandon Vs. Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking
Delhi
May-27-1993
Electricity
Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2
AIR1994Delhi202
Vinay Bhasin and D.K. Malhotra, Adv
ORDER1. The petitioner's grievance in this Revision petition are that the point raised by him before the learned Addl. District Judge have not been considered and that the trial Court erroneously imposed the condition while ordering...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFouress Engineering (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.
Delhi
Feb-08-1991
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 17B
43(1991)DLT742; (1992)ILLJ710Del
Vinay Bhasin and; Anil Malik, Advs
M.C. Jain, J. (1) This appeal is directed against the order dated 4th August 1982, passed by the learned Single Judge in C.M. No. 1225 of 1986 in C.W.P. No. 1697 of 1982. (2) It appears...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTaj Services Ltd. and anr. Vs. Industrial Tribunal-i Delhi and ors
Delhi
Aug-17-2011
Labour and Industrial
Uttar Pradesh Factories Act; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33A, 17B, 22, 18
Mr. Vinay Bhasin; Mr. H.L. Raina, Advs.
1. W.P. (C) No. 585 of 1997 is directed against the Award of the Industrial Tribunal („Tribunal) in ID No. 56 of 1988 of 30th September 1996 as well as the Award of the same date...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOnline India Capital Co. Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Dimensions Corporate
Delhi
May-26-2000
Intellectual Property RightsCompany
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2
2000VAD(Delhi)860; [2000]102CompCas352(Delhi)
Vinay Bhasin, Sr. Adv.,; Urmil Narang and; P.K. Mittal,
K.S. Gupta, J.1. A suit was filed seeking to restrain the defendant permanently from using the website under the name of www.mutualfundindia.com or in any other identical name, inter alia, alleging that plaintiff No. 2 acquired...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Online India Capital Co. Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. M/S. Dimention Co ...
Delhi
May-26-2000
Intellectual Property Rights
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2
[2000]102CompCas362(Delhi)
Sh. Vinay Bhasin, Sr. Adv.,; Ms. Urmil Narang and; Sh. P.K.
ORDERK.S. Gupta, J.1. Suit was filed seeking to restrain the defendant permanently from using the website under the name of WWW. MUTUAL FUND INDIA. COM or in any other identical name, inter alia, alleging that plaintiff...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharat Electronics Ltd. Vs. Chief Labour Commissioner
Delhi
Dec-04-1995
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 18(3); Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 4
1996IAD(Delhi)128; 1996(36)DRJ153; (1996)IILLJ193Del
Vinay Bhasin,; P.N. Lekhi and; M.K. Garg, Advs
Usha Mehra, J. (1) M/S Bharat Electronics Ltd. is aggrieved by the impugned order passed by respondent No.1, the Appellate Authority as well as by Certifying Officer. By the impugned order they amended Clause 9.1 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.D. Ferro Alloys (P) Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking
Delhi
Jul-25-1997
Electricity
Constitution of India - Article 226
1997IVAD(Delhi)985; AIR1997Delhi17; 68(1997)DLT212; 1997(42)DRJ747
Vinay Bhasin,; H.L. Raina,; Rakesh Tikku,;
D.K. Jain, J. (1) The issue involved in this bunch of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, which we propose to dispose of by this common judgment, is identical. The petitioners have...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »