Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: vinay bhasin · Page 1 of about 81 results (0.052 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 01 2001

indraprastha Medical Corporation Ltd., Apollo Hospital Employees Union ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-01-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 3; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 2; Factories Act, 1946; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 2; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Mines Act, 1952; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Discipline Act, 1934; Employees' State of Insurance Act; Constitution of India - Article 30

Reported in : 94(2001)DLT337; 2002(63)DRJ295; [2001(90)FLR460]; (2001)IILLJ1274Del

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Vinay Bhasin, Sr. Adv.,; Mr. Amit Bhasin and; Mr. Umesh

ORDERVikramajit Sen, J.1. The short and interesting question that has arisen in these writ petitions is whether the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'), 1946, (hereinafter referred to as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 1997

S.B. Mathur Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-28-1997

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)1042; 1998(44)DRJ355

Advocate for Appellant : G.D. Gupta and ; Vinay Bhasin, Advs

Usha Mehra, J.(1) The Short points involved in this writ petition are (i) whether the rule which provides promotion on seniority-cum-merit would mean comparative merit only or seniority and then merit. (ii) whether the decision of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2003

DeseIn Private Limited Vs. Industrial Tribunal Iii and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-24-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 24, 27, 33, 33(2) and 33A and ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100

Reported in : 2004(72)DRJ365

Advocate for Appellant : Vinay Bhasin, Sr. Adv. and; Amit Bhasin, Adv

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. By the impugned order dated 12th September 2002 the Industrial Tribunal dismissed the application filed by the management/petitioner for staying the proceedings initiated by respondent No. 2/workman under Section 33 of the Industrial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 27 1993

Sehjiv Kumar Tandon Vs. Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-27-1993

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR1994Delhi202

Advocate for Appellant : Vinay Bhasin and D.K. Malhotra, Adv

ORDER1. The petitioner's grievance in this Revision petition are that the point raised by him before the learned Addl. District Judge have not been considered and that the trial Court erroneously imposed the condition while ordering...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 1991

Fouress Engineering (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-08-1991

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 17B

Reported in : 43(1991)DLT742; (1992)ILLJ710Del

Advocate for Appellant : Vinay Bhasin and; Anil Malik, Advs

M.C. Jain, J. (1) This appeal is directed against the order dated 4th August 1982, passed by the learned Single Judge in C.M. No. 1225 of 1986 in C.W.P. No. 1697 of 1982. (2) It appears...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2011

Taj Services Ltd. and anr. Vs. Industrial Tribunal-i Delhi and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-17-2011

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Factories Act; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33A, 17B, 22, 18

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Vinay Bhasin; Mr. H.L. Raina, Advs.

1. W.P. (C) No. 585 of 1997 is directed against the Award of the Industrial Tribunal („Tribunal) in ID No. 56 of 1988 of 30th September 1996 as well as the Award of the same date...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2000

Online India Capital Co. Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Dimensions Corporate

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-26-2000

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCompany

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)860; [2000]102CompCas352(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Vinay Bhasin, Sr. Adv.,; Urmil Narang and; P.K. Mittal,

K.S. Gupta, J.1. A suit was filed seeking to restrain the defendant permanently from using the website under the name of www.mutualfundindia.com or in any other identical name, inter alia, alleging that plaintiff No. 2 acquired...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2000

M/S. Online India Capital Co. Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. M/S. Dimention Co ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-26-2000

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : [2000]102CompCas362(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Sh. Vinay Bhasin, Sr. Adv.,; Ms. Urmil Narang and; Sh. P.K.

ORDERK.S. Gupta, J.1. Suit was filed seeking to restrain the defendant permanently from using the website under the name of WWW. MUTUAL FUND INDIA. COM or in any other identical name, inter alia, alleging that plaintiff...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 1995

Bharat Electronics Ltd. Vs. Chief Labour Commissioner

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-04-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 18(3); Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 4

Reported in : 1996IAD(Delhi)128; 1996(36)DRJ153; (1996)IILLJ193Del

Advocate for Appellant : Vinay Bhasin,; P.N. Lekhi and; M.K. Garg, Advs

Usha Mehra, J. (1) M/S Bharat Electronics Ltd. is aggrieved by the impugned order passed by respondent No.1, the Appellate Authority as well as by Certifying Officer. By the impugned order they amended Clause 9.1 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 1997

G.D. Ferro Alloys (P) Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-25-1997

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1997IVAD(Delhi)985; AIR1997Delhi17; 68(1997)DLT212; 1997(42)DRJ747

Advocate for Appellant : Vinay Bhasin,; H.L. Raina,; Rakesh Tikku,;

D.K. Jain, J. (1) The issue involved in this bunch of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, which we propose to dispose of by this common judgment, is identical. The petitioners have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial