Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: vikram pawar · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.039 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 05 2009

Jitender Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-05-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 109, 362, 363, 366, 366A, 372(2), 376, 376(2) and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 164, 216 and 313

Reported in : 184(2009)DLT767

Advocate for Appellant : Vikram Pawar, Adv

Mool Chand Garg, J. 1. This order shall dispose of aforementioned revision petitions filed on behalf of the petitioners who are already facing charges under Section 363/366A/376/34 IPC in Sessions Case No. 294/2007 registered vide FIR...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 1999

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Narayanram Chetanram Chaudhary and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-22-1999

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1999)101BOMLR641a

N.J. Pandya, J.1. All the three matters arise out of the judgment in Sessions Case No. 462 of 1994 of the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Pune. The judgment of conviction came to be delivered on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2000

Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-05-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 302, 342, 391, 397 and 449; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1952; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 162, 306 to 308, 313 and 337 to 339; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 114 and 133

Reported in : AIR2000SC3352; 2000(2)ALD(Cri)646; 2000CriLJ4640; JT2000(10)SC78; 2000(6)SCALE230; (2000)8SCC457; [2000]Supp3SCR104; 2000(2)LC1449(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Murlidhar and; S. Vallinayagam, Advs

R.P. Sethi, J.1. Three desperadoes, the two appellants and one Raju (PW. 2) who had gone amuck, committed the heinous crime of murders in a most ghastly and shocking manner for which the appellants were charged...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial