Advanced Search Results

In Re: Rohit Soaps and Detergents Private Limited;

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 251, 391 to 394, 394A, 394(2), 394(3), 397 and 398; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 76

Reported in : [2005]61SCL161(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Piyush Agrawal and ;Satwinder Singh, Advs.

S.P. Mahrotra, J.1. The present Company Petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been filed by Rohit Soaps & Detergents Private Limited, having its Registered Office at 117/H-2/202, Pandu Nagar, Kanpur-208005,...

In Re: Sidco Leathers Ltd. (In Liquidation)

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : [2002]109CompCas436(All)

Advocate for Appellant : G.D. Srivastava and ;Vikram Nath, Advs. for objectors, ;R.P. Agarwal, Adv. for auction purchaser and ;Shree Ram, Adv. for official liquidator

A.K. Banerji, J.1. By means of the application (A-59) filed on behalf of the company (in liquidation), it has been prayed that the confirmation of the sale of the assets of the company which were sold...

Badam Singh Vs. 8th Additional District Judge, Agra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 28

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1352

Advocate for Appellant : Vikram Nath, Adv.

Anjani Kumar, J.1. By means of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-judgment debtor has filed present writ petition against the orders dated 21.9.1999 and 27.5.1998, passed by respondent Nos....

Vivek Chaudhary Vs. Allahabad Development Authority and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2165; (2003)3UPLBEC2105

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Khare, ;Vikram Nath and ; J.K. Khanna, Advs.

Prakash Krishna, J.1. Raising a small controversy the present writ petition has been filed. The facts are not much disputed. The dispute relates to the demand notice dated 6th January, 2003 issued by the Allahabad Development...

Poonam Detergent Industries Vs. Kanpur Trading Company Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 28 and 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2004(28)PTC161(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Vikram Nath, Adv.

Rajes Kumar, J.1. The present appeal is being directed against the order dated 31.5.2001 passed by the District Judge, Kanpur Dehat on the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of C.P.C. in Original Suit...

Rishi Joshi Vs. University of Allahabad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1998)3UPLBEC2098

Advocate for Appellant : Yatindra Singh and ;Vikram Singh, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner appeared in B.A. I examination held in 1995 in Psychology, Economic and English Literaturer. He was dissatisfied with the result of Economic paper II. Therefore, he applied for scrutiny on 14.11.1996....

Randhir Singh and Anr vs National Buildings Construction Corporation D ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Prabhat Kaushik, Mr. Ashish Kumar, Mr. Rishit Kumar, Mr. Ray Vikram Nath, Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Ms. Riyal Suryanshi, Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Chaubey, Mr. Akash Chatterjee, Mr. Prabhat Signed By, Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Ms. Himanshi Singh

$~45 to 47* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 19.05.2026(45) + LPA 383/2026 & CM APPL. 33919/2026 RANDHIR SINGH AND ANR .....Appellants Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Prabhat Kaushik, Mr....

S.C Kaushik and Anr vs National Buildings Construction Corporation Del ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Prabhat Kaushik, Mr. Ashish Kumar, Mr. Rishit Kumar, Mr. Ray Vikram Nath, Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Ms. Riyal Suryanshi, Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Chaubey, Mr. Akash Chatterjee, Mr. Prabhat Signed By, Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Ms. Himanshi Singh

$~45 to 47* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 19.05.2026(45) + LPA 383/2026 & CM APPL. 33919/2026 RANDHIR SINGH AND ANR .....Appellants Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Prabhat Kaushik, Mr....

Anil Kapoor and Anr vs National Buildings Construction Corporation and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Prabhat Kaushik, Mr. Ashish Kumar, Mr. Rishit Kumar, Mr. Ray Vikram Nath, Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Ms. Riyal Suryanshi, Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Chaubey, Mr. Akash Chatterjee, Mr. Prabhat Signed By, Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Ms. Himanshi Singh

$~45 to 47* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 19.05.2026(45) + LPA 383/2026 & CM APPL. 33919/2026 RANDHIR SINGH AND ANR .....Appellants Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Prabhat Kaushik, Mr....

Vinay Kumar JaIn and ors. Vs. Official Liquidator and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 466

Reported in : 2000CriLJ136

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agarwal, Adv.;Anurag Khanna, Adv. for PICUP ; P.K. Singhal, Adv. for Syndicate Bank;Vikram Nath, Adv. for IIBI ;Pradeep Agarwal, Adv. for J.G. Finance Ltd. ; Official Liquidator for company

M.C. Jain, J.1. The company in question, M/s. Srishti Video Corporation Limited, was ordered to be wound up by order dated August 16, 1999, in this case. There were four other winding up petitions against the...