Advanced Search Results
In Re: Rohit Soaps and Detergents Private Limited;
Allahabad
Mar-31-2005
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 251, 391 to 394, 394A, 394(2), 394(3), 397 and 398; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 76
[2005]61SCL161(All)
Piyush Agrawal and ;Satwinder Singh, Advs.
S.P. Mahrotra, J.1. The present Company Petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been filed by Rohit Soaps & Detergents Private Limited, having its Registered Office at 117/H-2/202, Pandu Nagar, Kanpur-208005,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Sidco Leathers Ltd. (In Liquidation)
Allahabad
Feb-24-1999
Company
[2002]109CompCas436(All)
G.D. Srivastava and ;Vikram Nath, Advs. for objectors, ;R.P. Agarwal, Adv. for auction purchaser and ;Shree Ram, Adv. for official liquidator
A.K. Banerji, J.1. By means of the application (A-59) filed on behalf of the company (in liquidation), it has been prayed that the confirmation of the sale of the assets of the company which were sold...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBadam Singh Vs. 8th Additional District Judge, Agra and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-06-2002
Contract
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 28
2002(2)AWC1352
Vikram Nath, Adv.
Anjani Kumar, J.1. By means of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-judgment debtor has filed present writ petition against the orders dated 21.9.1999 and 27.5.1998, passed by respondent Nos....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vivek Chaudhary Vs. Allahabad Development Authority and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-26-2003
Property
2003(3)AWC2165; (2003)3UPLBEC2105
Ashok Khare, ;Vikram Nath and ; J.K. Khanna, Advs.
Prakash Krishna, J.1. Raising a small controversy the present writ petition has been filed. The facts are not much disputed. The dispute relates to the demand notice dated 6th January, 2003 issued by the Allahabad Development...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPoonam Detergent Industries Vs. Kanpur Trading Company Ltd.
Allahabad
Sep-09-2003
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 28 and 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2
2004(28)PTC161(All)
Vikram Nath, Adv.
Rajes Kumar, J.1. The present appeal is being directed against the order dated 31.5.2001 passed by the District Judge, Kanpur Dehat on the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of C.P.C. in Original Suit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRishi Joshi Vs. University of Allahabad and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-02-1998
Constitution
(1998)3UPLBEC2098
Yatindra Singh and ;Vikram Singh, Advs.
D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner appeared in B.A. I examination held in 1995 in Psychology, Economic and English Literaturer. He was dissatisfied with the result of Economic paper II. Therefore, he applied for scrutiny on 14.11.1996....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinay Kumar JaIn and ors. Vs. Official Liquidator and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-10-2000
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 466
2000CriLJ136
R.P. Agarwal, Adv.;Anurag Khanna, Adv. for PICUP ; P.K. Singhal, Adv. for Syndicate Bank;Vikram Nath, Adv. for IIBI ;Pradeep Agarwal, Adv. for J.G. Finance Ltd. ; Official Liquidator for company
M.C. Jain, J.1. The company in question, M/s. Srishti Video Corporation Limited, was ordered to be wound up by order dated August 16, 1999, in this case. There were four other winding up petitions against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShambhu Debnath versus the State of Bihar & Ors.
Supreme Court of India
Dec-20-2024
Right to Information
[2024]12S.C.R.2083
Ms. Ananya Poddar
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 2083 : 2024 INSC 1032 Shambhu Debnath v. The State of Bihar & Ors. (Criminal Appeal No. 5579 of 2024) 20 December 2024 [Vikram Nath* and Prasanna B. Varale, JJ. ] Issue for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJai Prakash versus State of Uttarakhand
Supreme Court of India
Jul-16-2025
Criminal
[2025]8S.C.R.243
Ms. Minakshi Vij
[2025] 8 S.C.R. 243 : 2025 INSC 861 Jai Prakash v. State of Uttarakhand (Criminal Appeal No(s). 331-332 of 2022) 16 July 2025 [Vikram Nath, Sanjay Karol* and Sandeep Mehta JJ.] Issue for Consideration Allegation against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsgar Ali Vs. The State Of Jammu And Kashmir
Supreme Court of India
Nov-17-2021
Education
ARPUTHAM ARUNA AND CO __ M. SHOEB ALAM
1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 6928 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP(C) No 3786 of 2016) Vinod Kumar Bhagat and Ors .... Appellant(s) Versus State of Jammu...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »