Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: vikas singh · Page 1 of about 683 results (0.104 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 16 2008

Chennai Customs Appraising Officers Assn. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-16-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Interpretation of the Customs Appraisers' Service, Class II Recruitment Rules, 1961 - Rules 3, 4, 6, 14, 15 and 16; Department of Revenue (Customs Appraisers) Recruitment Rules, 1988; Constitution of India - Article 32

Reported in : 2008(8)SCALE91; (2008)7SCC278; 2008AIRSCW6689

Advocate for Appellant : Vikas Singh, A.S.G.,; J.L. Gupta,; Brijender Chahat,;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of the Customs Appraisers' Service, Class II Recruitment Rules, 1961 (for short 'the 1961 Rules') and the Department of Revenue (Customs Appraisers) Recruitment Rules, 1988 (for short 'the 1988 Rules')...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2007

Popcorn Entertainment and anr. Vs. City Industrial Development Corpn. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-23-2007

Subject : CommercialConstitution

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 23; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005; New Bombay Land Disposal Regulations, 1975 - Regulation 4; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 226

Reported in : 2007(1)CTLJ137(SC); JT2007(4)SC70; (2007)4MLJ890(SC); 2007(3)SCALE465; (2007)9SCC593; 2007AIRSCW2010

Advocate for Appellant : Vikas Singh, ASG,; Amritam Narayan,; Yunus Malik,;

AR. Lakshmanan, J.SLP (C) No. 11085 of 20061. Leave granted.2. The above appeal was filed against the final judgment and order dated 30.06.2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in W.P. No. 9467...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2008

Citizen Forum Through Its Secretary Shri Rajiv S/O Gajanan Jagtap, Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-12-2008

Subject : Contract

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(27), 2(49), 3, 3(1), 3(4), 5, 12, 13, 14, 43, 73, 82, 86(2) and 181; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Right to Information Act (RTI); Maharashtra Essential Services Maintenance Act, 2005 - Sections 2; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 21, 39 and 226; Electricity Rules; Electricity Regulations; Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (General Conditions for Distribution Licensee) Regulations, 2006 - Regulation 8.3.7

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR598; 2008LC(BOM)309

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Kilor, ;S.M. Puranik and ;V.B. Mahant, Advs. in Writ Petition No. 3701 of 2007, ;S.R. Shinde, ;R.S. Akbani, ;A. Modi and ;S.S. Gandhi, Advs. in Writ Petition No. 5100 of 2007 and ;S.A. Gordey, ;A

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally with consent of Shri Kilor, learned Counsel for the petitioners in Writ Petition No. 3701/2007, Shri Shinde, learned Counsel for the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 5100/2007, Shri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 14 2008

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Naman Singh Sekhawat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-14-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Customs Act - Sections 108, 110 and 112; Foreigners Act - Sections 13(2); Arms Act - Sections 27; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeals) Rules, 1965 - Rules 11, 14 and 14(15); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 409 and 477A

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR(SC)404; 2008(225)ELT161(SC); [2008(118)FLR1121]; JT2008(4)SC150; 2008(4)SCALE360; (2008)4SCC1; 2008(3)SLJ294(SC); 2008AIRSCW2813; 2008(3)LH(SC)2068

Advocate for Appellant : Vikash Singh, A.S.G.,; A.K. Srivastava,; Shiva Lakshmi,;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Respondent at all material times was working as a Sub-Inspector (AICO-II). He was posted in the Intelligence Bureau. His principal function was to identify and collect sources of information from the locality in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2006

Ramesh Kumari Vs. State (N.C.T. of Delhi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-21-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 41(1), 154, 154(1), 154(3), 155, 156, 157 and 189; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1861 - Sections 139; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1872 - Sections 112

Reported in : AIR2006SC1322; 2006CriLJ1622; 2006(1)CTC666; 127(2006)DLT636(SC); JT2006(2)SC548; 2006(2)KLT404(SC); 2006(2)MPHT308; 2006(2)SCALE457; (2006)2SCC677; [2006] 2 SCR 403

Advocate for Appellant : Indu Malhotra, Adv

H.K. Sema, J.1. The challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 24.1.2002 passed by the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court. The controversy in this appeal is confined to the non-registration of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2011

Brij Pal Bhargava and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-23-2011

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 5A

1. Leave granted.2. Land owners - appellants have challenged the judgment of Allahabad High Court, challenging the dismissal of their petition, whereby they had challenged the notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 1997

Sanjay Kumar Bajpai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-12-1997

Subject : Service

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 323, 324 and 452; Army Act - Sections 13

Reported in : JT1997(3)SC83; (1997)10SCC312; 1997(1)LC510(SC); (1997)2UPLBEC1022

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dated September 13, 1993 whereby Writ Petition No. 10117 of 1989 filed by the appellant has been dismissed. In the said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 1996

Satyendra Chandra JaIn Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-15-1996

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab National Bank Officer/Employees (Disciplinary And; Appeal) Regulations, 1977 - Regulation 19

Reported in : (1997)11SCC444

S.C. Agrawal and; G.T. Nanavati, JJ.1. Special leave granted.2. Satyendra Chandra Jain, appellant herein, was employed as Branch Manager with Punjab National Bank (hereinafter referred to as “the Bank”). Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2008

Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi Vs. Sony India Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-23-2008

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 28(1), 28AB, 111, 112 and 114; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 2; Interpretative Rules - Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2008(133)ECC77; 2008(159)LC77(SC); 2008(231)ELT385(SC); 2008(12)SCALE706

Advocate for Appellant : Vikas Singh, A.S.G.,; S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Adv.,; Gaurav Agrawa

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. An Order by Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter called 'the Tribunal' for short), allowing the appeal filed by M/s Sony India Ltd. (the respondent herein), is in challenge at the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 2007

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Shardindu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-16-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 - Sections 2, 3(4), 4, 4(3), 5, 6 and 31; Constitution of India - Articles 142, 310 and 324; General Clauses Act; National Council for Teacher Education Rules, 1997 - Rules 5, 6, 7 and 9(7B); Prasar Bharati (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990; Representation of People Act, 1951; Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995; Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994

Reported in : AIR2007SC2204; 2007(6)ALLMR(SC)970; 2007(7)SCALE575; (2007)6SCC276; 2008(1)SLJ151(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Vikas Singh, ASG,; V. Mohana,; Anitha Sharma and;

A.K. Mathur, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi whereby the Division Bench of the High Court has confirmed the order passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial