Advanced Search Results

Dr. B.M. Shukla Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2003(3)MPHT373; 2003(4)MPLJ18

Advocate for Appellant : Vijay Naik, Adv.

ORDERShantanu Kemkar, J.1. Heard Shri Vijay Naik, learned Counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission.2. By filing this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has called in question...

Sanjay Kumar Agrawal Vs. Arjun Kumar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 85, 110-B, 110-CC and 110-D

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT59

Advocate for Appellant : Vijay Naik, Adv.

1. This appeal is directed against the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Narsinghpur, in Claim Case No. 3/89, dated 20-1-1993.2. Accident took place on 29-6-1988 when claimant was going to the scooter of...

Kalyan Alias Dalya Shiva Shinde Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Oral Judgment: These two appeals by the original accused Nos.1, 2 and 5 in Maharashtra Control of Organised Act, 1999 (Hereinafter referred to as MCOC Act) Special Case Nos.23 of 2007 and 6 of 2008 are...

Mohammad Sartaj Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27; Explosives Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3 and 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 37, 120B, 147, 148 and 149; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 24(8), 225, 301(2), 319, 321 and 482; Maharashtra Law Officers Appointment (Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 1984 - Rule 22

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2133; 2005(2)MPLJ136

Advocate for Appellant : Asadulla Usmani, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. The petitioner along with some others is facing trial for commission of offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 37 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'the IPC') under Sections...

Dinesh Shrivastava Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Vijay Naik

Cr.R.No.392/2008 2.4.2013 Shri Vijay Naik, counsel for the applicant. Shri Prakash Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The applicant has challenged the order dated 4.2.2008 passed by the learned Additional...

Rajendra Singh and anr. Vs. Tulsa Bai

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 27

Reported in : I(1996)DMC572

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Vijay Naik

N.P. Singh, J.1. This appeal, as well as First Appeal No. 363 of 1995, arise out of the same judgment and decree dated 25.11.1994 passed by the Additional District judge, Narsinghpur in Civil Suit No. 3-A...

Kaliram Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Anand Naik

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Revision No.380/1999 Kali Ram VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Vijay Naik, Advocate with Shri Anand Naik, counsel for...

Ojharam Evane Vs. Jyoti Dhurve

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

E.P.No.46/2009 21.9.2012 Shri Manikant Sharma, Advocate along with petitioner Ojharam Evne present. Shri R.N.Singh, learned Senior Advocate with Shri A.J.Pawar, counsel for respondent no.1. Shri Vijay Naik, counsel for respondent no.4. Petitioner Ojharam Evne is present....

Sunil Vs. State

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 306; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 397 and 401

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT82

Advocate for Appellant : Vijay Naik, Adv.

ORDERN.S. Azad, J.1. Arguments heard.2. On 18th September, 2001, Sessions Judge, Narsinghpur, framedcharge against this petitioner for offence punishable under Section 306 of the IPC giving rise to this revision.3. As per the prosecution case, the...

Biharilal Jaiswal Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 3, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 10(3), 11, 52, 52(1), 69, 70 and 70(2); Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Service (Recruitment and General Conditions of Services) Rules, 1999 - Rules 3, 27 and 34; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1956 - Sections 58 (5) and (6); Constitution of India (Amendment) Act, 1992 - Article 243 to 243-O

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT25

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, ;Ms Malti Dadaria and ;Shri Vivek Naik, Advs.

ORDERC.K. Prasad, J. 1. In all these writ petitions common questions of law and fact arise and, as such, they are being disposed of together.2. Facts lie in a narrow compass. Petitioners are aggrieved by their...