Advanced Search Results

Dial Singh Vs. Amrish Kumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Land Restrictions Act, 1949 - Section 13

Reported in : 1994Supp(3)SCC697

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Venkataramani

K. Ramaswamy and; N.P. Singh, JJ.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge of Punjab and Haryana High Court in Civil Revision No. 1258 of 1984 dated May...

N. Jagadeesan, Etc. Vs. District Collector, North Arcot and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR1997SC1197; JT1997(2)SC746; (1997)117PLR598; 1997(2)SCALE219; (1997)4SCC508; [1997]2SCR340; 1997(1)LC584(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. R. Venkataramani

ORDERB.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. Leave granted in the Special Leave Petition.2. A common question arises in these writ petitions and civil appeals.3. The National Association of Education Self-Employed Youth (NAESEY) is the petitioner in Writ Petition...

C. Chandramohan Vs. Sengottaiyan (Dead) by Lrs. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 116; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 8(5), 10(2), 14(1) and 25; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 111

Reported in : AIR2000SC569; 2000(1)CTC239; JT2000(1)SC18; (2000)IIMLJ1(SC); 2000(1)SCALE8; (2000)1SCC451; [2000]1SCR16

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. These three appeals, by special leave, arise out of the common judgment of the High Court of Madras in C.R.Ps. 3796 to 3798 of 1994 dated November 17, 1997. The common...

Sri Kant Tripathi and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975 - Rules 3, 4, 4(2), (3) and (4), 5, 6, 7, 8, 8(1) and (2), 16, 17, 18, 18(2), (3) and (4), 20, 20(4) and (5), 21, 22 and 22(1), (2), (3) and (4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 32, 142, 233 and 309; Recruitment Rules, 1953; Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1978 - Sections 13(4)

Reported in : 2001VIIAD(SC)427; AIR2001SC3757; 2001(4)ALLMR(SC)489; [2002(92)FLR297]; JT2001(7)SC519; 2001LabIC3337; 2001(6)SCALE162; 2001(4)SCT361(SC); (2001)3UPLBEC2401

Advocate for Appellant : Yogeshwar Prasad,; P.P. Rao,; Dinesh Dwivedi,;

Pattanaik, J.1. This batch of cases deals with the dispute between the direct recruits and the promotees in the cadre of U.P. Higher Judicial Service comprising of posts borne in Class I. U.P. Higher Judicial Service...

Brindavathi. Vs. the Director General of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Services [D And A] Rules. - Rule 3[b], 17[a], 17[b]; Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.K.Venkataramani, Adv

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion as Inspector of Police for the year...

O. Konavalov Vs. Commander, Coast Guard Region and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceCustoms

Acts : Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3(15), 125, 138, 139, 140, 141, 144, 145, 445 and 529; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 30, 110, 112, 115, 115(2) and 126; Constitution of India - Articles 4 and 21; Contract Act - Sections 172, 173 and 176; Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1970 - Sections 16(1); Maritime Regulations

Reported in : 2006(2)CTC672; 2006(197)ELT3(SC); JT2006(3)SC567; 2006(3)SCALE398; (2006)4SCC620

Advocate for Appellant : R. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv.,; Ashok Panigrahi and; V. Mohana

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. The above two appeals were filed against the final judgment and order dated 10.01.2001 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in O.S.A. Nos. 309 and 350 of 2000 whereby the...

T.Manivannan, and ors. Vs. the Director General of Police, and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Venkataramani, Adv.

1. The writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking an order in the nature of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent passed in...

Michael B. Fernandes Vs. C.K. Jaffer Sharief and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 61, 61A, 67, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 86, 86(4), 86(6), 87, 100, 100(1), 101 and 116A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order I, Rule 10; Conduct of Election Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 324

Reported in : AIR2002SC1041; JT2002(2)SC87; 2002(2)SCALE157; (2002)3SCC521; [2002]1SCR1053

Advocate for Appellant : R. Venkataramani and; Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Advs.,; Vimal Chand

This appeal is directed against the Order dated 16th June, 2000, passed in Election Petition No. 29 of 1999. The aforesaid Election Petition had been filed by the appellant, challenging the validity of the election to...

Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune Vs. Abhi Chemicals and Pharmaceut ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 2005(99)ECC65; 2005(181)ELT351(SC); (2005)3SCC541

Advocate for Appellant : R. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv.,; A. Subba Rao,; Ashok Panigrahi

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. This civil appeal is directed against the judgment and final order No. 243/99-D in Appeal No. E/2546/93-D dated 11.03.1999 passed by the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (for short 'the CEGAT')...

J. Jayalalithaa Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 35B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 244, 245(1), 245(2) and 309

Reported in : [2008]300ITR399(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Venkataramani, Adv. for ;N. Jothi, Adv.

K. Mohan Ram, J.1. The brief facts that are necessary for the disposal of the above criminal original petition are set out below:(i) The respondent herein preferred a complaint against the petitioner under Section 35B of...