Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: venkatachalapathy · Page 1 of about 894 results (0.286 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 04 1979

Board of Revenue U.P. Vs. Auto Sales, Allahabad

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-04-1979

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(10) - Schedule - Article 23; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 14 and 15

Reported in : AIR1979All312

Advocate for Appellant : Standing Counsel

K.C. Agrawal, J. 1. This is a reference under Section 57 of the Indian Stamp Act. The questions referred are: 1. Whether on the facts and circumstances stated above, the document Annexure 'A' is a conveyance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 1990

M. HussaIn and Etc. Vs. Bharathiyar University, Coimbatore and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-04-1990

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : AIR1991Mad45; (1991)IMLJ163

Advocate for Appellant : C. Chinnasamy, for M/s. R. Thamodaran and ;P. Natarajan, ;Mrs. Uma Vijaya Kumar and ;P. Ananthakrishnan, Advs.

ORDER1. The prayer in the Writ Petition No. 9555 is as follows:--'.....to issue a writ, order or direction and more specifically a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to forbear from preventing the continuance of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 1999

H.H. Rijhwani Vs. N. Venkat Ramani and Either Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-08-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Order 30, 39, Rule 1 and 3; Constitution of India -- Article 227

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC13a; (1999)3MLJ750

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A. Alagirisamy, Senior Counsel Adv.

ORDER1. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for either side in both the revision petitions, the revision petitions are taken up today for final disposal and they are disposed of.2. Heard Mr.K. Alagirisami senior...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 16 2026

Pratheek @ T Vidya Sagar Reddy vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-16-2026

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. K.P.Venkatachalapathi

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 109 OF 2026 (438(Cr.PC) / 482(BNSS)) BETWEEN: PRATHEEK @ T VIDYA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1994

Dindigul Anna District Tax Payers Sangam Represented by Its President, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-21-1994

Subject : TenancyMunicipal Tax

Reported in : (1995)2MLJ43

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M. Venkatachalapathy

ORDERSomasundaram, J.1. The petitioner in Writ Petition Nos. 1946 of 1994 and 3118 of 1994 is Dindigul Anna District Tax Payers Sangam represented by its President and they are filed for the issue of a writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2002

P.A. Niranzena (Minor) Rep. by Her Father and Guardian D. Panneerselva ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-19-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2002)3MLJ150

Advocate for Appellant : M. Venkatachalapathy, Senior Counsel for Mr. M. Sriram

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J. 1. By consent of both parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. Aggrieved by the order of the Joint Director, Government Examinations, Chennai 6 - first respondent herein...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2007

Govindaraj Vs. Tmt. H. Suraj Bai and Devdass Nadar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-20-2007

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 10(3); Tamil Nadu Building (Lease and Rent Control) (Amendment) Act, 1973; Tamil Nadu Building (Lease and Rent Control) Rules, 1974 - Rule 11(3)

Reported in : (2008)1MLJ552

Advocate for Appellant : M. Venkatachalapathi, Sr. Counsel for R.M. Sriram, Adv.

ORDERA.C. Arumugaperumal Adityan, J.1. This revision has been preferred against the judgment in RCA. No. 1228 of 2005 on the file of the VII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai, which had arisen out of the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2001

S and S Industrial and Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-27-2001

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 15(1) and 22

Reported in : [2001]106CompCas624(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : M. Venkatachalapathy and ;B. Natarajan, Advs.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. This writ petition is placed before me as per the orders of the Chief Justice, dated 5-2-2001.2. This writ petition has been filed for the issue of a writ of declaration to declare...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2012

K. Saravanan and Another Vs. M/S. Cosmopolis Properties Pvt. Ltd, Rep ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-31-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appearing Parties: M. Venkatachalapathy, Senior Counsel for S. Xavier Felix, R2, T.V. Ramanujan, Senior Counsel for R. Venkatavaradhan, M.V. Venkataseshan, Advocates.

C.R.P (PD) No.2009 of 2012 (Prayer: Civil Revision Petition to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.410 of 2011 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif, Salem. C.R.P (PD) No.2833 of 2012 Civil Revision Petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 1998

Arulmigu Sivaganga Samasthanam, Rep. by Its Manager Vs. the Commission ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-16-1998

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951, 1959 -- Sections 21 and 64(5); Sivaganga Devasthanam Administrative Staff Servi e Rules 1971 -- Rule 22

Reported in : 1999(1)CTC60; (1999)IMLJ669

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M. Venkatachalapathy Senior Counsel for ;Mr. S.M. Loganathan Adv.

ORDER1. The writ petitions are for the issue of writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent in R.P.Nos.39 & 44 of 1989 respectively dated 18.9.1990 and quash...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial