Advanced Search Results
Kothari Industrial Corporation Ltd. Vs. Lazor Detergents (P.) Ltd. and ...
Chennai
Apr-07-1994
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 81, 82, 108, 108(1), (A) and (H), 111, 111(4) and 155; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 22(A), (A(3)), (A(4)) and (A(6)); MRTP Act, 1969 - Sections 30(A) and (G)
[1994]81CompCas669(Mad)
R. Vedantham Srinivasan, ;K. Parasaran, ;C.A. Sundaram, ;K.P. Sivasubramaniam, ;N. Kumar and ;P. Seshadri, Advs.
Swamidurai, J. 1. These appeals are filed against the common order dated October 20, 1993, passed by the Company Law Board, Southern Region Bench at Madras, in C.P. Nos. 1 to 11/111/SRB of 1993. The first...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhoday Distilleries Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the Companie ... Overruled
Chennai
Oct-12-2007
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 9, 11, 32, 35, 46, 56, 109 and 109(5); Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 137; Customs Act - Sections 11; Imports and Exports Control Act, 1947; Geographical Indication of Goods Act, 1999 - Sections 26; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 191; Trade Marks Rules
LC2007(3)409; 2008(36)PTC315(Mad)
Vedantham Srinivasan, Adv. for; C. Hanumantha Rao, Adv.
K. Mohan Ram, J.1. This appeal has been filed under Section 109 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 25.09.1998...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalyani Sundaram Vs. Shardlow India Ltd. and ors.
Chennai
Oct-14-1988
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 108 and 155; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 19 and 22
[1990]67CompCas306(Mad)
Vedantham Srinivasan, Adv.
Mohan, J.1. These appeals arise out of the common judgment of Ramaprasada Rao J., as he then was, rendered in company petitions Nos. 27 to 31 of 1976. A common question arose in all those petitions....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Alagammai and Others Vs. V. Rakkamal
Chennai
Mar-21-1991
Family
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 273 and 278; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 13; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 41 and 42
AIR1992Mad136; I(1993)DMC322
R. Vedantham Srinivasan, Sr. Counsel and ;K.R. Thiagarajan, Advs.
ORDERNainar Sundaram, J.1. Defendants 1 to 5 in O. S. No. 32 of 1976, on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Sivaganga, are the appellants in this Letters Patent Appeal. The respondent herein is the plaintiff...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Kumar Kedia Vs. Balaji Builders and Another
Chennai
Aug-29-1989
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 148 - Order 21, Rules 84 and 85 - Order 26, Rule 15; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 457(1)
AIR1990Mad232
Vedantham Srinivasan, Adv.
ORDER1. These petitioners are filed to set aside the Order dated 20-4-1989 in O.S. No. 87 of 1989 and to implead the petitioner herein as second respondent in the appeal, O.S. No. 87 of 1989 came...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVee Cee Yes Granites Chennai, Rep. by Its Partner K.C. Ragunathan Vs. ...
Chennai
Apr-10-2000
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 4, 9 and 10 -- Order 2, Rule 2 (3) and Order 8, Rule 6 (2) (A); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 -- Sections 3 (1), 17 and 18; Constitution of India -- Articles 226 and 227; Bengal Agricultural Debtors Act -- Sections 34
[2001]104CompCas37(Mad); 2000(2)CTC664; (2000)IIMLJ392
Mr. Vedantham Srinivasan for ;Mr. S. Subbiah, Adv.
ORDER1. Vee Cee Yes Granites, Chennai, the plaintiff/applicant has filed this petition under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to stay the proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal at Chennai. 2. The prayer...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG. Kumarasamy Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and 3 ors.
Chennai
Dec-18-1996
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 217 and 226
1997(3)CTC437
Vedantham Srinivasan, Adv. for ;V. Sivakumar, Adv.
ORDERThanikkachalam, J.1. The petitioner in W.P. No. 16042 of 1996 is the appellant herein. The appellant herein filed the aforesaid writ petition for a writ of mandamus to forbear the first respondent herein from issuing a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Ravishankar Prasad, A. Sai Vs. Prasad Productions Private
Company Law Board CLB
Sep-01-2005
Land Acquisition
(2007)135CompCas416
1. The petitioners constituting more than one-tenth of the total number of members of M/s Prasad Productions Private Limited ("the Company") have filed this company petition under Sections 235, 397, 398, Schedule XI read with Sections...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKamakshiamman Coop Spinning Mills Vs. Kakkera Brothers
Chennai
Apr-12-2013
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :12. 04.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice M.JAICHANDREN and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH M.P.No.1/2012 in Rev.Appln.SR.No.91625/2012 in OSA.No.56/2006, Original Side Appeal Nos.71 of 2007 and 167 to 173...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Indian Bank, Madras Vs. S. Krishnaswamy and Others
Chennai
Feb-15-1989
Contract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 62, 133, 134, 136, 139, 140, 141, 143, 153 and 171; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 4 - Order 8, Rule 6
AIR1990Mad115
ORDERBakthavatsalam, J.1. The defendants appeal from a common Judgment of Shanmukham, J., in C.S. Nos. 31 and 33 of 1974.2. Originally these suits were instituted inthe City Civil Court, Madras, and were transferred to this Court....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »