Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: valmiki mehta · Page 1 of about 109 results (0.063 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 14 2009

Alkem Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Mega International (P) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-14-2009

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCivil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 10

Reported in : LC2010(1)61; 2009(41)PTC302(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : Valmiki Mehta, Sr. Adv.; Sushant Singh an; Manav Kumar, Advs

V.K. Shali, J.1. This is a Regular First Appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 08.2.2007 passed by the learned Single Judge in Civil Suit bearing No. 1926/2003 titled Alkem Laboratories Ltd. v. Mega...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 2005

S.L. Raina Vs. Sunil Bhatt

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-09-2005

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6 Rule 17; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 120(2005)DLT701; 2005(82)DRJ565

Advocate for Appellant : Valmiki Mehta, Sr. Adv. and; Rajeev Sharma, Adv

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. Rule. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing. 2. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India (hereinafter referred to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 1999

Rama Kanta JaIn Vs. M.S. JaIn and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-24-1999

Subject : LimitationProperty

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 65

Reported in : 1999IIIAD(Delhi)32; AIR1999Delhi281; 1999(50)DRJ232; ILR1999Delhi232

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Valmiki Mehta, Adv

ORDERMohd. Shamim, J.1. This is a suit for recovery of possession over a portion of the property bearing No. 49/7, Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi, shown by red colour in the plan annexed with the plaint (hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 24 2005

National Institute of Banking Studies and Corporation Management (Nibs ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-24-2005

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9, 11, 16, 16(1), 16(2), 16(3), 16(5), 17, 23, 34, 37 and 37(2); Arbitration Act 1940 - Sections 33

Reported in : 2005(2)ARBLR200(Delhi); 120(2005)DLT563

Advocate for Appellant : Valmiki Mehta, Sr. Adv. and; M.K. Chaudhary, Adv

R.C. Jain, J.1. This appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter called as the 'Act') is directed against the Order of the Sole Arbitrator {Mr. justice, C.L. Chaudhary (Retd)} dated 6.2.2004,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2008

Sagar Warehousing Corporation Vs. Pawan Hans Helicopters Limited,

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-11-2008

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9 and 9(2); Sales of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 9 and 19(1)

Reported in : AIR2009Delhi8; 2008(3)ARBLR356(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Valmiki Mehta, Sr. Adv.,; Lalita Kohli and; Charu, Advs

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. By this common judgment, two appeals namely FAO(OS) 258/2008 filed by M/s Sagar Warehousing Corporation and FAO(OS) 259/2008 filed by M/s Fly Jac Forwarders (now known as Fly Jac Logistic Pvt. Ltd.) are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2005

Vogel Medial International Gmbh and anr. Vs. Jasu Shan and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-05-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rules 7, 16 and 17 - Order 8, Rule 1 - Order 22, Rule 10

Reported in : 2005(31)PTC578(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : Valmiki Mehta, Sr. Adv. and; Swetashree Majumdar, Adv

R.C. Jain, J.1. Defendants have made this application under Order 6 Rule 7, Order 6 Rule 16 and Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151, CPC with the following prayers--(i) that the amended plaint filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 1996

Mohar Singh Vs. Deen Dayal Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-11-1996

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 40; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91

Reported in : 1996VAD(Delhi)704; 65(1997)DLT1; 2003(39)DRJ760

Advocate for Appellant : Valmiki Mehta and; M.L. Lonial, Advs

R.C. Lahoti, J. (1) Plaintiffs have come up in appeal feeling aggrieved by an order dated 22.3.96 passed by. a learned Single Judge of this Court whereby the plaintiff's application (IA 3862/95) under Order 39 Rules...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2006

Vikas JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-17-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 5(1); Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Amendment Act, 1980; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Institute of Technology Act, 1961; Major Port Trusts Act, 1963; Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 - Sections 79; Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 - Sections 79 and 80(6); Cantonments Act, 1924

Reported in : 2006(90)DRJ100

Advocate for Appellant : Valmiki Mehta, Sr. Adv.,; P. Jauhar and; Sumit Kalra, A

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. Rule.2. Final opportunity to file Counter Affidavits within the time permitted by the Court has not been availed of. The factual matrix raises no controversy. The petition is taken up for final disposal.3....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 2004

Pearey Lal and Sons (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Jamuna Properties (P) Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-13-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 37, 38, 39(1) and 39(2)

Reported in : AIR2004Delhi126

Advocate for Appellant : Valmiki Mehta, Sr. Adv.,; P.K. Mishra, Adv. for Decree Holder and;

ORDERManmohan Sarin, J.1. By Notification No. L-17015/1/2002-Jus. dated 18th July, 2003, the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Original Side of Delhi High Court has been increased from Rs. 5 lakhs to Rs. 20 lakhs.2. The questions falling...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 2003

Airogo Travel and Cargo Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-16-2003

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2004IAD(Delhi)440; 2004(1)CTLJ220(Del); 110(2004)DLT395; 2003(70)DRJ757

Advocate for Appellant : Valmiki Mehta Sr. Adv. and; Rahul Srivastava, Adv

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. Rule. With the consent of the parties the matter is taken up for final hearing and disposal.2. The present petition relates to the export cargo handling services at Indira Gandhi International Airport...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial