Advanced Search Results

V. Parameswara Iyer Vs. Canara Bank

Court : Chennai

Subject : BankingCompany

Reported in : [2000]101CompCas424(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Vaidyanathan, Adv. for;Row and Reddy,;R. Vaigai and;M. Gnana Sekar, Advs.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the order of the first respondent confirming the order of the second respondent imposing punishment of censure and ordering recovery of a sum of Rs....

Jeevaraj Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 110, 110(2), 124 and 124(4); Gold (Control) Act, 1968

Reported in : 1993(64)ELT374(Kar); 1993(1)KarLJ169

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Vaidyanathan, Sr. Adv. and ;Shri J. Jeshtamal, Adv.

Acts/Rules/Orders:Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 110, 110(2), 124 and 124(4); Gold (Control) Act, 1968Cases Referred:AC Cus v. Malhotra, 1973 June Cen-Cus (i) (SC), 1990 (28) ECR 439 (SC), ECR C Cus 790 SC;IJ Rao v. Bibhuti...

Frank Anthony Public School Employees' Association Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 23, 30, 30(1) and 337; Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 8

Reported in : AIR1987SC311; 1987LabIC427; 1987MhLJ1(SC); 1986(2)SCALE805; (1986)4SCC707; [1987]1SCR238

Advocate for Appellant : C.S. Vaidyanathan,; M.K.S. Menon and; S.R. Bhatt, Advs

O. Chinnappa Reddy, J. 1. The scales of pay and other conditions of service of teachers and other employees of the Frank Anthony Public School New Delhi compare very unfavourably with those of their counterparts of...

Dr. Ashok Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 17, 26, 27 and 36; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 39, 41 and 42; Clean Air Acts

Reported in : AIR1997SC2298; JT1997(5)SC151; 1997(3)SCALE782; (1997)5SCC10; [1997]Supp1SCR14; 1997(2)LC127(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Bhat, Additional Solicitor General,; C.S. Vaidyanathan,; K

ORDERG.B. Pattanaik, J.1. On the basis of a letter by one Dr. Ashok addressed to the Chief Justice of India indicating therein that several insecticides, colour additives, food additives are in widespread use in this country...

Union of India Vs. Telecom Regulatory

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 4(1) and 8; Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 2(J), 11(1), 12 and 15(5); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 2(23)

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)209; 74(1998)DLT282; 1998(46)DRJ557

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Soli J. Sorabji, Attorney General of India,; Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, Addl. Solicitor General and;

ORDERUsha Mehra, J. 1. Two vital questions have been raised in these appeals; one pertaining to the powers of the Government to grant or revoke license vis-a-vis the extent and ambit of the powers and functions...

M. Ahamedkutty Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1), 9 and 9(1); Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Customs Act

Reported in : 1990(47)ELT188(SC); JT1990(1)SC143; (1990)2SCC1; [1990]1SCR209

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Setia;C.S. Vaidyanathan an; K.V. Viswanathan, Advs

K.N. Saikia, J.1. Special leave granted.2. After the Appellant landed at Trivandrum Airport from Abu Dhabi, he was intercepted by the customs officials detecting that he smuggled 13 gold sheets weighing 1280 gms. valued at Rs.4,26,240...

Management Committee of Montfort Senior Secondary School Vs. Shri Vija ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceArbitration

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; ;Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 8 to 11, 12, 11(1), 14, 15, 15(1) and 15(3); ;Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(4), 5, 8, 8(1) and 15(3); Montfort School Staff Rules - Rules 24 and 31; Service Rules; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 30, 30(1), 32, 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR2005SC3549; 2005(3)ARBLR243(SC); 123(2005)DLT188(SC); [2006(108)FLR222]; JT2005(8)SC279; (2005)7SCC472; 2006(1)SLJ153(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Gogna,; Rahul Pratap,; R.C. Kohli and;

Arijit Pasyat, J. 1. Judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court holding that the Delhi School Tribunal (in short the 'Tribunal') while hearing appeal of a dismissed employee of the appellant-school preferred...

Jeevaraj and Another Vs. Collector of Customs and Central Excise and O ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Company

Acts : Gold Control Act, 1968 - Sections 79; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 110 and 124

Reported in : [1994]80CompCas478(Kar); 1993(41)ECC348; 1993LC601(Karnataka); 1993(64)ELT374(Kar); 1993(1)KarLJ167

Advocate for Appellant : J. Jeshtamal, Adv.

P.K. Shyamsundar, J.1. This is a reference made by our brethren B. P. Singh and K. Jagannatha Shetty JJ. (see Jeevaraj v. Collector of customs and Central Excise [1993] 1 Kar LJ 167) under section 7...

State of Kerala Vs. Aravind Ramakant Modawdakar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Kerala Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1976; Kerala Finance Act, 1994(Amended) - Sections 4, 22 and 74; Constitution of India - Article 14 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1999SC2970b; JT1999(5)SC588; 1999(3)KLT115(SC); 1999(4)SCALE680; (1999)7SCC400

ORDERSantosh Hegde, J.1. The State of Kerala has preferred these appeals against the judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala dated 11.12.1995 in W.A. No. 1180/1995 and other connected appeals whereby the...

Stracon India Ltd. Vs. Utv Software Communication Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act - Sections 7, 11, 13 and 16; Indian Arbitration and Reconciliation Act, 1996; Negotiable of the Instruments Act - Sections 138

Reported in : AIR2002Delhi209; 2002(62)DRJ829

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Neeraj Kaul and; Mr. Anish Dayal, Advs

ORDERJ.D. KAPOOR, J.1. Through this application under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act the petitioner has sought the appointment of the Arbitrator on the basis of the agreement dated 25.3.98. Clause 18 of the said agreement...