Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v v radhakrishnan · Page 1 of about 30 results (0.151 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 23 2016

M/s. Al Rostamani International Exchange, Represented by its Head Inte ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-23-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: O.S.A.No.281 of 2009 filed under Order 36 Rule 1 of O.S.Rules r/w Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order passed by this Court in Company Application No.2296 of 2008 in C.P.No.17 of 2004...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 1956

S.T. Sahib Vs. N. Hasan Ghani Sahib and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-10-1956

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33, 157 and 158; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 476; Legal Practitioners Act - Sections 13

Reported in : AIR1957Mad646

Advocate for Appellant : K. Rajah Iyer and ;R. Rangachari, Advs.

Ramaswami, J. 1. These are connected appeals directed against the decrees and judgments of the learned Subordinate Judge of Tirunelveli in O. S. Nos. 113 of 1950 and 25 of 1951.2. The facts are: The first...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2004

Vijayaraj Vs. Githeyon Raj and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-03-2004

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138

Reported in : [2004]122CompCas393(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : D. Stephen, Adv.;Public Prosecutor

R. Banumathi, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order of acquittal in S. T. C. No. 2445 of 1991 of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pad-manabhapuram. By the judgment dated April 16, 1992, the first respondent/...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 02 1958

The Public Prosecutor Vs. V.M. Ramalingam Pillai

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-02-1958

Subject : Sales TaxCriminal

Reported in : AIR1958Mad544; (1958)IIMLJ243; [1958]9STC510(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Adv. General and ;V.V. Radhakrishnan, Adv. for ;Public Prosecutor

ORDER1. On the answer returned by the Full Bench the acquittal by the lower Court cannot stand. The acquittal is set aside, and the accused is convicted for an offence punishable under Section 15(b) of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 1964

Public Prosecutor Vs. P. Ramaswamy Nadar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-31-1964

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madras General Sates Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 15(2), 16A and 45(2)

Reported in : AIR1964Mad443

Advocate for Appellant : V.V. Radhakrishnan, Adv. for ;Public Prosecutor

Kailasam, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the Public Prosecutor against the acquittal of the respondent, of an offence Under Section 15 (2) (a) and (d) of the Madras General Sales-tax Act 1939 read with Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 1998

Abdul Jamil and 5 Others Vs. the Secretary, Income-tax Department, New ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-26-1998

Subject : direct taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 -- Sections 28, 222, 281 and 287 (as amended 1975) -- Rule 2, 16(2), 48 and 51 Schedule II; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 53 and 100; Income Tax Rules, Rules 2 and 16 -- Schedule II; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) -- Sections 64

Reported in : 1998(1)CTC547

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. Swaminathan, Adv.

ORDER1 The unsuccessful plaintiffs are the appellants herein. They filed the suit O.S.No.226 of 1975 on the file of the Sub-Court, Dindugul for declaration that the purchase made by one Haji Mohammed Rahamathulla Rowther on 27.6.68...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 1956

In Re: Abdul Salam

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-25-1956

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Madras Prevention of Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rules 28 and 37; Madras Prevention of Adulteration Act, 1918 - Sections 5(1); Prevention of Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2 and 25(2)

Reported in : AIR1957Mad268; 1957CriLJ516

Advocate for Appellant : N.C. Ragavachari, Adv.;V.V. Radhakrishnan, Adv. for ;Public Prosecutor

ORDERRamaswami, J.1. This criminal revision is directed against the conviction and sentence pi the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Tirupattur in G. C. No. 71 of 1956. 2. The (acts are: The Sanitary Inspector of Vaniyambadi purchased...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1963

In Re: S. Sanjeevaraya Setty

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-04-1963

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1964Mad8; 1964CriLJ47

Advocate for Appellant : V. Veeraraghavachariar and ;C. Pitchiah, Advs.;V.V. Radhakrishnan, Adv. for ;Public Prosecutor

ORDERKailasam, J.1. In all the three revisions the same question of law arises and can be dealt with together. In Crl. R. C. No. 1202 of 1961, when P. W. 1 inspected the premises, he found...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 1963

R. Subramaniam Vs. Commissioner of Police

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-07-1963

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 1(2), 4, 5(2), 6, 386, 387, 435, 439 and 561A; Madras Criminal Rules of Practice - Rule 290A, 290A(7), 290A(8) and 290A(9); Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1125 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR1964Mad185; 1964CriLJ519

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Ramaswami, Adv.;V.V. Radhakrishnan, Adv. for ;Public Prosecutor and ;The Govt. Pleader and ;T.N.C. Rangarajan, Adv.

ORDERKailasam, J.1. This petition is filed under Section 561-A Criminal Procedure Code to call for the warrant issued in S. T. 336 of 1960 on the file of the Additional First Class Magistrate, Ernakulam, which was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 1958

In Re: T.P. Chakrapani Chetty

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-14-1958

Subject : CriminalCommercial

Acts : Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1959Mad350; 1959CriLJ1086; (1959)1MLJ143

Advocate for Appellant : V.V. Radhakrishnan, Adv. for Public Prosecutor

ORDERRamaswami, J.1. This is a reference made by the District Magistrate (Judicial), North Arcot, at Vellore, in the following circumstances.2. The Wireless Licence Inspector, Vellore, filed a complaint against the accused herein in the Court of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial