Advanced Search Results

Shivaji and ors. Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18 and 19; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22, Rules 3 and 4

Reported in : 2003(1)ALLMR633; 2003(1)BomCR108; (2003)1BOMLR691; 2002(4)MhLj778

Advocate for Appellant : V.V. Deo, Adv.

V.G. Palshikar, J. 1. This revision application is directed against the order dated 4-1-1996 rejecting an application by the present applicants for substitution of their names as legal representatives of one Janglu, who was the original...

Gajanan S/O Govind Mokalkar Vs. Jagdeo S/O Ganpat Warankar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR648; 2006(3)MhLj278

Advocate for Appellant : V.V. Deo, Adv.

R.C. Chavan, J.1. This second appeal by the original plaintiff was admitted for considering the following four substantial questions of law:(i) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, issue as regards tenancy bona fide...

Benisham Mohanlal Khetan Vs. Mahadeo Tukaram Borkar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 7, Rule 19

Reported in : AIR1985Bom462; 1986(2)BomCR352

Advocate for Appellant : V.V. Deo,;W.G. Deo and;Y.D. Ramteke, Advs.

V.A. Mohta, J.1. This reference has been made to resolve a conflict on a point -Can a Civil Court under O. 6, R. 17 of the Civil P. C. allow the plaint to he so amended...

Benisham Mohanlal Khetan Vs. Mahadeo Tukaram Borkar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 7, Rule 10

Reported in : (1987)87BOMLR397; 1985MhLJ616

Advocate for Appellant : V.V. Deo, ;W.G. Deo and ;Y.D. Ramtake, Advs.

V.A. Mohta, J.1. This reference has been made to resolve a conflict on a point-Can a Civil Court under Order 6, Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code allow the plaint to be so amended as...

Pandurang Ganpatrao Welekar and ors. Vs. the Sub-divisional Officer, N ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1955 - Sections 226(2); Land Acquisiton Act, 1894 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR1976Bom115

Advocate for Appellant : V.V. Deo, Adv.

Lalit, J. 1. This petition seeks to challenge the two notifications under the Land Acquisition Act. The first challenge is to the notification which was issued on May 27, 1966 under Section 4 of the Land...

M/S. Kothari and Co. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 21, 30, 34(3) and 85; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 16, 17 and 33; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 114

Reported in : 1999(4)BomCR402

Advocate for Appellant : S.U. Kamdar, Adv., i/by ;M/s. Purnanand & Co.

ORDERF. I. Rebello, J. 1. Both these Motions are being taken together as disposal of one will have the effect on disposing the other. 2. The petitioners in Notice of Motion No. 2411 of 1998 were...