Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v v asokan · Page 1 of about 296 results (0.100 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 09 2012

Moksha Foods and Beverages (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala, Represented b ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-09-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: V.V. Asokan, Sunil Shanker, Advocates. For the Respondent: N. Sudheesh Kumar, Senior Government Pleader.

1. Common question of law is involved in both these cases. 2. The petitioner in W.P(C) No. 2914 of 2009 is having a manufacturing unit outside the State of Kerala and is doing business by sale...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2011

A. Kunjuraman Vs. the Comptroller and Auditor General of India, Govern ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Jul-05-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: T.C. Govindasamy, Advocate. For the Respondents: V.V. Asokan, Advocate.

HON'BLE Mr. K. GEORGE JOSEPH, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER1. The applicant in this O.A is a Senior Auditor in the office of the Principal Accountant General (Audit), Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram. He had participated in certain programmes of protest held...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2011

Hassan T.A. and Others Vs. the Comptroller and Auditor General of Indi ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Sep-02-2011

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicants: T.C.G. Swamy, Advocate. For the Respondents: V.V. Asokan, Advocate.

By Hon'ble Mr. K. George Joseph, Administrative Member - 1. As common questions of law and facts arise for consideration in the above Original Applications, they are disposed of by this common order. 2. The applicants...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 05 2011

M. Padmanabhan Ips and Others Vs. Union of India, Represented by Its S ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Aug-05-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicants: M/s. P.C. Sasidharan and R. Sreeraj, Advocates. For the Respondents: Sunil Jacob Jose, SCGSC (R1), N.K. Thankachan, GP (R2) and V.V. Asokan (R3)]

By Hon'ble Mr. K. George Joseph, Administrative Member- 1. The applicants and facts being common these two Original Applications were heard together and are disposed of by this common order. 2. OA 118 of 2009 is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 2011

Santhosh Kumar S.V. Vs. the Deputy Comptroller and Auditor General and ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Mar-15-2011

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: M/s. Dandapani Associates, Advocate. For the Respondents: V.V. Asokan, Advocate.

HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER 1. The applicant is an employee in the office of the Accountant General, Thiruvananthapuram. The disciplinary proceedings were instituted against him under Rule 14 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2011

E.i. Baby Vs. the Comptroller and Auditor General of India, Government ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Jul-14-2011

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: T.C. Govindaswamy, Advocate. For the Respondents: V.V. Asokan, Advocate.

HON'BLE Mr. K. GEORGE JOSEPH, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER1. The applicant, a Senior Auditor in the office of the Principal Accountant General (Audit), Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, is aggrieved by the imposition of penalty of reduction of his pay to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 2005

Narayani Vs. Aravindakshan

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-07-2005

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(3), 4, 5, 11, 12, 16 and 16(1); Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 11; Special Marriage Act, 1872 - Sections 26; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956; Matrimonial Causes Act, 1950 - Sections 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100; Constitution of India - Article 14, 21, 25 and 39; Hindu Code, 1947; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR2006Ker26; I(2006)DMC155; 2005(4)KLT1

Advocate for Appellant : V. Sivaswamy,; V.V. Asokan and; K.I. Mayankutty Mather

Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Defendants 1 to 4 in a suit for partition are the appellants in this second appeal challenging the preliminary decree passed by the trial court, confirmed in first appeal. The first appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 2012

G. Mohanan Nair and Others Vs. the Comptroller and Auditor General of ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Sep-20-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicants: T.C. Govindaswamy, Advocate. For the Respondents: V.V. Asokan, (Iyer and Iyer)) Advocates.

K. George Joseph, Administrative Member Having common facts and issues, these O.As were heard together and are disposed of by this common order. The applicants in O.A. Nos. 127/11, 131/11 and 136/11 are Senior Accountants and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2009

Subramoniam N. Vs. the Secretary, Food and Civil Supplies Department a ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-13-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : General Clauses Act; Essential Commodities Act; Business Rules - Rules 2(2), 4, 7 and 9; Constitution of India - Article 166; Rationing Order

Reported in : 2009(3)KLJ177

Advocate for Appellant : V.V. Asokan, Adv.

V. Giri, J.1. The petitioner is an Authorised Wholesale Dealer of ration articles. He is licensed to run AWD No. 4 at Pottakuzhi Junction in Ernakulam and he is doing so. The 8th respondent is another...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2010

Manuel K.A, Vs. the Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to Go ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Oct-20-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: M.K. Damodaran, Sr. P.K. Vijayamohan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Sunil Jacob Jose, SCGSC(R1), O.V. Radhakrishnan, Sr. with V.V. Asokan(R2-4), Advocate.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.THANKAPPAN,JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. Aggrieved by the dismissal order dated 5th March, 2009 and the Appellate Order dated 24.11.2009 the applicant has filed this Original Application praying that the above orders may be quashed and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial