Advanced Search Results
Arthur Import Export Co. Vs. State of Madras
Chennai
Feb-16-1962
Sales Tax
[1963]14STC1022(Mad)
V. Thyagarajan and T.V. Balakrishnan, Advs.
Venkataraman, J.1. This revision petition filed by Messrs Arthur Import Export Co., questions the assessment of the petitioners to sales tax under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939, for the year 1953-54. The petitioners have...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBurmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India Ltd. Vs. State ...
Chennai
Dec-14-1964
Sales Tax
Madras Sales of Motor Spirit Taxation Act, 1939 - Sections 3(1); Constitution of India - Article 286(2); Sale of Goods Act
AIR1965Mad529; (1965)2MLJ120
Mr. V. Thyagarajan
(1) The appellant is the Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India Ltd. It carries on business by selling petrol and petroleum products wholesale and retail. It has depots at Ernakulam in the Kerala...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.V. Narayanaswami Vs. State of Madras Represented by Inspector of Loc ...
Chennai
Mar-06-1962
Civil
(1962)2MLJ266
Mr. V. Thyagarajan
S. Ramachandra Iyer, C.J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment of Jagadisan, J., rejecting a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution which prayed for the issue of a writ of prohibition with a view...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Cauvery Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. Represented by General Manager Vs. K ...
Chennai
Sep-09-1969
Contract
(1970)2MLJ256
Mr. V. Thyagarajan
P. Ramakrishnan, J.1. This second appeal is filed by the defendant in O.S. No. 145 of 1959, on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli. The prior facts relating to this second appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBurmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Company of India Ltd. Vs. St ...
Chennai
Nov-19-1965
Sales Tax
[1966]18STC479(Mad)
V. Thyagarajan, ;R. Sasidaran, Advs., i/b., King and Partridge
Chandra Reddy, C.J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment of our learned brother Veeraswami, J., declining to remove on certiorari the assessment made by the Commercial Tax Officer, Kanyakumari, which was ultimately confirmed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Madras Represented by Collector of Madras Vs. Balaji Chettiar ...
Chennai
Dec-05-1957
Property
Madras City Improvement Trust Act, 1950 - Sections 73 and 173(2); Constitution of India - Article 14; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 9, 11, 23, 23(1) and 23(2); City Improvement Trust Act, 1945 - Sections 173(2)
AIR1959Mad16; (1958)IIMLJ330
Government Pleader, ;R.G. Rajan, ;C. Rangaswami Aiyangar, ;T.R. Sundaram, ;R. Desikan, ;M.S. Sethu and ;T. Ramakrishna, Advs.
1. These are sixty five appeals and four memoranda of cross-objections, and relate to two big Land Acquisitions resulting in the two batches of appeals and memoranda of cross objections. The first big land acquisition is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTrustees of the Port of Madras Vs. Home Insurance Co. Ltd.
Chennai
Sep-20-1967
ContractLimitation
Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 6, 39, 39(1), 40, 41, 41A, 104, 110 and 111; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 102; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 151, 152 and 161; Madras General Clauses Act, 1891 - Sections 3(2) and 3(22); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(42); Marine Insurance Act, 1963 - Sections 79; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 92, 130A and 135A; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 120
AIR1970Mad48
V.V. Raghavan and ;N. Nagarajan, Advs.
1. I have had the advantage of reading the judgment just delivered by my learned brother. I entirely agree with him, not merely on the conclusion that the appeals ought to be allowed, but also on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubbarama Reddiar Vs. Saraswathi Ammal
Chennai
Mar-16-1966
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10 and 13; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 7, 14 and 56
AIR1967Mad85
(1) This letters Patent Appeal has been instituted by one Subbarama Reddiar, the respondent before Venkatadri, J. in C.M.S.A. 9 of 1964, form the judgment and decree of the learned Judge. We may very briefly state...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.D. Kumarappan Vs. L. Suppiah and anr.
Chennai
Mar-30-1964
Civil
Exchange Control Act - Sections 7 and 31; Indian Contract Act - Sections 211 and 212
AIR1965Mad314
Anantanarayanan, J. (1) This appeal by the plaintiff in the court below, in a suit for recovery of Rs. 13,406-26 nP being his share of the sale proceeds of a property owned in common between him...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.G. Balaji Chettiar Vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd., Bombay
Chennai
Mar-26-1965
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 11, 12(1), 12(3), 18 and 109; Trade Marks Act, 1940
AIR1967Mad148
Mr. Rangaswami Iyengar
(1) This appeal has been preferred under S. 109 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act of 1958, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the decisions of the Asst. Registrar of Trade Marks, Madras, dismissing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »