Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v thyagarajan and · Page 1 of about 63 results (0.047 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 16 1962

Arthur Import Export Co. Vs. State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-16-1962

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1963]14STC1022(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : V. Thyagarajan and T.V. Balakrishnan, Advs.

Venkataraman, J.1. This revision petition filed by Messrs Arthur Import Export Co., questions the assessment of the petitioners to sales tax under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939, for the year 1953-54. The petitioners have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 1964

Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India Ltd. Vs. State ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-14-1964

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madras Sales of Motor Spirit Taxation Act, 1939 - Sections 3(1); Constitution of India - Article 286(2); Sale of Goods Act

Reported in : AIR1965Mad529; (1965)2MLJ120

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. Thyagarajan

(1) The appellant is the Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Co. of India Ltd. It carries on business by selling petrol and petroleum products wholesale and retail. It has depots at Ernakulam in the Kerala...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1962

S.V. Narayanaswami Vs. State of Madras Represented by Inspector of Loc ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-06-1962

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1962)2MLJ266

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. Thyagarajan

S. Ramachandra Iyer, C.J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment of Jagadisan, J., rejecting a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution which prayed for the issue of a writ of prohibition with a view...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 09 1969

Cauvery Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. Represented by General Manager Vs. K ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-09-1969

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1970)2MLJ256

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. Thyagarajan

P. Ramakrishnan, J.1. This second appeal is filed by the defendant in O.S. No. 145 of 1959, on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli. The prior facts relating to this second appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 1965

Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Company of India Ltd. Vs. St ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-19-1965

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1966]18STC479(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : V. Thyagarajan, ;R. Sasidaran, Advs., i/b., King and Partridge

Chandra Reddy, C.J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment of our learned brother Veeraswami, J., declining to remove on certiorari the assessment made by the Commercial Tax Officer, Kanyakumari, which was ultimately confirmed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1957

State of Madras Represented by Collector of Madras Vs. Balaji Chettiar ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-05-1957

Subject : Property

Acts : Madras City Improvement Trust Act, 1950 - Sections 73 and 173(2); Constitution of India - Article 14; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 9, 11, 23, 23(1) and 23(2); City Improvement Trust Act, 1945 - Sections 173(2)

Reported in : AIR1959Mad16; (1958)IIMLJ330

Advocate for Appellant : Government Pleader, ;R.G. Rajan, ;C. Rangaswami Aiyangar, ;T.R. Sundaram, ;R. Desikan, ;M.S. Sethu and ;T. Ramakrishna, Advs.

1. These are sixty five appeals and four memoranda of cross-objections, and relate to two big Land Acquisitions resulting in the two batches of appeals and memoranda of cross objections. The first big land acquisition is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 1967

Trustees of the Port of Madras Vs. Home Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-20-1967

Subject : ContractLimitation

Acts : Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 6, 39, 39(1), 40, 41, 41A, 104, 110 and 111; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 102; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 151, 152 and 161; Madras General Clauses Act, 1891 - Sections 3(2) and 3(22); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(42); Marine Insurance Act, 1963 - Sections 79; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 92, 130A and 135A; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 120

Reported in : AIR1970Mad48

Advocate for Appellant : V.V. Raghavan and ;N. Nagarajan, Advs.

1. I have had the advantage of reading the judgment just delivered by my learned brother. I entirely agree with him, not merely on the conclusion that the appeals ought to be allowed, but also on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 1966

Subbarama Reddiar Vs. Saraswathi Ammal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-16-1966

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10 and 13; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 7, 14 and 56

Reported in : AIR1967Mad85

(1) This letters Patent Appeal has been instituted by one Subbarama Reddiar, the respondent before Venkatadri, J. in C.M.S.A. 9 of 1964, form the judgment and decree of the learned Judge. We may very briefly state...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1964

V.D. Kumarappan Vs. L. Suppiah and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-30-1964

Subject : Civil

Acts : Exchange Control Act - Sections 7 and 31; Indian Contract Act - Sections 211 and 212

Reported in : AIR1965Mad314

Anantanarayanan, J. (1) This appeal by the plaintiff in the court below, in a suit for recovery of Rs. 13,406-26 nP being his share of the sale proceeds of a property owned in common between him...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 1965

T.G. Balaji Chettiar Vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd., Bombay

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-26-1965

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 11, 12(1), 12(3), 18 and 109; Trade Marks Act, 1940

Reported in : AIR1967Mad148

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rangaswami Iyengar

(1) This appeal has been preferred under S. 109 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act of 1958, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the decisions of the Asst. Registrar of Trade Marks, Madras, dismissing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial