Advanced Search Results
Tryambak Lilaji Binnar Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Mar-05-2002
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1989 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2)
2002BomCR(Cri)661; (2002)2BOMLR798; 2002CriLJ3059; 2002(3)MhLj293
V.T. Tulpule, Adv.
A.B. Palkar, J.1. The appellant original accused No. 1 in Special Case No. 10/88 on the file of Special Judge, Nasik, has challenged his conviction and consequent sentence of RI for one year and fine of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Muhammad Masud Muhammad MahsIn B ...
Mumbai
Sep-09-1996
CivilProperty
Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 35 and 37; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 20; Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1881 - Rule 7A, 7B and 7C; Bombay Salt Act, 1890 - Sections 3 and 17; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 9, 11, 18 and 25; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58, 100 and 110; Constitution of India - Article 294; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 99 and 100; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 31 and 32;
1997(2)BomCR314
Rafique Dada, Special Counsel,; V.T. Tulpule, Government Pleader, ;K.K. Tated, Asssistant Government Pleader for appellants Nos. 1 and 2,; Rajiv Kumar, Adv., i/b., Milan Bhise Co., for appellants No.
M.L. Dudhat, J.1. This appeal and the cross appeal are filed against the judgment and decree dated 23rd June 1993 passed by the learned District Judge, Raigad, Alibag in Land Acquisition Reference No. 184 of 1986....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Vinayak Shivajirao Pol and Others
Mumbai
Apr-09-1997
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 201, 235, 313 and 378 ; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 24, 45 and 61; Army Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Article 19 and 21
1998BomCR(Cri)109; 1998CriLJ306; I(1998)DMC322
V.T. Tulpule, P.P.
ORDERV.H. Bhairavia, J. 1. This appeal is preferred by the Stale against the order dated 31st March 1984 passed in Sessions Case No. 61 of 1983, thereby the respondents-accused have been acquitted of the offences punishable...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shri Anil Dattatray Pawar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-20-2001
Constitution
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 307 and 333; Indian Explosive Substances Act - Sections 4 and 5; Arms Act - Sections 3 and 25
AIR2001Bom366; (2001)3BOMLR544; 2001(2)MhLj919
Mr. V.T. Tulpule and ;Mr. J.N. Shetty, Advs.
Vishnu Sahai, J.1. The petitioner, who is a Sub-Inspector of Police directly recruited in the year 1990 in the Maharashtra Police, has principally prayed through the present writ petition, preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Rajesh Alias Kaka Madanlal Soni and Other ...
Mumbai
Sep-23-1997
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 294, 313 and 366; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 143, 144. 145, 147, 148. 149, 302 and 307; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8 and 9; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3. 25 and 27(3)
1998(1)ALLMR420; 1998BomCR(Cri)245
V.T. Tulpule and ;Rajiv Patil, ;Sirish Gupte, ;Pradeep Mahajan,; P.D. Naik and ;M.K. Kochrekar, Advs.
ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Since these two connected matters arise out of a common incident and impugned judgment we are disposing them off by one judgment.2. Vide judgment and order dated 25-10-1996 passed in Sessions Case Nos....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarjerao Sahadeo Gaikwad and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Feb-05-1997
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 100, 302, 304, 307, 323, 326 and 504; Evidence Act - Sections 101, 102 and 105
1997BomCR(Cri)517; 1997CriLJ3839
R.S. Mohite, Adv.
ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Since both these matters arise out of the same incident and a common impugned Judgment, we propose, disposing them off by one Judgment. 2. Both these appeals are directed against the Judgment and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTukaram Dadu Savat Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jan-14-1997
Criminal
(1997)99BOMLR681
R.P. Desai, J.1. The Appellant was charged and tried for an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code in Sessions Case No. 228 of 1982 in the Court of Sessions for Greater Bombay. By...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Shivaji Shivram Tambe and anr.
Mumbai
Jan-16-1997
Criminal
1997(3)ALLMR332; 1997BomCR(Cri)897; (1997)99BOMLR539
Vishnu Sahai, j.1. The appellant aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 30th March, 1984, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge. Thane, in Sessions case No. 136 of 1982. acquitting the Respondents for an offence punishable...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabu Bhika Jadhav Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-14-1996
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302, 303, 304, 307, 323, 324 and 325; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 313; Evidence Act - Sections 101 and 105
1996CriLJ3952
B.G. Vaidya, Adv.
Vishnu Sahai, J. 1. The appellant aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 7-5-83 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No. 109 of 1982 convicting and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSahebrao Nathu Gaikwad Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Feb-12-1997
Criminal
(1997)99BOMLR728
Mrs. Anita A. Agarwal
1. The appellant being aggrieved by the Judgment and order dated 8th August, 1984 passed by the Addl. Session Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 77 of 1984 convicting and sentencing him to undergo seven years...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »