Advanced Search Results

Mulgund Co-operative Credit Society Vs. Shidlingappa Ishwarappa Manvi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyAppeal allowed

Reported in : (1941)43BOMLR807

Broomfield, J.1. The appellant, who was the plaintiff in the Court below, is the Co-operative Credit Society of Mulgund in the Dharwar district. The suit was brought for a declaration that plaintiff is the absolute owner...

P.L. Mani Vs. M.M. thenappa Chettiar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1997)2MLJ148

ORDERT.N. Vallinayagam, J.1. The landlord is the revision petitioner. He filed a petition for eviction on the ground of demolition and reconstruction and wilful default.2. Both the courts below have dismissed the petition holding that there...

R.Manivel Vs. Chief Engineer Tangedco

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.No.15725 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 R.MANIVEL .Petitioner versus 1 THE CHIEF ENGINEER TANGEDCO METTUR THERMAL POWER STATION METTUR...

Ulaganathan Chettiar Vs. Durairajan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rules 51 and 63

Reported in : AIR1982Mad424; (1982)2MLJ74

Advocate for Appellant : K. Duraiswami, Adv.

1. The Second defendant in O.S. No. 1705 of 1973 in the court of the District Munsif of Vridhachalam is the appellant. One Arumugha Mudaliar had four daughters of whom one Sellammal died issueless. The position...

A. Sanjeevi Naidu Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1973]31STC377(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : V. Subramanyan, Adv.

Ramanujam, J.1. The petitioner in this case was assessed for the assessment year 1968-69 under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, in respect of sales of petroleum products dealt with by him. Before the...

Karuppannan Vs. Sudhamathi

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 7, 24 and 25; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1955 - Sections 4, 5 and 6(1)

Reported in : II(1993)DMC457; (1993)IIMLJ293

Advocate for Appellant : V. Subramanyan, T. Thiageswaran and C.V. Karthikeyan

Thangamani, J.1. The appellant herein married the respondent in 1986 and a male child was born to them on 14-6-1987. The respondent-wife instituted O.P.No. 5 of 1990 in the Court of District Judge, Salem against the...

Ratan Chand Chordia Vs. the Special Assistant Commercial Tax Officer ( ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1967]19STC286(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : P.V. Subramanyan, Adv.

ORDERRamakrishnan, J.1. The petitioner in this writ petition for the issue of a writ of certiorari under Article 226 of the Constitution is a financier. He claims to have lent money to one Mallayan Chettiar, Shevvapet,...

Babuna Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Patna

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : (2008)(98)SLJ384CAT

1. Factual matrix necessary for a decision in this O.A. may be summarized as follows: The applicant joined Railway service and superannuated from service with effect from 31.3.1985. At the time he had joined the service,...

Shri Balasaheb Dhondiram Jagdale and Shri Jaysingh mahadeo Chavan Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution (7th Amendment) Act, 1956 - Article 371; Appropriation Act; Development Board Order, 1994 - Rules 7, 7(4), 7(5) and 8; Development Board for Vidharbha and Marathwada and rest of Maharashtra Order, 1994; State of Maharashtra (Special Responsibility of Governor of Vidarbha, Marathwada and Rest of Maharashtra) Order; Constitution of India - Articles 13(3), 154, 162, 199, 199(1), 200, 202, 202(2), 202(3), 203, 204, 205, 206, 266(3), 371, 371(2), 371D, 371D(3) and 371F

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR108; 2008(5)BomCR163; (2008)110BOMLR1617; 2008(5)MhLj300

Advocate for Appellant : A.V. Anturkar i/b. S.B. Deshmukh, Advs., ;V.A. Thorat, Senior Counsel, ;Ashok Misal and ;P.A. Pol, Advs., ;S.G. Aney, Senior Adv., ;Akhila Kaushik, ;Madhav Jamdar and ;S.G. Vaske, Advs.

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. In all the above Petitions, the issue involved is with regard to the special responsibility cast on the Governor of the State of Maharashtra, with regard to development of Vidharbha area. The present...

Ganta Kondamma Vs. Ganta Seethamma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR1973AP319

Advocate for Appellant : N.V. Sankara Rao, Adv.

Ekbote, C.J.1. There were two brothers G. Chenchu Naidu and Narappa Naidu. They constituted a Hindu Joint Family. They owned ' A ' schedule immovable properties at Kesavaram village. Chenchu Naidu died undivided some 37 years...