Advanced Search Results

Rohit Khullar vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. Shukla, Ms. Aparna

$~16 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:10. h February, 2017 FAO3732016 & CMs 44752-44753/2016 ROHIT KHULLAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V. Shukla, Ms. Aparna, Advocates. versus STATE...

Bhupatlal J. Sheth Vs. Income Tax Officer and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

M.S. Sanklecha, J. 1. Rule; By consent Rule returnable forthwith. The Respondents waives service. At the instance and request of the advocates for both sides, the petition is taken up for final hearing. 2. The Petitioner...

A. Panneerselvam Vs. Arakandanallur Primary Agricultural Co-operative ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the third respondent made in Na.Ka.5117/2000, SaPa.dated 29.09.2001 and the...

Indian Oil Corporation and ors. Vs. Shri Ujjal Chowdhury and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21

Reported in : (1999)1CALLT220(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Anindya Mitra, ;Mr. P.K. Mallick, ;Mr. P.K. Chatterjee and ;Mr. A. Meharia, Advs.

V.K. Gupta, J.1. On this reference being made to me in terms of Clause 36 of the Letters Patent, upon a difference of opinion between the two learned Judges of this court in the Division Bench...

State of Uttar Pradesh and anr. Vs. Dr. Prem Behari Lal Saxena

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 311(2); Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 309, 310, 310(2), 311 and 311(1)

Reported in : AIR1969All449; (1969)ILLJ247All

Advocate for Appellant : R.R. Agarwal, Adv.

Oak, C.J.1. These two appeals raise a common question whether Article 311(2) of the Constitution of India is applicable where services of a permanent Government servant are dispensed with on the abolition of the permanent post...

Mohammed Asif Vs. State by Additional Superintendent of Police Cb, Cid ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 -- Sections 197, 239 and 397; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 -- Sections 19; Constitution of India -- Articles 105, 134, 141 and 356; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 -- 21, 120-B, 409, 467 and 477-A; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1989 -- Sections 7, 10, 11, 13, 13(1) and 15; Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1993; Wakf Act, 1995 -- Sections 20; General Clauses Act, 1897 -- Sections 3(60)

Reported in : 1999(2)ALD(Cri)743; 1999(3)CTC25

Advocate for Appellant : N. Jyothi, Adv.

ORDER1. This revision is to quash the orders passed in the petition filed under Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to discharge the petitioner from the charges levelled against him. 2. This revision...

Dilip Kumar Gupta vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : JANUARY18 2017 CRL.M.C. 2910/2016 & Crl.M.A.12488/2016 DILIP KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr.Advocate, with Ms.V.Shukla, Advocates. Versus STATE (NCT...

Ram Phal Singh Sahu vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5331/2018 Judgment delivered on:16.10.2018 RAM PHAL SINGH SAHU ........ Petitioner STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. A.V. Shukla,...

Sh. Rajendra Kumar Tekriwal Vs. Unique Construction Pvt. Ltd. and

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. In this order I am considering C.A. No. 396/07 filed by the R-3 (Sh.Anandrao Gaekwar) seeking deletion from the array of parties and vacation of Company Law Board's order dated 2.8.2007, C.A.No. 432/07 filed by...

Mt. Gomtibai Vs. Kanchhedilal and Others

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1949PC272

Advocate for Appellant : C.S. Rewcastle and Dingle Foot, for Appellant; Sir Thomas Strangman, B. Sen and Miss Tyabji, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, T.L. Wilson and Co.; Solicitors for Respondents, Hy. S.L. Polak and Co.

Sir Madhavan Nair: This is an appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Nagpur dated 29th September 1941, which set aside an order of the Additional District Judge of Jubbulpore,...