Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v shanmugham · Page 1 of about 186 results (0.354 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 02 1974

C. Kalahasti Vs. P.C. Munuswami Chetti

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-02-1974

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100, 104(2), 105 and 107(2) - Order 39, Rule 1 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1975Mad3

Advocate for Appellant : V. Shanmugham, Adv.

1. The defendant in the suit is the appellant. The plaintiff who is the respondent in tbis appeal was the Secretary of the Board of Trustees in charge of the Thyagaraya Chetti Educational Institution and of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1992

A. Subaschandra Bose Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-10-1992

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1993]199ITR267(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : V. Shanmugham, Adv.

ORDERS. Nainar Sundaram, A.C.J. 1. The learned single judge took not of the fact that the petitioner before him, the appellant herein, has got a right of appeal under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2000

Mani Janagarajan Vs. Kammavar Sangam Through Its Secretary R. Krishnas ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-30-2000

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 --Sections 100 -- Order 47 -- Rules 1 and 8; Tamil Nadu Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act -- Sections 11, 15 and 64C

Reported in : 2000(4)CTC425

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. Shanmugham, Adv.

ORDER1. The above Review Application has been filed to review the judgment dated 19.7.1999 made in Second Appeal No.739 of 1999.2. The grounds taken on behalf of the review applicant are that the patta issued under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 28 1994

Shri Kandavel Industries Vs. Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporat ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-28-1994

Subject : Company

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 31

Reported in : [1998]93CompCas704(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Duraiswami, ;V. Shanmugham and ;A.L. Somayaji, Advs.

A.R. Lakshmanan, J.1. In this and various other batch of writ petitions, various debtors/industrial concerns have questioned the action taken by the Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation'), a notified...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1999

Salem Chit Funds and Financiers Association Represented by Its Secreta ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-05-1999

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 -- Sections 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 (1), 61, 62, 63, 71 (2) -- Tamil Nadu Partnership (Registration of Firms) Rules, 1932, Rule 3A

Reported in : 1999(1)CTC373; (1999)IIMLJ46

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. Shanmugham, Adv.

ORDER1. Salem Chit Funds and financiers Association represented by its secretary has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the respondent relating to G.O.Ms.747 Commercial Taxes and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2000

Sri Nallalagu Polytechnic Managing Committee, Kamaraj Education and Re ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-23-2000

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 11, 21(1), 39, 41, 42, 47, 50, 147 -- Order 21, Rules 5, 8, 35, 98, 99, 100, 103 and 115; Amendment Act, 1976; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 52; Evidence Act, 1872 -- Sections 18 and 31

Reported in : 2000(3)CTC362

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. Shanmugham, Senior Adv.

ORDER1. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the fair and decretal order dated 18.8.1994 made in E.A.No.999 of 1989 in E.P.No.2 of 1989 by the Court of District Munsif, Ponneri thereby dismissing an application filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 1996

C. Murugesan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Represented by Secretary to Munic ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-04-1996

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1997)1MLJ398

ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. The writ petitioner has challenged the panel of promotion of the Superintending Engineers drawn up by the Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board (hereinafter referred to as 'TWAD Board') dated 7.8.1996. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 1992

Soudambika Finance Pvt. Ltd. Coimbatore and Etc. Etc. Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-30-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 4(3), 5, 6(1, 2 and 3), 7(2), 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16(2 and 3), 17(2), 18(4 and 5), 19, 20(1), 21, 22(2), 24, 28, 29, 30, 31, 39(2), 48(1), 50, 64, 75, 76, 77 and 79; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 245 and 246; Chit Funds (Pondicherry) Rules, 1986; Pondicherry Chit Funds Act, 1966; Chitties Act, 1964; Cochin Kuris Regulations, 1932; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 45-N and 451; Tamil Nadu Chit Fund Rules, 1984 - Rules 4A, 13, 18(4 and 5), 28, 31 and 63; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 39(2) and 48; Indian Registration Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR1993Mad190; [1995]82CompCas302(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Chandramouli and;Mrs. Nalini Chidambaram, Sr. Counsel for;M/s. Vijayanarayanan,;S. Silambanan,;N. Sivasankaran and;A.L. Somayaji, Advs. for;M/s. V.N. Venkataraj,;N. Jothi,;V.N. Kumara Ganapathy,;N.

ORDER1. Since common and similar as well as overlapping questions of law and facts arise for consideration and submissions have been made by counsel appearing on either side, these writ petitions are considered and dealt with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2007

Prabhakar S/O Zabaji @ Sahebrao Sirsat Vs. the State of Maharashtra Th ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-11-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307 and 324

Reported in : (2007)109BOMLR1464

Advocate for Appellant : M.I. Dhatrak, Adv.

K.J. Rohee, J.1. By this appeal the appellant challenges his conviction for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 307 of IPC and punishment thereunder by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in Sessions Trial No. 244/1993...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2005

Cit Vs. Pateshwari Electrical and Associated Industries (P) Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-08-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]147TAXMAN240(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Shambhu Chopra, for the Revenue.

1. At the instance of CIT, Tribunal has referred three questions, 1, 2, 3 and at the instance of assessee, Tribunal has referred the following question, which is marked as question No. 4 under section 256(2)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial