Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v s sharma · Page 1 of about 26 results (0.395 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 01 1983

Col. D.D. Joshi and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-01-1983

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 32

Reported in : AIR1983SC420; 1983LabIC530; (1983)IILLJ14SC; 1983(1)SCALE226; (1983)2SCC235; [1983]2SCR448; 1983(1)SLJ427(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : M.K. Ramamurthi Indra Sawhney, Advs

1.commissioned Officer belonging to Army Medical Corps ('AMC' for short), having post graduate qualifications in different specialities at the time of obtaining commission have approached this Court under Article 32 complaining of a discriminatory treatment in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1991

indodan Milk Products Ltd. Vs. Labour Court and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-09-1991

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A and 18

Reported in : (1992)IILLJ234All

Advocate for Appellant : Markandey Katju, Adv.

Palok Basu, J.1. The question involved in the present writ petition is as to whether the respondents Jagdish Prasad and Om Pal Singh could be held by the impugned award of the Labour Court dated September...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2005

Mohammad Afsar S/O Mohammad Samsher and ors. Vs. Khurshidbano Wd/O Moh ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-23-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 33

Reported in : 2006(1)BomCR679; 2006(1)MhLj331

Advocate for Appellant : A.V. Bhide, Adv.

A.H. Joshi, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of parties. Heard finally.2. This is a petition by Original Defendant Nos. 1, and 3 to 6.3. Defendant Nos. 1 to 6 filed an application...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 17 2009

Sahney Kirkwood Private Ltd. Vs. the Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-17-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 260A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41 - Rule 5(1) and 5(3)

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR1790

Advocate for Appellant : S.E. Dastur, Sr. Counsel, ;R. Murlidhar and ;Rajesh Shah, Advs., i/b., Rajesh Shah & Co.

1. The appellants by the present motions have prayed to grant stay of recovery of tax and interest for the assessment years 1998-99 to 2003-04 which are the subject matter of the dispute till the disposal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2008

Mr. Padam Chandra Singhi, Vs. Dr. Praful B. Desai and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-14-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 114 and 338

Reported in : 2008(5)BomCR367; (2008)110BOMLR795

Advocate for Appellant : S.H. Doctor, Sr. Counsel and ;Praveer Diwan, Adv., i/b., Tyabji Dayabhai & Co.

ORDERV.C. Daga, J.1. This notice of motion taken out by the plaintiffs was rejected for the reasons to be recorded. Accordingly, reasons with factual backdrop is being recorded.2. The notice of motion claimed following relief:(a) that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2005

C.N. Sundaram Vs. Chenai Finance Company Limited and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-06-2005

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 62, 127, 128, 133 and 139; Indian Partnership Act, 1932

Reported in : 2005(4)ALD850; 2005(5)ALT60

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Gopal Rao, Adv.

N.V. Ramana, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 14-11-1994 passed by the IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in O.S. No. 322 of 1989.2. The appellant is Defendant No. 7...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2002

Jerrypothu Shamul John Babu Vs. Peddipoga Anandarao and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-03-2002

Subject : BankingCommercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 18, Rule 17; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33

Reported in : 2002(3)ALT510

Advocate for Appellant : P. Gopal Das, Adv.

ORDERS. Ananda Reddy, J.1. This revision is filed against the order of the III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Gunturin I.A. No. 243 of 2001 in O.S. No. 1095 of 1995, dated 23.2.2001. 2. According to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 2002

Arvind Kumar Vs. Principal Director, Process and Product Development C ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-15-2002

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 16

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC601

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Budhwar and ;Sudhir Agarwal, Advs.

G.P. Mathur, J. 1. There is a Society known as Process and Product Development Centre, which is functioning at Agra. The Society is wholly owned and managed by Government of India through the Ministry of Industries....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 2004

Sashi Jena and ors. Vs. Khadal SwaIn and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-10-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 202; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33 and 157

Reported in : AIR2004SC1492; 2004(1)ALD(Cri)617; 2004CriLJ1394; I(2004)DMC575SC; JT2004(2)SC339; 2004(2)SCALE348; (2004)4SCC236

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Misra, Sr. Adv.,; Shibashish Misra and; R.M. Patnaik

B.N. Agarwal, J. 1. The appellants were convicted by trial court under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. On appeal being preferred, their conviction and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 1989

State of U.P. Vs. Pheru Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-16-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 193, 201, 218, 341, 342, 384, 388, 420 and 466; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR1989SC1205; 1989Supp(1)SCC288

S. Ratnavel Pandian, J.1. These three appeals by grant of special leave under Article 136 of the Constitution of India arise out of the common judgment rendered by the High Court of Allahabad acquitting all these...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial