Advanced Search Results

Sri. Mukesh Gupta, Managing Director, Offshore Financial Services Vs. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138, 141, 141(1) and 142

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD(Cri)261; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)147; II(2003)BC332; [2003]114CompCas728(AP); [2003]44SCL542(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Raju, Adv.

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. These two Criminal Petitions are filed by one Mukesh Gupta - Accused No. 14 in C.C. No. 1814/98 and C.C. No. 1321 of 1998 on the file of XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, City Criminal...

Smt. G. Vijayalakshmi and ors. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of In ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 5, 73 and 113

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD(Cri)580; [2000]100CompCas726(AP); (2000)4CompLJ132(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Raju, Adv.

Vaman Rao, J. 1. This petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, seeks quashing of proceedings in C. C. No. 16 of 1998 on the file of the Special Judge for Economic Offences,...

Sunil Kumar Chhaperia Vs. Dakka Eshwaraiah and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalCompany

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 142

Reported in : 2001(1)ALD(Cri)633; 2001(1)ALT(Cri)355; [2002]108CompCas687(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Raju, Adv.

R. Ramanujam, J. 1. The oft recurring question that:Whether a Director of a Company registered under the Companies Act is liable Cor prosecution for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act without...

Soujanya Hotels Private Ltd. Vs. Nalla Satyanarayana Murthy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 439; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 24 and 96

Reported in : 1994(3)ALT356; [2001]103CompCas1082(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Raju and ;P.V. Rama Raju, Advs.

P.L.N. Sarma, J.1. This original side appeal has been preferred by the respondent in Company Petition No. 44 of 1994, challenging the order of the learned single judge dated August 11, 1994, admitting the company petition...

In Re: Magnaquest Solutions Private Limited, a Company Incorporated Un ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4(1), 94(1), 95, 97, 97(1), 235 to 251 and 391 to 394; Income Tax Act - Sections 72A; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 67 to 87

Reported in : (2008)3CompLJ345(AP); [2007]80SCL496(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Raju, Adv.

ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. In this petition, filed under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, the petitioner-transferor company prays that the scheme of amalgamation, as approved by the respective Board of Directors of the...

D. Ramkishore and ors. Vs. Vijayawada Share Brokers Ltd. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F and 397 to 406; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 9

Reported in : [2008]144CompCas326(AP); [2009]89SCL279(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Raju, Adv. in Company Appeal No. 4 of 2007,; Gangadhar Chamarthy, Adv. in C.A. Nos. 288 and 289 of 2008 and 1042 of 2007,; Rupendra Mahendra, Adv. in C.A. Nos. 1109 of 2007, 209 and 291 of 2008,;

Ramesh Ranganathan, J.1. This appeal is filed, under Section 10F of the Companies Act 1956, by 22 shareholders of the first respondent-company aggrieved by the order of the Company Law Board in C.P. No. 56 of...

In the Matter of Asian Coffe Limited

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 173(2), 393(1 and 3) and 394; SICA Act - Sections 22

Reported in : 2000(3)ALD94

Advocate for Appellant : M/s. S. Ravi,;V.S. Raju,;C. Kodandaram,;Y. Ratnakar and;Mrs. S. Rekha Prasad, Advs.

1. This is a petition under Section 394 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 for approving the scheme of amalgamation of the petitioner company M/s. Asian Coffee Limited (for short, 'ACL') with M/s. Consolidated Coffee Limited...

Ambadas Vittal Gajul Vs. S.R. Bootla

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Trade Marks Act - Sections 27(2)

Reported in : 2004(6)ALD391

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Raju, Adv.

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. These two civil miscellaneous appeals are between the same parties and relate to the same subject-matter. Hence, they are disposed of through a common judgment.2. The appellant and the respondent in both...

In Re: Compact Power Sources Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 to 394

Reported in : 2004(2)ALT735; [2005]125CompCas289(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Raju, Adv.

N.V. Ramana, J.1. These two Company Petitions have been filed by M/s. Compact Power Sources Private Limited (Transferor Company) and M/s. HBL Nife Power Systems Limited (Transferee Company) under Sections 391 - 394 of the Companies...

The State of Maharashtra and Another Vs. Viran Gyanlal Rajput and Anot ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Smt. I.K. Jain, J. 1. The Confirmation Case No.3 of 2014 arises out of the reference made by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon, Raigad, in Sessions Case No.8 of 2013 for confirmation of death sentence...