Advanced Search Results
indo Rama Synthetics (India) Limited (a Company Incorporated Under the ...
Mumbai
Jul-06-2007
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2 and 35G; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57B; Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001; Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002; Excise Law
2007(6)BomCR302; (2007)109BOMLR1327; 2007(120)ECC15; 2007LC15(Bombay)
V.S. Nankani, Adv.
J.P. Devadhar, J.1. Heard Shri V.S. Nankani, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant-assessee and Shri S.K. Mishra, the learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. This appeal is filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAfloat Textiles (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Mumbai
Feb-24-2004
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 28, 111 and 112; Constitution of India - Article 226
2004(5)BomCR733; 2004(170)ELT138(Bom)
V.S. Nankani, ;N.S. Thakkar and ;H.P. Modh, Advs.
ORDERJ.P. Devadhar, J.1. Rule, returnable forthwith. By the consent of the parties both the matters are taken up for final hearing.2. Since common order passed by the CEGAT, Mumbai, dated 22-4-2003 is challenged in these two...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Chokhani Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Commissioner of Cust ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Feb-17-2012
Customs
For the Appellants : Shri V.S. Nankani, Shri Naresh Thacker, Shri G.B. Yadav, Shri A.V. Naik, Advocates. For the Respondent : Shri P.N. Das, Commissioner (A.R.).
Ashok Jindal The appellants, M/s. Chokhani Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd., M/s Tax Fab Corporation and M/s Punit Impex are in appeals against the confirmation of demand of duty under Section 28(1) of the Customs Act, 1962...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Pratibha Syntext Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Mumbai
Jul-28-2003
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25, 28AB and 111
2003(4)ALLMR25; 2004(1)BomCR92; 2003(157)ELT141(Bom)
V.S. Nankani, ;N.S. Thakker, ;H. Modh and ;M.G. Gawade, Advs.
V.C. Daga, J.1. This petition is directed against the final order bearing No. 21/2000, dated 3/10-5-2002 (Ex. E) passed by the Settlement Commission, Customs & Central Excise, Additional Bench, Mumbai ('the Commission' for short) (Respondent No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTransman International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Nov-14-1998
MRTP
(1999)(113)ELT973Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This application was argued by Shri V.S. Nankani, the ld. Advocate and Shri B.K. Suman appeared for the Revenue.2. The authorities detained stainless steel coils, sheets and circles from a warehouse. These goods were claimed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPioneer Embroideries Ltd. and Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jun-11-2004
Land Acquisition
(2005)(98)ECC61
1. These appeals were heard on two days on 6.5.2004 and 20.5.2004 when the learned advocates Shri V.S. Nankani and Shri Naresh Thakker respectively appeared on behalf of the appellants on these days. Shri K.M. Mondal,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTransmann International Ltd. and Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Aug-11-2006
MRTP
1. Heard both sides at length. Shri V.S. Nankani, ld Advocate for the appellants has submitted summary of his arguments on 15.5.2006. Shri S.G. Dewalkar, ld SDR appearing on behalf of the Department has submitted summary...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPremier Automobiles Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jul-28-1994
Land Acquisition
(1995)LC164Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This appeal is directed against the order in original No. S/10-12/85 CIU dt. 25-7-1986 of the Addl. Collector of Customs, Bombay ordering confiscation vide Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, of the consignment declared...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK and K Gems Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Feb-04-1998
MRTP
(1998)(100)ELT70Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The Appellants imported a consignment of Rough unworked Emeralds as per their declaration in Bill of Entry dated 9-1-1997 filed in Mumbai Custom House. The value of the goods declared was Rs. 32,34,370/-.During the examination...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK and K Gems Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Feb-12-1998
MRTP
(1998)(76)LC117Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The Appellants imported a consignment of Rough unworked Emeralds as per their declaration in Bill of Entry dated 9.1.1997 filed in Mumbai Custom House. The value of the goods declared was Rs. 32,34,370/-.During the examination...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »