Advanced Search Results

Mohan Singh Vs. D.D.C. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 19(1)

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2413

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Chaudhary, Adv.

ORDERS.N. Srivastava, J.1. Heard Sri V.S. Chaudhary for the petitioner and Sri S. Goswami Standing Counsel representing the opposite parties. I have also perused the record and considered the submissions made across the bar.2. It would...

Smt. Dharam Biri Vs. Dy. Director of Consolidation and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 9A(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1251

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Chaudhary, Adv.

Krishna Murari, J.1. Heard Sri V. S. Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Dhan Prakash appearing for respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6 and learned standing counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.2. The dispute...

Bhop Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1990(2)WLN582

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.L. Garg

Y.R. Meena, J.1. Appellants were tried for the charges Under Section s, 147,302 and 302/149 IPC by the Sessions Judge, Pali who vide judgment dated August 10, 1987 held them guilty Under Section 302 read with...

Shri I.D. Kaushik Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Haryana Public Service Commission (Conditions of Service) Regulations, 1972 - Regulation 15; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 316(2)

Reported in : (1995)109PLR24

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Patwalia, Adv.

Amarjeet Chaudhary, J.1. The petitioner, I.D. Kaushik had submitted resignation from the Membership of Haryana Public Service Commission on July 1, 1994, copy of which is Annexure P-4 to the writ petition, which was accepted by...

Mangey Ram. Vs. Mangey Ram.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (C.P.C) - Order 7 Rule 11; Specific Relief Act - Section 34

Advocate for Appellant : B. Malik, Adv.

1. Khasra No. 833 A area 2 Bigha 10 Biswa 1 Biswansi and Khasra No. 433 B area 16 Biswa 6 Biswansi, total 2 plots and total area 3 Bigha 8 Biswa 7 Biswansi are subject...

Dr. Prakash Gangaram Kajrolkar Vs. Chaudhari Yatra Co. Pvt. Ltd. (Bori ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Sunanda Barve-Advocate for the Revisionist.

Oral Order: Per Shri S.R. Khanzode, Honble Presiding Judicial Member 1. There is delay of 16 months in filing this revision petition. Therefore misc.application for condonation of delay is filed. In fact no revision would lie...

Balzor Singh Vs. Balbir Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act - Sections 331; Indian Succession Act - Sections 63; Evidence Act - Sections 63 and 68; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 23 and 23-A

Reported in : AIR2005All117; 2005(3)AWC2272

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Chaudhary, ;B.S. Chaudhary, ;I.B. Singh and G.K. Chaturvedi, Advs.

ORDERK.N. Ojha, J.1. Instant appeal has been preferred against order dated 8th September, 1987 passed by IXth Additional Civil Judge, Meerut in Civil Appeal No. 250 of 1982 Baizor v. Balbir whereby judgment and decree dated...

Ram Chandra Vs. Dy. Director of Consolidation, Ghaziabad and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings, Act, 1953 - Sections 4 and 4(1) and (2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(3)AWC1799

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Chaudhary, ;V.K. Singh and ;P.R. Maurya, Advs.

R.H. Zaidi, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. None appeared on behalf of the respondents. However, learned standing counsel is present.2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of...

Ram Sanehi Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules - Rule 115C

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC2111

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Chaudhary, Adv.

ORDERRakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.2. This petition has been filed for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the orders dated 16.12.1983 passed...

Anil Kumar Pandey Vs. Daulat Prasad

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200, 202 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 294, 467, 471, 506II and 506B; ;Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1)(X)

Reported in : 2005(3)MPHT463; 2005(4)MPLJ467

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Chaudhary, Adv.

ORDERRakesh Saksena, J. 1. Applicant has filed this petition under Section 482, Cr.PC for quashing the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 100/2003 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sagar and/or the order dated 28-1-2003 passed in...